The Info-Comm Media Development Authority (IMDA) confirmed that the Ministry of Home Affair (MHA) was among the ‘relevant parties’ that were consulted on the WATAIN concert before it was given the green-light.

IMDA’s cluster director of communications and marketing Karen Low said, “Given the band’s history and concerns expressed by MHA, IMDA allowed the Watain concert with a rating of ‘Restricted 18 (R18)’.”

She added that this is how IMDA has treated similar performances in the past. “In assessing and classifying content for arts performances and concerts, IMDA aims to protect the young from unsuitable content, maintain community norms and values, and safeguard public interest, while enabling adults to make informed choices,” she said.

However, after the concert was cancelled hours before it was to be held on 7 March, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugan said to the press that he couldn’t see how the Swedish black metal ban could have been allowed to perform in Singapore given their anti-Christian lyrics.

IMDA pulled the plug on the concert after MHA advised IMDA against allowing the concert to proceed. MHA, on the other hand, insisted that the online petition with over 16,000 signatures created on 6 March calling for the government to ban WATAIN had no bearing on the MHA’s decision.

“I saw the lyrics – it’s four-letter words on Jesus Christ, on Christianity, on religion, abusing the cross – everything that is so far out that I can’t see how we could have agreed to it,” said Mr Shanmugam.

He said, “The Christian preachers, when they talk to me, say ‘you are very, very strict when it comes to anti-Muslim, anti-Islamic messages…They said: ‘You treat the Muslim community differently than the Christian community.’ I looked at it and I thought that there is some truth to what they say, I won’t say that it is completely true but it is an approach.”

The thing is, since IMDA confirmed that they did in fact consult MHA before approving WATAIN’s concert, we can presume that the lyrics and background of the band would have been made known to MHA beforehand.

However on the day the Watain concert was due to take place – MHA asked IMDA to consider cancelling the performance due to “new and serious concerns about public order, and ground reactions relating to social and religious harmony.”

So we can see that the IMDA’s stance hasn’t changed and the band certainly didn’t change their lyrics. On the other hand, the two evolving factors are MHA’s “new and serious concerns” about the concert and the last minute online petition to ban WATAIN.

When you look at it that way, can we really be certain that MHA’s wasn’t influenced by the petition to reverse its initial decision?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Circuit breaker measures could be extended further if COVID-19 situation does not improve, says Chan Chun Sing

Following the ‘circuit breaker’ measures that have taken effect this week, Trade…

水獭私闯水疗中心 店主帖文哭诉“池塘鱼儿死光光”

水獭在阻断措施实施期间,到处趴趴走,不仅到过竹脚妇孺医院去,然而有网民哭诉水獭们“私闯”水疗中心的池塘,杀死了池塘内的所有鱼儿,包括一条养了13年的金龙鱼。 前艺人刘琦周二(5月12日)在脸书帖文,哭诉她设立于碧山公园的水疗中心遭水獭闯入,并捕猎池塘中的鱼儿,大快朵颐。 她在另一个帖文中也悼念池中一条13岁的金龙鱼“阿发”,回忆帖文中写到,这条金龙鱼大约有88公分长。她在回应本地著名谐星梁荣耀留言询问时,确认了“阿发”已死,“阿发挺过了洪水和干旱,却无法逃脱这场大屠杀”。 有关帖文吸引夺命网友留言安慰和打抱不平,然而也有部分网友指出,“水獭是野生动物,谁也不能预料它会去哪里。既然现在水疗中心关闭了,为了避免悲剧重演,或许可以将池塘内的鱼带回家或迁到其他地方饲养”。 据水疗中心脸书帖文显示,该中心将配合阻断措施法令,自4月7日开始关闭到6月1日。而昨日就有人发现Zouk家族最近在碧山-宏茂桥公园出现,和滨海湾家族“争夺领地”,因此谁是杀死水疗中心池中鱼儿的罪魁祸首,就不得而知了。

Water “ponding” in SMRT trains on East-West Line

A TOC reader. Ron Goh posted a photo of a train on…