The Info-Comm Media Development Authority (IMDA) confirmed that the Ministry of Home Affair (MHA) was among the ‘relevant parties’ that were consulted on the WATAIN concert before it was given the green-light.

IMDA’s cluster director of communications and marketing Karen Low said, “Given the band’s history and concerns expressed by MHA, IMDA allowed the Watain concert with a rating of ‘Restricted 18 (R18)’.”

She added that this is how IMDA has treated similar performances in the past. “In assessing and classifying content for arts performances and concerts, IMDA aims to protect the young from unsuitable content, maintain community norms and values, and safeguard public interest, while enabling adults to make informed choices,” she said.

However, after the concert was cancelled hours before it was to be held on 7 March, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugan said to the press that he couldn’t see how the Swedish black metal ban could have been allowed to perform in Singapore given their anti-Christian lyrics.

IMDA pulled the plug on the concert after MHA advised IMDA against allowing the concert to proceed. MHA, on the other hand, insisted that the online petition with over 16,000 signatures created on 6 March calling for the government to ban WATAIN had no bearing on the MHA’s decision.

“I saw the lyrics – it’s four-letter words on Jesus Christ, on Christianity, on religion, abusing the cross – everything that is so far out that I can’t see how we could have agreed to it,” said Mr Shanmugam.

He said, “The Christian preachers, when they talk to me, say ‘you are very, very strict when it comes to anti-Muslim, anti-Islamic messages…They said: ‘You treat the Muslim community differently than the Christian community.’ I looked at it and I thought that there is some truth to what they say, I won’t say that it is completely true but it is an approach.”

The thing is, since IMDA confirmed that they did in fact consult MHA before approving WATAIN’s concert, we can presume that the lyrics and background of the band would have been made known to MHA beforehand.

However on the day the Watain concert was due to take place – MHA asked IMDA to consider cancelling the performance due to “new and serious concerns about public order, and ground reactions relating to social and religious harmony.”

So we can see that the IMDA’s stance hasn’t changed and the band certainly didn’t change their lyrics. On the other hand, the two evolving factors are MHA’s “new and serious concerns” about the concert and the last minute online petition to ban WATAIN.

When you look at it that way, can we really be certain that MHA’s wasn’t influenced by the petition to reverse its initial decision?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

律师失联案 警方扣Allied Tech执行董事手机电脑调查

本月23日,一家上市公司Allied Technologies申诉,其交给本地律师事务所 JLC Advisors托管的3300万元款项不知所踪。如今警方介入,取走该公司执行董事Low Si Ren的手机和笔记型电脑,以进一步调查此事。 Low Si Ren也在28日于商业事务局(CAD)接受问话,隔日便交上他的护照。 商业调查局也从该公司取走和托管账户有关的文件和记录。Allied Tech表示当局还未透露进一步的调查细节,惟愿意该局充分合作。 此前,Allied Tech称从今年3月23日起,包括本月17日已多次向该事务所索讨上述款项,不过事务所管理合伙人王赐安都一再告知款项很快就会发放,从未提及这笔钱已经不见,或后者无法遵照托管合约交出款项。…

AGC says camera installed outside toilet of police station; Stolen tap costs more than almost all of IKEA's

It was reported yesterday (15 Aug) that a man who stole a…

预计需2至3周完成检讨巴蒂案 尚穆根下月才发表部长声明

有鉴于警方和总检察署预计需二至三周时间,完成检讨前女佣巴蒂案,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根也表示,将在11月才在国会针对此事发表部长声明。 尚穆根是在今日(2日)告知媒体,在警方和总检察署完成检讨后,才会在国会对此发表部长声明。他在上月16日表示,多名议员将在国会复会时,针对前女佣案件提问,为此他也准备提供部长声明回应。 有鉴于此,工人党主席、阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,也暂时不会再申请休会动议,将待部长声明和合适的期间参与辩论。 工人党认为,尽管内部检讨仍在进行,对于巴蒂案件反映刑事司法制度更广泛的问题,有必要采取适当的措施去回应相关缺失。 前女佣巴蒂,被前樟宜机场集团主席廖文良一家指控偷窃,幸在本月初获高庭法官翻案,沉冤得雪。巴蒂一案近两周来引起国人议论,并关注女佣在整个审讯中处于弱势的地位。高庭法官陈成安判决中,更形容廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 高庭法官陈成安,在判决中也点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。由于高庭法官的判词,也针对警方的调查工作,这也致使警方需出面回应此事,表示将展开调查。 尽管早前巴蒂有意对两名主控官发起纪律研讯,惟在本周二却又提呈撤诉的申请。 巴蒂代表律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani),今午(10月1日)在法庭告知大法官梅达顺,过去一个月来发生的事件,令巴蒂负荷不来,再者被官司缠身四年,巴蒂希望能早日返乡,这是巴蒂有意撤诉的原因之一。 不过,巴蒂仍坚信,两名副检察司(Deputy Public Prosecutor),仍需要针对她的指控作出交代。…