Food Emporium at Changi Airport Terminal 4 in Singapore (Photo by i viewfinder from Shutterstock.com).

The Independent Singapore, a socio-political website has decided to retract two articles that made allegations against NTUC Foodfare Co-Operative; the food-centre operator at Changi Terminal 4.

The first article was published on 19 Nov last year alleging of an elderly hawker passed away due to exhaustion after working 18-hour days to avoid hefty fine by NTUC Foodfare.

Another article that ran the same day alleged that NTUC Foodfare imposed a S$3,500 fine to an “elderly and injured tenant” who was injured during working and had to close stall for a few days because he was not able to find replacement workers.

Huge speculation had gone viral over the web that resulted NTUC Foodfare to came up with Media Statements on 20 Nov to answer the allegations.

A day after the media statement release, NTUC Foodfare said that it will take legal actions against the website for producing allegedly defamatory articles, also through its lawyer, it demand The Independent Singapore to apologies and retract the article from their website and social media. However, the website refuse to comply, maintaining that the articles were “based on facts” and should remain published until being proven to be “false and baseless.”

Both articles has been taken down from The Independent Singapore’s website and Facebook page.
In the retraction statement published on the website, The Independent Singapore said that it had clarified these facts with NTUC Foodfare and are “satisfied that NTUC Foodfare did not act in the manner that the articles implied.”

Specifically, it did not cause the death of any elderly stall operator nor forced him to work 18-hour days.
Both articles were :

  • “Elderly hawker allegedly passed away after working 18-hour days to avoid hefty fine when NTUC Foodfare rejected appeal to shorten operating hours” and
  • “NTUC Foodfare slaps $3500 fine on elderly and injured tenant who was unable to operate for a few days”.

On the publisher’s note appended with the statement, it mentioned that The Independent Singapore is prepared to provide one day per month free legal clinic for all hawkers in Singapore to help them be better placed to deal with matters such as contract obligations.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

84-year-old Singaporean becomes 12th COVID-19 fatality; cases surge past 10,000 mark

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has reported the country’s 12th COVID-19 death…

At least six former employees of Keppel O&M involved in Brazil corruption scandal

It has been reported that a US court document shows that at…

引发反送中修例抗争源头 杀人嫌犯陈同佳出狱

香港反送中风波持续5个月,其中触发此次剧烈抗争的个案源头,在台湾犯下杀人案的香港籍人士陈同佳,今日(23日)在香港刑满出狱。他在狱外两度鞠躬,向被害者潘晓颖家人及香港人道歉。 综合港媒报道,于早上7点近百传媒已在西贡壁屋监狱外守候,约9点左右,陈同佳背着红色背包自行步出监狱。在接受媒体采访时,陈同佳表示,已明白到自己做了无可挽救的错事,因此为潘晓颖的家人带来很大的伤痛。 香港当局此前洗黑钱的罪状(涉盗用身亡女友提款卡和财物)审讯陈同佳,并判他入狱。 陈同佳亦表示会愿意为自己的犯下的错自首,返回台湾服刑受审。 “我自己内心都一直受责备、受谴责,所以我愿意为自己的冲动,自己犯下的错事自首,返回台湾服刑受审,希望她的家人能够稍稍放下释怀,令晓颖能安息”。 与此同时,陈同佳亦向社会与香港人道歉,“只能说对不起,希望各位的原谅,希望各位可以给我机会重新做人,给机会我回报社会”,并鞠躬致歉。 陈同佳处置何去何从?台港争议不断 陈同佳杀人案被视为是香港反修订《逃犯条例》的导火线,当时因在台湾把其港籍女友杀害弃尸,并潜逃回香港。 虽然当时已被香港警方抓获,但因与台湾无司法互助或安排逃犯移交协议,故无法将嫌犯移交到台湾进行审讯,故此,香港保安局期望能修改《逃犯修例》。 港民认为缺乏立法会审批的移交过程,程序过于简单,担心引发不公平审讯,中国可以轻易要求香港将疑犯移交到中国受审,因此触发大规模的反弹并延烧至今。 针对其陈同佳的处理,台湾和香港当局仍未就哪一方应对陈同佳涉嫌杀人逃匿案的司法追究作出决定,双方最新的表态更是引发国际争议。 据报导指出,台湾法务部部长蔡清祥于表示,打击跨境罪案应遵循司法互助的处理,并坚持拒绝陈同佳来台自首。…