The Manpower Ministry replied in ST Forum today telling Singaporeans essentially the PAP government’s usual stand of not having automatic CPF payouts at age 65 (‘CPF payout: Decision can be made any time from age 65‘, 6 Mar).

It was responding to ST Forum letters from members of public urging the government to make payouts automatic at 65 or even earlier, as well as to pay out the entire retirement sum by 70.

Dr Ho Ting Fei asked, “Why not make payouts automatically start at 65, or even earlier, especially since Mrs (Josephine) Teo said there was no advantage for the CPF Board or the Government to want members to defer payouts beyond 65?”

“Let those who need the money receive it, and the rest can opt for the deferred payout and enjoy the attractive interest rate,” Dr Ho argued.

He also proposed that all payouts should be completed by 70. Citing SingStat, he had observed that survival rates for Singaporeans drop steeply after 70. He said, “The payout at age 70 should include the entire Retirement Sum. The CPF Board should not hold on to the sums of every person who turns 70 and dispense it in monthly portions over the next 23 years until the person turns 93.”

“According to SingStat, only about 30 per cent of Singapore residents are expected to be alive at 90. What merit is there, then, in not paying out the entire Retirement Sum at 70?” he asked.

He urged the PAP government to be more “compassionate and practical” in considering the payout age based on Singaporeans’ life expectancy, as well as the “needs and entitlements of individuals”.

Another writer Lawrence Loh Kiah Muan agreed with Dr Ho. Mr Loh commented that CPF rules and policies should be simple and logical, instead of being complicated, confusing and potentially contentious.

“If savings can be withdrawn from the Ordinary Account at the age of 55, then the same spirit should apply for the Retirement Sum, in that members should be able to withdraw it at the retirement age of 62,” he said. “What is the rationale for starting payouts at the ages of 65 to 70, when the minimum retirement age is 62?”

Mr Loh also agreed with Dr Ho that the government cannot assume everyone will live beyond 90. He also wanted all the CPF monies be withdrawn at age 70. “Those who prefer to keep their savings in their CPF due to the interest rate can do so by opting in,” he said. “Ultimately, CPF savings belong to the members, and they should have more say in how they can be used.”

Govt continues its stand of non-automatic CPF payout at 65 and avoids talking about paying out everything by 70

Replying, Divisional Director Sim Feng-Ji of the Manpower Ministry disagreed with the views from Dr Ho and Mr Loh.

“Mr Loh asked why payouts start from the age of 65 when the statutory minimum retirement age is 62. Age 62 is not the age workers must stop work, but the age when they are re-employed. Under the law, employers have to offer workers re-employment up to 67. In practice, well over 90 per cent of eligible workers are re-employed at 62,” explained Director Sim.

“As a result, the employment rate of seniors has risen steadily. Today, about four in 10 seniors aged 65-69 are still working,” Director Sim proudly proclaimed.

He said that despite Ms Teo’s recent announcement of raising both retirement and re-employment age, CPF members “will still be able to start receiving their payouts any time from 65”.

With regard to starting payouts automatically at 65, Director Sim argued that it has been a longstanding practice for CPF members to decide when they wish their payouts to begin. “They can do so any time from 65,” he reiterated.

By deferring payouts, Director Sim reminded all that CPF members will get more payouts later. He said, “We do not assume every member wants to start receiving his payouts at 65. There are in fact benefits to starting later. Members will earn more interest. For every year of deferral, members get up to 7 per cent more in payouts. That is up to 35 per cent more for five years of deferral.”

That is, of course, if the CPF members are still alive at 70 to enjoy the extra 35 per cent.

“Starting payouts automatically at 65 means automatically denying members these benefits,” Director Sim asserted.

He also came up with the argument that CPF Board would send reminder letters to a CPF member every year after 65 should he choose not to start his payouts. “It is therefore possible that many CPF members who do not start payouts at 65 have made a conscious choice,” he argued.

But in his reply, Director Sim completely side-stepped the question of CPF Board paying out the entire retirement sum at 70.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

生意难做!客人不守社交距离 餐饮业者忧连累餐厅被关!

生意难做!餐饮业者吐苦水,客人不遵守安全预防规定,业者屡劝不果,还被社交距离官员警告罚款,业者无奈只好举报警察。 在疫情的侵袭下,全球的生活形态也开始改变,人们出门都必须戴上口罩,保持好社交安全距离,但似乎仍有部分人无视这些规定。 Vatos Urban Tacos的创办人兼大厨的美国韩裔金新翰,昨日在脸书直言,一些客户不遵守社交安全举例,即使已经限制每桌人数,但他们仍然会聚集,在三番四次的规劝也仍然不听劝。 他举例,他在南岸的分店就遇到这种“奥客”。两张分坐五人桌的客人,却聚集在一起,即使被他的员工全说了三四次还是不听劝。“每一次我们都有劝他们不要聚集,但他们只会回复”好的好的“,五分钟后,又开始故态复萌。20分钟后,一名社交距离大使进来,并警告我们如果回来再让他看见这样的情形就开罚单,甚至可能被勒令关闭。” “今晚在荷兰村,又有四人桌和三人卓的客人继续并桌交流。我的经理也上前规劝,奈何他们直接忽视,经理只好给出严厉警告。最终我们只能请客人离开。但客人不愿意。” 无可奈何之下,他们只好报警处理,但现场仍然有客人将照片拍下,并表示将会举报违反社交安全距离的行为,让他相当无奈。 他也在文内呼吁客人应该要遵守社交安全距离,因为不仅仅关系到餐厅的营业,更很可能影响了店内员工的生计。 “对于客人而言,或许违反社交安全规定并不那么重要,但对于餐厅而言,它很可能就是面临生死问题。许多餐饮业可能会被罚上高额罚款,还要被强制关闭10天,都可能是导致餐饮业者倒闭的最后稻草。我们许多员工的生计也取决我们对于此事的处理,故不便之处,敬请理解。” 他在文末也道出该欲违反社交安全距离的客人的结果。他表示,该群客人在警察来到前以离开,因为若他们选择不走,可能将会如同之前在罗拔申码头聚集喝酒的人的下场。 “请勿将餐厅置于这样的情况,因为我相信大多数业者将会选择保护自己和员工,而不是一群被驱逐出境的外籍人士。”…

Five metal beams fell from a tower crane, narrowly missing pedestrians and vehicles

Five metal beams, about 6 metres long each, nearly hit pedestrians and…

武汉肺炎病患治愈出院 拍片鼓励病友“要撑下去”

新型冠状性病毒肆虐,目前已在中国境内到国外都已有多人感染,而且死亡人数不停攀升。尽管死亡人数不断飙升,但仍然成功抵住病魔出院案例,让人们在这场斗争中燃起些微的希望。 《澎湃新闻》报道,位于中国湖北荆州的37岁男子李振东,是荆州首例确诊感染的病患,在于病魔争斗16天后,于1月31日成功治愈出院。 随后他也公开自己抗战过程,他表示大致上分为四个阶段。他也指出,自己并没有任何医学基础,但根据自己的亲身感受,将治疗阶段分为四段,并配合医生治疗,希望能给仍在住院的病友提供一定的借鉴。 抗病魔四阶段 第一阶段是自己在医院进行大量的抽血化验,再提取核酸样本、拍胸片和彩超,并根据各项指标制定后期的治疗方案。因此在此阶段,一定要注意营养,因为会持续高烧导致各项器官持续衰竭。 他透露,必须强迫自己去吃东西,因为在不吃东西的状态下,没有营养就不会产生抵抗力。“必须要逼迫自己吃东西,喝水、喝牛奶、吃稀饭、喝汤,必须逼着自己去喝,去吃东西,有营养才有抵抗力免疫力”。 接下来则会进入第二阶段,其维持期将达三至四天,且每日可能将发烧到38至40度左右,因此他劝导正在经历此阶段的病友要有心理准备,并保持信心。一旦撑过该阶段,其病状可能会得到缓解,免疫系统也会反攻,发生作用。 而到了第三阶段则会进入恢复期,医生会根据其身体状况进行大量的药物治疗,因此李振东提醒病友,必须在此阶段谨遵医嘱,按照医生的要求去,将营养跟上,加助恢复身体健康。 第四个阶段,也是最后的阶段,此时身体基本进入安全恢复期。患者需要在医院观察数天,进行核酸检测,若呈阴性说明已无传染征兆,可以等待出院。 李振东坦言,在住院治疗的16天中,内心也曾出现过惶恐和迷惘,但在医护人员的细心照顾下找到了信心和希望,并一路自我鼓励。随着精神不断好转,病情也随之转弱。 他也表示,在对抗的过程中,他挺过来了,而且病魔并不可怕,但自己需要保持乐观的心态,坚持到底,与病魔抗争,一定会战胜病魔,重获新生。 李振东在出院后,还为医院捐赠了防护物资,如今拍视频亦是想要鼓励更多病患能够勇敢面对。有关将近三分钟额视频也被上载到脸书群组Sixth…

披萨送餐员承认撞路人犯过失罪 检方要求对被告执行缓刑

去年,一名披萨送餐员在蔡厝港的行人道上,行驶电动滑板车时撞上一名路人,涉嫌犯下过失罪。昨日被告(12日)认罪,检方要求对被告执行缓刑。 《今日报》报道,据法庭文件显示,去年5月23日,当时正值16岁的被告,以每小时20公里的速度在德惠巷行驶,已超出每小时15公里速度的限行。 被告李世嘉(译音)尽管已承认罪行,但他仍然辩称是54岁受害者当时冲向行人道,随之被法官质疑,认为他当时超速加上路障挡住视线,无法精准判断,因此驳回被告的说法。 据了解,被告的电动滑板车宽度为74厘米,比规定的70厘米还要长,判定该电动滑板车并不符合规定。当时被告骑到路口的时候并没有减速,因此撞倒受害者导致他跌倒,头撞上地板,造成4厘米深的伤口,最后由被告为受害者止血并送往医院。而医疗费用也由被告支付。 基于当时被告超速以及行驶不符合规定的电动滑板车,检察官要求提出缓刑而非罚款,不过检察官也表示,在犯罪期间,被告的年纪仍然相当年轻,因此才会提出缓刑需求。 被告预计在12月10日被裁定罪行。 本月5日开始,电动滑板车已被禁止在行人道上行驶,据交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生表示,基于涉及电动滑板车的事故频繁,11月5日起,电动滑板车被禁止在所有人行道使用。不过,脚车和电动轮椅等代步工具(Personal Mobility Aids),仍可在人行道、脚车道和公园连道使用。 陆交局则表示将予以两个月宽限期,先给那些违例在人行道使用电动滑板车的民众发出警告;从明年1月1日起,违例者一旦罪成,可被罚款最多2000元或坐牢三个月,或两者兼施。