Photo of TuasSpring power plant from Hyflux’s website

Following the High Court’s approval of troubled homegrown water treatment firm Hyflux’s application to convene a scheme meeting with its creditors, the company will be holding the meeting on 5 Apr as a part of its financial restructuring process.

The application was made on 16 Feb jointly with three of Hyflux’s subsidiaries: Hydrochem, Hyflux Engineering and Hyflux Membrane Manufacturing.

The meeting will comprise two classes of creditors: Firstly, unsecured creditors, including medium-term noteholders and 29 banks; secondly, holders of perpetual securities and preference shares.

Channel NewsAsia reported that the voting is likely to take place during two separate meetings on the same day for each creditor class.

At least 50 per cent in number and 75 per cent in value of each creditor class must approve the scheme before 5 Apr in order for it to pass.

“If one class fails, the scheme fails,” Hyflux said, according to The Straits Times.

In the event that the scheme receives the green light from both classes of creditors, an extraordinary general meeting will most likely be convened with ordinary shareholders to vote on the issue of new shares to SMI before 16 Apr.

More than 50 per cent of Hyflux’s ordinary shareholders are required to vote “yes” for the issue of new shares to SM Investments (SMI), a consortium of Indonesia’s conglomerate Salim Group and energy giant Medco Group.

Additionally, Hyflux will be holding a town hall meeting with its shareholders on 13 March.

Hyflux’s reorganisation plan entails the following:

  • Approximately 34,000 registered holders of Hyflux’s perpetual securities and preference shares will receive a total of $27 million in cash and a 10.26 per cent share of the company after the restructuring plan is implemented, with them being owed $900 million by the firm;
  • For every $1,000 invested, a holder of Hyflux’s perpetual securities and preference shares will receive only $106.54, or an implied return rate of 10.7 per cent, which will be distributed in the form of $30.15 in cash payout and $76.39 of implied value in the firm’s shares.
  • Unsecured creditors who do not hold such securities and shares will receive a total of $232 million in cash and 27 per cent of shares;
  • Medium-term holders are expected to receive $246.35 for every $1,000 they have invested, or an implied return rate of 24.6 per cent, which will be distributed in the form of a cash payout of $138.72 and $107.63 of implied value in the company’s shares.
  • Around 60 per cent of Hyflux’s share capital will be handed to SMI, which has agreed to inject $530 million in the firm.

CEO Olivia Lum and BOD to give up shares and entitlements in Hyflux as part of firm’s financial restructuring plan

Previously on 16 Feb, Hyflux’s executive chairperson and group Chief Executive Officer Olivia Lum announced that she, along with Hyflux’s Board of Directors (BOD), will be giving up their shares and entitlements as holders of preference shares and perpetual capital securities as a part of Hyflux’s restructuring plan.

The company indicated that Ms Lum’s shares, as well as those of members of Hyflux’s BOD, will be “distributed solely to all other holders of perpetual capital securities and preference shares of the Company upon completion of the proposed Restructuring Plan”.

Ms Lum said: “This Company was started by myself some 30 years ago, and is very dear and precious to me. This current situation is not something I ever envisioned nor is it something I ever wanted.

“I have volunteered to give up receiving any management shares in the Company. I have also undertaken that if this Restructuring Plan is approved, all of the interests of mine and the other Board members in Hyflux will be given solely to this group.

“In this way, it is my hope that they may reap the future benefits which the Salim-Medco consortium deal can offer them,” she added.

Salaries of key executives frozen since 2016; Olivia Lum’s salary unchanged since 2011: Hyflux, in response to SIAS queries

A day prior to the announcement on 15 Feb, Hyflux had published its answers to the queries posed by the Securities Investors Association Singapore (SIAS) to Ms Lum and the BOD, dated 8 Feb, among which included a query over Ms Lum’s apparent lack of participation in restructuring efforts despite receiving a payment of more than S$60 million in dividends from her 34 per cent ordinary shareholding in the firm.

The statement by SIAS also read that Ms Lum had also “received significant salary, benefits and bonuses and earned between SGD750,000 and SGD1 million in 2017, a year in which Hyflux reported losses of SGD115.6 million”.

The remuneration for key executives has decreased from SGD2.9 million in 2016 to SGD2.7 million in 2017. Since 2016, the salaries of key executives have been frozen, and no variable bonuses have been paid out. Further, since 2011 the CEO’s salary has remained unchanged.

President and CEO of SIAS David Gerald highlighted that during the same period, “Hyflux reported losses of S$115.6 million and a period which was five months prior to Hyflux Group filing for court protection from creditors and when Hyflux has been losing huge amounts of cash and building projects”.

Mr Gerald questioned Ms Lum’s role in the firm’s restructuring efforts, as well as the reasons behind not contributing her gains from Hyflux Group to the restructuring process.

Hyflux indicated in its response that Ms Lum was very much aware of the financial situation of the firm, and that following her knowledge, she “will suffer a significant loss” as “her current equity stake” will be “diluted substantially on the same terms as all other stakeholders, and she will lose her controlling position in the Company”.

“She has also volunteered to relinquish all rights to any management retention shares that would otherwise be awarded to her pursuant to this restructuring process”, added the firm.

He also raised the question as to why the Board continued to pay dividends even “when the operating cash flow was negative and accumulate more debt during this time”, on top of asking “how it was possible that despite the negative operating cash flow, Hyflux continued to report profits in each year” prior to FY2017.

Hyflux, in response, claimed that there have been “inaccuracies recorded in various news articles surrounding Olivia’s dividends from her shareholding in Hyflux.

“In contrast to the newspaper reports and the SIAS narrative suggesting that Olivia had received over SGD 60 million in dividends from her shareholding in Hyflux in 2017, the Company wishes to clarify that she did not receive any cash dividend for financial year 2017.

“Over a period of 10 years from 2007 to 2016, she received about SGD58million in proportional cash dividends declared and paid to shareholders.

“During the same period (2007 to 2016), Hyflux recorded cumulative profit after tax and minority interests of SGD527 million and total ordinary shareholders dividends was SGD186 million,” it added.

Hyflux’s annual report indicated that the firm’s top executives had received a total remuneration of S$2,695,134.20 in the 2017 financial year.

Tuaspring “expected to generate profits from day one”: Hyflux, in response to overvaluation of the plant

Hyflux’s Tuaspring plant was also the subject of scrutiny by SIAS.

Tuaspring provides up to 318,500 m3 or 70 million gallons of desalinated water per day to Singapore’s water supply under a 25-year design build-own-operate arrangement with PUB.

Citing a partially-funded shareholder loan of S$57 million, Mr Gerald raised the question as to how Hyflux had obtained funding for the loan to Tuaspring, as “Tuaspring has been loss-making since it commenced operations in 2015”.

He also probed on the overvaluation of Tuaspring at S$1.4 billion for sale, which he claims has been proven to be “at least S$900 million” over its actual value.

He added that Hyflux has confirmed any bids received in the 2018 sale process for Tuaspring were for less than Maybank’s outstanding project finance debt of approximately S$500 million.

“What is the monthly cash burn at Tuaspring? What are Tuaspring’s current cash reserves? What is the current market value for the Tuaspring asset?” Mr Gerald asked.

Hyflux replied that when it was first awarded the Tuaspring project in 2011, “based on the financial model which modeled the cashflow projections from the project, the power plant was expected to generate profits from day one”.

“This financial model was audited by an external financial model auditor and furnished to the offtaker. In 2013 when Tuaspring was able to secure a non-recourse project financing loan, the lender commissioned an independent market study of the project which arrived at similar conclusions supporting the book value of approximately SGD1.4 billion.

“When the Tuaspring power plant entered into commercial operations in 2016, the lender commissioned another independent market study before the drawdown of the second tranche of the project finance loan, which valuation also then supported the book value ascribed to the Tuaspring project.

“However, while the 2017 divestment process attracted three preliminary non-binding bids that also supported the book value of the project, the 2018 sale process for Tuaspring during the moratorium did not yield a similar bid due to the limited number of parties pre-qualified to perform due diligence at such time,” added the firm.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Disagreeing without being disagreeable

The following is a Facebook entry by Ms Joan Fong, the daughter of…

尚达曼:若本地结构性失业率偏高 或考虑提供失业救济

国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼指出,尽管目前本地失业率仍处于低水平,不过若本地也陷入结构性失业率偏高的现象,救可能得考虑提供失业救济。 尚达曼是在李光耀公共政策学院举办的网上讨论会上,这么表示。他强调我国推出一系列计划,包括为员工进行再培训,让他们尽快重返工作岗位。 截至今年3月,我国居民失业率为3.3巴仙,整体失业率2.4巴仙。 无独有偶,在本届选举竞选宣言,工人党和民主党都有提到,为被裁员工提供援助,工人党倡议冗员保险(Redundancy Insurance),作为现有再培训和再就业配套的补充,为不幸被裁员工铺设社会安全网。 民主党倡议的“重新启动RESTART”援助和重新雇佣计划,建议被裁国人能够持续18个月获得原薪金的一半援助金,即即首半年提供原先工资的75巴仙,第二半年提供一半的工资,以及最后的半年提供原工资的四分一。

历史回顾:1954年5月13日 华校中学生反国民服役和平请愿遭镇压

今日,马来西亚公民社会并没有忘记50年前发生的513事件,有者也前往位于雪兰莪双溪毛糯513罹难者墓园进行公祭,为罹难者默哀,各宗教团体进行宗教仪式。 在我国,1954年的5月13日,在距今65年后的今天,同样是不容忘记的日子。当年一群手无寸铁的华校中学生,在皇家山麓克里门梭道(Clemenceau Avenue)现场,声援八名学生代表会见新加坡总督,提呈表达要求免除18-20岁男学生参与国民服役的请愿书。 功能八号氏族会在脸书专页回顾当年新加坡学运513事件的事迹。当时赴现场支援请愿的,估计有五百至一千名学生。然而后来在镇暴警察以大麻绳、警棍、盾牌和步枪暴力介入时,原本平和的集会被打乱,有许多学生受伤,48人被捕,并被指控阻碍警察办公和拒绝服从疏散指示。 事件发生后,造成更多学生抗议和静坐,迫使中华商会不得不介入学生和英殖民政府之间调解。经过22日的斗争,殖民政府最终妥协,展延国民服役计划。 在50年代初期因“紧急法令”的氛围下,数以千计的华中学生勇敢引领运动,突破殖民者的“白色恐怖”。 学运激励人民争取权益 正是学生们的举动,激发人民团结起来,申诉新加坡人的公民和政治权利。 513事件也促使更广泛的学运席卷和影响华中和之后的南洋大学。 在1954年513事件的两周后,一名马来亚大学学生因出版名为《华惹》(Fajar,意即马来语“黎明”)的刊物,而成为殖民政府警察的眼中钉。该刊物编辑部因一篇《亚洲的侵略》而被提控煽动,此事甚至惊动英女皇律师D N Pritt来狮城,在李光耀协助下为学生辩护。…

MND and PA bankrupt on ideas says WP

the following is a media release from the Workers’ Party on untrue…