The collision between Malaysian government vessel Polaris and Greek vessel Piraeus in the disputed waters off Tuas on Saturday (9 Feb). Source: Singapore Police Force

Singapore’s Port and Maritime Authority (MPA) has issued a rebuttal against the “false online allegations” made by online publication Singapore Herald regarding the recent collision between Malaysian government vessel Polaris and Greek vessel Piraeus in the disputed waters off Tuas, insisting that “there is neither a ‘chief culprit’ nor an ‘arranged’ incident” as claimed by the blog.

SH, formerly known as States Times Review, claimed in a post on Sunday (10 Feb) that “According [to] sources in the shipping industry, preliminary investigations are now pointing to the Singapore government being the chief culprit arranging for the incident as a case to drive Malaysia out of the disputed Johor Straits waters”.

“It is no coincidence, Greece is a bankrupted country with 178.6% of its GDP in government debt.

“Likely chances are that the Singapore dictatorship could have deliberated the sea incident on Saturday (Feb 9), as a form of debt payment,” it added.

SH further alleged: “In the incident at the disputed waters, the first respondent was the Singapore state media who had their cameras prepared for the incident.

“A video was uploaded by the Singapore state media, Straits Times, almost immediately after the incident at 2.26pm.

“The Singapore government also issued an inaccurate press release stating the time of collision at 2.28pm – which is likely an arranged ETA time for the “incident” arranged between the Singapore government and its debtor.

“The Singapore authorities, after all, were the first respondent and even had a video: how could they get the time wrong then?” SH posited.

MPA addressed the alleged discrepancy in the timing reported by The Straits Times and the Singapore government’s press release as claimed by SH, stating the following:

Here are the facts:
1428hrs: PIREAS collided with POLARIS on its way from Singapore to Tanjung Pelepas. The incident was witnessed by PCG patrolling in the vicinity. PIREAS also reported its collision with POLARIS to MPA’s Port Operations Control Centre, and indicated that it had not sustained any damage.

1902hrs: After the facts had been established, MPA released a media statement, along with a photo of the incident.

1903hrs: The Straits Times posted the statement and carried the picture on its online site. It then followed up with a Facebook post at 1907hrs.

2000hrs: Videos of the collision were provided to the media.

SH also alleged that the crew onboard the Piraeus “have taken bribes to arrange the crash as the ship set off in Polaris’s direction, and timing the crash by differing its sailing speed”.

“A check with the vessel speed revealed that the Greek ship informed the Malaysian ship that they will steer clear.

“The Greek crews slowed down the vessel 50 minutes before, but they did not change the course – ostensibly to minimise damage on the deliberate contact,” it charged.

The blog further speculated: “The Singapore authorities, who claimed that the incident took place in their waters, did not attend to the incident – as if they already knew that the crash is nothing serious and there would be no injuries or life-threatening mishaps”.

“Investigators are now looking up finances of the Greek ship owner, Chronos Shipping, and the interactions of the crews at the Singapore harbour,” it concluded.

Consequently, MPA reiterated that investigations are still ongoing, and “strongly urges the public to avoid spreading deliberate online falsehoods”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Someday, today, now!

~ By Suchen Christine Lim ~ It is not “someday”, but today. My best…

How the lack of common sense can destroy a faith

Tracts portray Muslims as spiteful and pawns of the Roman Catholic Church. Terence Lee.

雅虎民调开吴作栋玩笑?80巴仙否定何晶能当好部长

荣誉国务资政吴作栋在英文传记《高难任务:吴作栋传》披露,曾接触过总理夫人何晶,询问她是否有兴趣参政。 “我曾询问何晶是否有意参政,那时她才28、30岁左右,还没嫁给李显龙。”他说,当时他何晶在国防部表现,认为她很有才质。 吴作栋称,知道何晶是总统奖学金得主和在国防部科研部门任职,但对她所知不深。不过后来收到简报了解更多资讯,得知她可以成为一位优秀和与众不同的部长。 “她没有说不,只是认为可以在其他阶段,当时她还年轻,”她告诉吴作栋年龄较大时可能再参政。不过后来他和李显龙结婚了。 吴作栋称,基于她已成为李氏家族的一份子,就再没找过她提起从政一事,因为“李显龙会反对、何晶也不赞同,新加坡人也不赞同。” 不知《雅虎新闻》是否刻意开吴作栋的玩笑,既然后者声称何晶可以成为好部长,那么民众是否这么认为呢?《雅虎新闻》就在前日召开民调,询问网民意见,是否同意吴作栋的观点,认为何晶能成为好部长? 共有5443网民参与民调,只有7巴仙赞同吴作栋的观点,10巴仙认为也许可以,但83巴仙投票者则表示不赞同何晶能当好部长。 有网民在留言中则指出,民调似乎含有讥讽成分;有网民认为,除非何晶能公开淡马锡基金营收、亏损明细,透明化施政才能对人民有交代,或许人民才能考虑她是否适合参政。 网民Stephen则提醒,现今的何晶是不可能去当部长的,她现今的收入至少是其丈夫的十倍。 去年入选福布斯百位富影响力女性 在去年,何晶入选福布斯百位最有影响力女性,排行第28。在2016年排行30、2015年排行43。自2004年以来,一直都在百位最有影响力女性榜单内。 淡马锡控股掌管国家主权基金,但何晶身为CEO的收入,至今仍是个谜。本社曾在8月份的一篇文章,根据淡马锡控股2018年度的86亿元行政开销作出推测,假定CEO的年薪,为行政开销的0.1巴仙,都相当于860万新元。

In a culture of secrecy, no courage is required

Ms. Ho seems to leave a trail of taking huge risks and making even larger losses. Ravi Philemon.