With the recent revelation that the personal information of 14,200 HIV-positive individuals were leaked in a data breach of Singapore’s HIV Registry, discussions have been reignited about the struggles of people living with HIV in Singapore, particularly as it pertains to employment.

Chief Editor of New Naratif, Kirsten Han shared on her Facebook page about gulf between what the law states and what actually happens on the ground for people living with HIV.

In an article by the Straits Times, a Ministry of Manpower (MOM) spokesperson said that the Employment Act protects employees from being terminated on the grounds of their HIV-positive status.

“Singapore has employment laws to protect employees from wrongful dismissal, including on the grounds of HIV,” she says.

However, Singapore law does not expressly prohibit companies from asking job applicants about their HIV status. The Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) says that HIV status should not be explicitly asked for in any declaration of medical condition and no one should be expected to declare their HIV status. SNEF adds that employees should not face any repercussion if they are found to have omitted declaring they are HIV-positive, as their HIV status should not affect their employability.

Unfortunately, this is merely a guideline that companies are not legally compelled to follow.

In response to queries by TODAY, both MOM and the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (Tafep) said that employers should treat employees fairly and based on merit, and not discriminate against any employee just because of his or her HIV status.

“Employers should… assess candidates based on their ability to perform the job. Therefore, if a candidate’s medical condition does not affect his or her ability to perform the job, the medical condition should not be included in the employer’s selection criteria,” a Tafep spokesperson said.

In reality, that is easier said than done. Even though the MOM says that people living with HIV are protected from being terminated due to their status, there is nothing to stop employers from terminating them for failing to disclose their status.

Today Online shared the plight of a person named John (not his real name) who said he was terminated via text message two years ago after the F&B company he worked for found out that he was HIV-positive.

The ground for termination that the company cited were that John was not honest in declaring his health status when applying for the job.

The 27-year-old said, “As much as I want to be honest with myself and also to people, I realise that certain things you can’t be open about it, people are not ready to accept yet.”

You see, the Employment Act simply protects an employee from ‘wrongful dismissal’. In the case of John, he was dismissed not for his HIV-status but for being dishonest on his job application.

But let’s assume John did reveal his HIV status to a prospective employer. Judging by the strong stigma still present in Singapore society surrounding HIV and people living with the virus, John is unlikely to get the job he applied for anyway. The company may not specify that his medical status is the reason they’re passing him up and it would be tough for him to prove it in Court as well.

So maybe we should shift the conversation towards whether or not employers should be demanding such disclosures from their employees and job applicants in the first place. Should a person be compelled to disclose his HIV-status to a prospective employer, even when it’s not material to the job they are applying for?

And in terms of tackling the stigma, we should do more to educate ourselves and society at large about HIV and AIDS. When we better understand what the virus is, how it’s transmitted and what it’s like to live in Singapore as a person with HIV, we can be better neighbours who defend the people in our community facing discrimination in any way, shape or form.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

微型车造型奇特引网民议论 被戏称像“纸扎车”?

今日媒体报导,设计和推广公司QIQGlobal,推出方块形的微型车(Microcar),专门供人们租用来进行短距离路程,只需要2元就可使用半小时,且停靠路边时,它还会自动前往最靠近的充电站充电。 不过,报导才出街,它外表四四方方的可爱造型,反倒引起网民注意,有网民说好像玩具车,也有者戏称,好像是拿幼儿园孩童的涂鸦,来设计这款车。 不过由于临近中元节,一些调皮网民就开玩笑调侃:“我以为是纸做的在路上跑”,有者也笑言:“我曾祖父母开的也是这款”: 有关公司称,由于大部分民众前往乘搭支线巴士(feeder bus)或轻轨列车时,都必须走一段路,希望微型车能够为他们提供方便。 但有者笑言,“纸扎车”也是能帮人“走完最后一程”。 当然也有提出实质建议的,例如提及榜鹅的交通已经很拥挤,兴许可以在其他地区试行;以及询问驾驶这种微型车,是否需要执照?有鉴于过去推行个人代步工具通行引来的问题,当局又要如何避免交通事故的发生?

PM Lee Hsien Loong on overseas leave until 31 December

Prime Minister Office (PMO) has announced on Tuesday (19 December) that Prime…

【武汉冠状病毒】新电信一职员确诊 受影响楼层关闭消毒

新电信(Singtel)发表声明证实,该公司其中一名职员,昨晚(5日)确诊患上武汉冠状病毒。 有关职员在新电信电信中心Comcentre一号大楼,第20楼上班。致使新电信需关闭有关楼层进行消毒。 据了解,上述职员最后一次上班时上周三(26日),此后就请病假。不过,同一楼层办公的员工都被指示需在家办公两周,卫生部已启动追踪调查曾与确诊者接触的相关人士。 新电信指出,自我国在上月初把警戒级别上调至橙色以来,就已落实分开工作,减低接触感染风险,以及限制旅游出行、限制公司访客、在公众场所准备消毒液和体温监测等。 根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月5日中午12时,本地新增五起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,累计确诊病例已多达117例。

Singapore Parliament to be live-streamed for the first time, to be made available on Infocomms Ministry YouTube channel

Proceedings in the Singapore Parliament will be live-streamed for the first time…