Photo credit: marksabatojp.blogspot.com

Crematorium workers who take red packets from grieving families and funeral directors who pass them on to workers are now in trouble with the authorities for this practice at the government-run Mandai Crematorium.

Last week, more than 20 employees from private funeral businesses and crematorium workers have reportedly been questioned by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), said Shin Min Daily on Friday (1 February).

If that is not all, checks by The Straits Times (ST) also found that at least three workers from different companies were called in for questioning by the CPIB last week, while another two were brought in as witnesses of the practice. The three were later released on a bail of S$20,000 each.

The CPIB and National Environment Agency (NEA), which runs the Mandai Crematorium, acknowledged that investigations are being carried out.

NEA revealed that it received news late last year that some Mandai Crematorium staff had allegedly been accepting red packets from funeral directors while at work. “NEA takes a serious view of these allegations and immediately reported the matter to the Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau (CPIB) for their follow-up,” said a spokesman.

However, some industry insiders wondered why investigations are happening now, as the illegal practice has been rising discreetly for decades, and the funeral directors merely pass the red packets to workers on behalf of families.

Chinese and Indian families voluntarily give such packets, as it is seen as an auspicious gesture to “bless” the workers with good luck, funeral directors told ST. Generally, families give sum ranging from S$2 to S$50, although they are expected to give about S$20 or S$24, which is the “market rate” for such red packets, they added.

The funeral directors emphasised that they do not prompt the families to give the red packets, and some of them give packets without even asking. In addition, funeral directors do not receive any benefits from passing these packets to the crematorium workers, and there is no preferential treatment given to those who do so, they claimed.

“The whole process of cremation is very systematic. It’s not as though by giving them an “ang pow”, we will get better times (for cremation) or better treatment,” said a funeral director.

President of the Association of Funeral Directors Ang Zi Sheng, claimed that he found out about the investigation only from the Chinese papers.

“We encourage members and public to comply with regulations set out by NEA of not giving any gifts of any nature to crematorium staff,” said Mr Ang.

Upon reading this news, many netizens have expressed their disagreement towards this matter. They all felt that it was the families’ way of appreciating the workers and they’re giving out red packets out of goodwill.

However, Facebook user Chen Hwey Fang feels that this practice is not right and the workers should not accept bribes as they’re paid a salary for the job that they’re doing.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

政府每年提供大学外籍生奖学金1.3亿元

我国教育部宣布在过去五年,每年花费1亿3000万新元,为就读于本地学校和自治大学的国际学生提供奖学金。 工人党非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)在国会中,针对就读于新加坡学校和大学的国际学生,询问教育部长在过去五年里,我国政府每年花费在他们身上的奖学金和其他形式的经济支援总支出。 对此教育部长王乙康于周一(7月8日)透过书面回答,我国政府确实为国际学生提供少量奖学金,每年总支出高达1亿3000万新元。 仅占教育部年度预算一巴仙 王乙康指出,就一般而言,我国国际学生所获得的资助比本地学生少,大部分教育部的支出,都用于我国公民的教育。本地学校的政府财政资金和本地大专机构的政府资助奖学金,也仅限于我国公民可以申请。 他随后表示,政府的确为就读于我国学校和自治大学的国际学生提供少量奖学金。有关的奖学金总值相当于教育部年度预算的130亿元中的一巴仙,即1.3亿元。 “对于获得奖学金的国际学生,教育部每学期都密切监督他们的学业成绩。若有学生的表现不尽如人意,将会撤销其奖学金。” 他指出,获得奖学金的国际大学生也有义务,于毕业后在我国工作长达六年。其中,有部分国际学生最终选择申请并获得永久居留权,有的学生甚至获得公民身份。 他表示,世界上每个教育系统都会为国际学生提供一些各方面的支持,我国国民的升学路上,也受益于外国赞助的奖学金。 “这是国际教育系统网络中的常态。” 王乙康回答不完整…

砂公民多次投报要查泰益 敦马:有举报才能行动

马来西亚首相敦马哈迪声称,执法单位只有接获正式投报,才能针对砂拉越最高元首敦丕显斯里泰益玛目,进行调查是否在任首长期间,涉及滥权舞弊。 不过敦马这番说词,立即遭到公正党砂巴南区部秘书丹尼斯阿隆(Dennis Along)打脸。当地希盟成员联同原住民权益组织,约150人在本月6日,前往美里反贪污委员会办公处抗议,并正式举报泰益玛目。   “我们不清楚敦马是真的不知道,还是有意维护泰益,我们已呈交文件给反贪会,后者说需要7天的工作时间处理,不过很明显现在都快一个月了。” 丹尼斯阿隆还补充,今早透过手机查询,显示反贪会确实已收到举报,为此不明白敦马还在等谁举报。 呼吁更多受害者提供证据 他指控,前首长泰益掌权32年间,涉及许多舞弊,特别是许多原住民的习俗地都被侵占。他呼吁更多受害者勇敢站出来,提供更多证据给反贪会。 “我们希望反贪会调查泰益的嫌疑,至今他归为砂州元首,仍享有许多砂政府资源,如政府官邸和交警开路等,一旦开档调查,泰益就不应获得这些特别待遇。” 时评员法兰西保罗在《当今大马》专栏,抨击砂反贪会“在睡觉”,如果马来西亚真的进入新时代,积极打贪,反贪会是时候动员起来,因为仍有许多涉及贪腐和滥权的领袖逍遥法外。 “很明显布城的反贪会已经忙得不可开交,那么砂拉越的呢?我近期没有听到有任何重大案件在审理。砂州好像一片太平,但其实很多问题,这才是我担心的。” 他直言,比纳吉更贼的大盗就在砂拉越,贪腐的情况仍很严重,但是砂反贪会却选择沉默。…

Temasek’s investment in Thailand shaken

This article is published by Bangkok Post on 5 February 2011. The…

社论:闪耀人权光辉的中华传统思想

有读者向本社反映,人权是“舶来品”,是老外搞的一套,争取、崇尚人权形同崇洋媚外。这似乎是说,中华传统思想中,并没有“以人为本”的信念,此言差矣。 那么,在中华传统思想中,有“人权”的概念吗?找遍中华古代经典肯定是没有“人权”一词的,应是近代直接由“human right”翻译而来。虽然人权人权是西方文化的产物,但是我们老祖宗的智慧,却在千百年前就闪耀着人权的光辉。 在中国古代社会中,关于尊重人的基本生存权、平等和和谐共处的精神,在中华传统文化中非常丰富,信手捏来:己所不欲勿施于人,若别人不愿意,绝不强加事物在他人身上,其实就是敬重彼此权益的一种体现。以下我们再举些例子: 孟子:民为贵,社稷次之,君为轻 就是把百姓福祉放在首位,其次是社会发展,再来才是领袖。其实这都体现了儒家思想中,重视人民百姓、仁爱世人的主张,把人的权益放在首位。 其他类似倡议人民权益的说法,还有“民为邦本,本固邦存”,“君以民存,亦以民亡”、“天下为公”。“天下非一人之天下也,天下之天下也”等等。 所以如果古代天子施暴政失民心,人民处在水生火热中,很容易造成农民起义,推翻暴政,改朝换代。 有教无类 — 平等的受教育权利 不分贫富贵贱,都有受教育的权利,所以我们的先辈下南洋,仍然不忘教育,兴办学府让莘莘学子求取学问,成人成才为国做贡献。…