Aloysius Pang (Image from NoonTalk Media / Facebook)

Following the death of Singaporean actor and reservist Corporal First Class (National Service) Aloysius Pang on Wednesday (23 Jan) after sustaining serious injuries while carrying out repair works inside the Singapore Self-Propelled Howitzer (SSPH) in New Zealand, the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) has issued a clarification regarding the safety record and standard operating procedures (SOP) of the SSPH.

In a statement published on the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) ‘s website on Wednesday (30 Jan), SAF said: “The SSPH is a 155mm, 39 calibre, tracked howitzer developed by ST Engineering Land Systems, and commissioned in 2003”.

“In the last 15 years of SSPH operations, there has not been any reported injury of servicemen due to the gun lowering for maintenance or operating in or firing of the SSPH.

“Over the last 15 years, more than 1,000 servicemen, NSmen and regulars, have been trained to operate the SSPH and around 12,500 rounds fired,” added SAF.

COI convened to “investigate the circumstances leading to the death” of CFC (NS) Pang

SAF also announced in its statement that a “Committee of Inquiry (COI) was convened on 25 January 2019 by the Armed Forces Council to investigate the circumstances leading to the death of Corporal First Class (National Service) [CFC (NS)] Pang Wei Chong, Aloysius”.

“For this COI, a judge nominated by the State Court will be Chairman and its other members include a consultant medical specialist, a member of the External Review Panel on SAF Safety (ERPSS), a member of the Workplace Safety and Health Council, and a senior-ranked National Serviceman,” added the Armed Forces.

In a bid to assure the public that the investigations will be conducted as fairly and as independently as possible, SAF stressed that “None of the COI members work within MINDEF or are SAF regulars”.

“Since June last year, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) included serving or ex-judges as persons eligible to chair the COI, in addition to senior civil servants,” said SAF.

Elaborating on the role of the COI into CFC (NS) Pang’s death, SAF said: “The COI has full powers and access to material and witnesses to investigate the circumstances leading to the death, determine the contributory factors and make recommendations to rectify any lapses uncovered to enhance safety of training and operations.”

“The COI will submit its report in full to the ERPSS for comments, questions, and views. The ERPSS will provide a written report on the COI findings, which will be made public,” SAF added.

SAF concluded its statement with an announcement regarding the upcoming delivery of a Ministerial Statement by Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen in Parliament next month “to address the recent National Service training deaths”. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

坐拥95亿元储备金 读者:国大欠人民一个解释

上月28日,本地媒体揭发新加坡国立大学坐拥95亿储备金,在去年3月底结束的财政年度中,收到2亿2700万元捐款,并赚取6亿200元的投资收入,成为我国最成功的筹款机构。 报导引起民间关注,此前亦有民众质疑,大学如果已拥有大量储备金,不明白大学还需要捐款者捐献的原因。“慈善捐款的饼就这么大,如果拿下一大块,就意味着留给其他慈善机构的就不多了。到底捐款和储备金,要多少才算足够?” 旅居台湾的博客鄞义林也曾评述,政府资助这些公共大学,但新加坡本地学府也是征收最贵学费的地区之一。 “换言之,国人已经为教育缴纳足够的税赋,然而行动党政府还要人民承担更多学费(全球第五贵),这些学府赚有盈余,反观不少毕业生毕业后需面对负债,这公平么?” 对于这些质疑声音,此前国大发言人曾解释,大学利用储备金赚取投资收入,用于资助不同的运作费,如奖学金、支持研究和推广企业化;大学也需要继续筹款让储备金处于健康水平,才能加强长期的财务可持续性。 在本月22日,再有另一读者陈文发(译音)在《海时》撰文,再度质疑国大坐拥的巨额储备金,理应用来应对学费增长的问题;也认为国大欠人民一个解释,究竟累积95亿元储备金要作何用? 他指出,一般非政府组织的标准是累积两年的储备,但国大的储备难道没有限制?他也吁请国大应暂停募款,直至其储备降至一定数额位置。 对此,国大高级副教务长陈清贤教授特别在《海时》论坛答复陈文发的质问,解释截至去年3月31日财年,95亿储备金的架构: 其中有59亿元是捐赠基金(Endowed funds) 特定用途的非捐赠金捐献约八亿元 累计运营盈余28亿元(占30巴仙)…

Japan confirms two death cases for coronavirus from Diamond Princess cruise

The coronavirus-hit Diamond Princess cruise ship confirmed its first death case for…

Local cat cafe investigated over death of cats and lack of training

Cuddles cat cafe, a local cat cafe is said to be investigated…

Malaysia GE15 candidates slam requirement to apply permit for election walkabouts

MALAYSIA — Several candidates contesting in Malaysia General Election 15 (GE15) have…