Source: Singapore Police Force.

10 liquor outlets, out of 18 outlets, in Little India were caught selling alcohol during restricted hours in Little India during the enforcement operation which took place between 5 and 27 January.

The police said on Monday (28 January) that three of those outlets were repeat offenders, and some had allowed customers to consume alcohol within their premises during restricted hours.

Investigations into the errant outlets are ongoing.

According to the police, advisory stickers were also issued to liquor outlets in Little India to remind owners and members of the public that the sale of liquor is prohibited during restricted hours and that actions will be taken against the operators for flouting the rules and regulations under the Liquor Control Act,” police added.

The Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act, which came into force in 2015, is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that regulates the supply and consumption of liquor at public places, and to make consequential and related amendments to certain other written laws. The law is designed specifically to deter recurrences of the 2013 Little India riot that took place with mobs under the influence of alcohol.

The Act prohibits the sale of liquor at retail outlets and consumption of liquor in public places between 10.30 pm and 7 am daily and there are also stricter rules for Geylang and Little India, which are designated Liquor Control Zones, where retailers cannot sell alcohol from 7 pm on Saturday to 7 am on Monday.

Delivery of liquor must also be made in accordance with the trading hours specified in the liquor licence. Offences committed within the liquor control zones (LCZs) will result in a penalty of one and a half times that in non-designated areas.

Violators that are caught drinking may be fined up to S$1,000, while repeat offenders may be fined up to S$2,000 including three months of imprisonment. Retailers that sell alcohol during the curfew hours may be fined up to S$10,000.

Some netizens went to mainstream media comment section, criticising the law that was put in place after the Little India Riot.

Peter See wrote, “One riot in singapore whole Singapore cannot drink after 10.30 pm. Another Police scholars decision?”

Ronnie Ronnie wrote, “One incident, handled badly by the authorities, followed by usual overreaction, banning of alcohol with little regard for small businesses.
Coupled with rising business cost, how are these shops to survive without flouting the rules?
The authorities should look into helping them find a solution instead of just fining them.”

Ken Han wrote, “Personally not a fan of this knee-jerk reaction from the government in 2013. After nearly 6yrs, I curious if there is enough data to show reduction of alcohol fuelled crimes to justify the disruption to the small businesses and the reduction in the quality of Singaporean lives. The data needs to be properly analysed to demonstrate that this restriction has not simply shifted alcohol fuelled crimes to earlier in the night. Or even worse, the time restriction has modified comsumer behaviours, resulting in higher rate of alcohol fuelled crimes.”

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

黄循财:需在居民立场取得平衡 黄国光称不放弃争取组屋合法养猫

义顺集选区议员黄国光昨日(7日)表示,不会放弃争取组屋内合法养猫。 国家发展部长黄循财在本月6日透过书面答复议员提问,指政府必须在养宠物的居民与拒养宠物的居民之间取得平衡,不负责任放养宠物可能有碍社区整洁,严重可能造成邻里不睦。 他指可能“有碍整洁”的情况,包括宠物脱毛、宠物在公共场所随意大小便、以及喂养流浪猫等。 黄循财也指出,尽管这些不负责任行为很有可能会出现,但也不排除组屋内仍有爱猫、且愿意为居民居住环境着想的居民。因此建屋局将会与国家公园管理局,以及兽医服务持续检讨和改善宠物所有权政策。 随后,黄国光于脸书上发文表示,尽管此次争取不成功,但仍未能阻止他持续推行组屋内养猫的想法。 “看起来,对于建屋局而言,组屋内养猫仍然不行,但我会持续坚持下去,为组屋养猫持续发声。” 义顺集选区议员黄国光多年来关注动物相关议题,也是动保团体Animal Concerns Research and Education Society(简称ACRES)的创始人兼首席执行官。…

SPP’s Jose Raymond presents goodie bags in Potong Pasir ahead of Xmas

For the second consecutive year, Chairman of the Singapore People’s Party (SPP)…

王瑞杰告诉外媒:淡马锡和政府投资公司 没任人唯亲问题

在上周五(本月17日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰接受瑞士媒体《新苏黎世报》(Neue Zürcher Zeitung)专访,被问及尽管新加坡有选举制度,但仍一党专政的问题。 《新苏黎世报》问道,“难道现在还不是开放更多民主与政治竞争的成熟时机吗?” 对此王瑞杰则辩护,新加坡拥有自由公平的选举制度,许多政党都有角逐上届选举,其中行动党有五名国会议员席位失守。 “这算是民主吗?我觉得是。而我们也确实尊重这个结果。事实上,我们执政党多年来赢得选举,与压迫无关,而是因为我们谨遵承诺,也赢得新加坡公民的信任。” 《新苏黎世报》接著追问,王瑞杰是否认为新加坡更适合一党专政,而且该如何避免因一党专政,而带来任人唯亲的问题。 王瑞杰则强调,果断的治理和领导能力至关重要。 “就好比我们国家,拥有自己的主权财富基金淡马锡控股和新加坡政府投资公司(GIC),作为财政部长我不曾干预过他们的投资决策。这是因为如果我干预,将没办法确保他们对自身的表现负责。”王瑞杰说。 他续指,“在宪法下,身为财政部长,我必须向国会负责;而我则必须要求主权基金的领导者负责。我们有严格的规章对付裙带关系,以及强硬打击贪腐的律法。” 王瑞杰:新加坡需建立和谐团结氛围 当被问及目前新加坡面临的何种挑战时,他则回答,最大的挑战是建立于维持“和谐与团结”的氛围,尤其现在全世界面临巨大与快速的改变。…

NTUC proposes conditional unemployment payouts for older workers which is similar to proposal made by WP in its GE2020 manifesto

The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has made a suggestion to provide…