Last Wed (16 Jan), a member of the public, Albert Tang, wrote to ST Forum asking why SP Group didn’t offer the heavily discounted electricity rates, which many of the electricity retailers are currently offering to the public, in the first place.

“Given that electricity retailers are looking to make a profit, have spent a significant amount on marketing costs and are still able to offer consumers electricity rates that are a good 20 to 30 per cent lower than SP Group’s, why doesn’t SP Group just offer consumers these lower rates in the first place?” he asked.

Indeed, according to moneysmart.sg, one can get a fixed discount of as much as 25% off the regulated tariff from SP Group for floating rates. For fixed price plans, it can be even higher at 30% discount.

Mr Tang continued, “Many of the 13 or so retailers participating in the OEM do not generate their own power, instead claiming to buy in bulk from power plants to sell to consumers. As the largest bulk buyer of electricity, SP Group should benefit the most from economies of scale, and be able to pass the savings on to consumers.”

“It is hard to understand the logic behind creating the OEM and getting so many retailers to compete for consumers, when SP Group is in a position to bypass this step to sell electricity directly to consumers at more competitive rates,” he added.

Indeed, many netizens are also wondering if SP Group has overcharged the public all this while.

EMA: Current lower prices offered by retailers due to electricity production capacity exceeds demand

In response to Mr Tang’s letter, Ms Dorcas Tan, Director of Market Development and Surveillance Department of the Energy Market Authority (EMA), replied on ST Forum today (‘Why electricity retailers’ rates are better‘,23 Jan).

She said that the regulated tariff, charged by SP Group and approved by EMA, reflects the “long-term costs of producing and delivering electricity in Singapore”.

Such long-term costs include the costs of building and operating the power plants and maintaining the power grid, she added.

“On the other hand, the electricity rates offered by retailers typically reflect the current market conditions, level of competition and short-term costs of producing electricity,” she said.

“Under current market conditions where electricity production capacity exceeds demand for electricity, we can expect market prices to be lower than the regulated tariff. However, this may change over time based on market demand and supply.”

That is to say, the current low prices offered by the electricity retailers are due to over-capacity supplied from SP Group.

But she cautioned that retailers, like all businesses, may adjust their prices and discounts over time.

So, the question remains, if SP Group — which is owned by Temasek — has been over-generating electricity all these while, why didn’t it lower the electricity tariff for Singaporeans in the first place, instead of allowing them to suffer with the high cost of living in Singapore for the last many years?

Indeed, according to blogger Philip Ang after he combed through every SP Group’s annual report since 2005, he has discovered that SP Group has been making an average of almost S$1 billion for some 13 years. From 2005 to 2017, its annual net profit averaged almost S$1 billion.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“捍卫自由律师团”提告尚穆根 遭马国高庭撤销

马国高庭撤销当地人权律师组织“捍卫自由律师团”,对我国内政部长尚穆根提出的告诉。此前,尚穆根曾援引援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),下令更正有关“捍卫自由律师团”的一篇文章。 今年1月16日,“捍卫自由律师团”发表一则声明,指责樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。 内政部驳斥相关内容,并强调政府不遗余力确保执法严格遵守法律程序,而执刑也都有监狱长或一名医生在场等。尚穆根更于22日援引 《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法令》,对该组织发出更正指令,并称文章内容不属实驳斥相关内容。 1月24日,“捍卫自由律师团”入禀法庭,要求马国法院裁决,尚穆根无法用防假消息法,对身在马国的“捍卫自由律师团”采取行动。该组织认为,此举如同把欺压性质的打假新闻法令,也对马国的言论伸出触角。 新加坡内政部今日(1日)也发布文告,该组织虽然提告尚穆根,但后续却未向他发出诉讼令状。反观该法庭文件也过期,而“捍卫自由律师团”也停止更新相关申请。有鉴于此,马国高庭上周一(21日)撤销了相关告诉。 文告指出,“捍卫自由律师团”曾指出将会提供证据证明,但却尚未有任何行动,基于该组织并未采取后续法律行动,因此足以证明目前所采取的法律行动是毫无根据的。

K Shanmugam: POFMA does not disadvantage alternative parties in the coming GE, but instead encourages greater democracy

The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) does not disadvantage…

A Charity, but why has Singapore Environment Council not posted its financial returns on its website for public scrutiny?

As a registered charity with an Institution of Public Character (IPC), the…

Great Eastern pledges S$1 million support package to help customers who are affected by COVID-19

Last Friday (14 Feb), leading insurer Great Eastern announced that it is…