CPF Board has come out to strongly deny that the government had quietly shifted the “retirement payout age” from 65 to 70, in a media report today (20 Jan).

CPF Board’s denial came in response to a recent message circulating online. Someone had posted a picture of a mail he received from CPF Board, notifying him that if would like to receive his CPF payouts starting at 70 years old, he did not have to do anything. However, if he intends to receive his payouts starting at 65, he would still need to inform the CPF Board.

CPF Board told the media that the payout eligibility age for the Retirement Sum Scheme is 65 for those born from 1954 onwards and this has not changed since it was announced in 2007. With regard to the mail posted online, a CPF Board spokesman clarified that the letter was sent to CPF members to inform them that they can start their monthly payouts by completing an application form with their bank account details or to apply online.

“They can apply to start their payouts any time between the ages of 65 and 70. If they do not wish to start payouts before age 70, they need not do anything” and “members who defer the start of their payouts will benefit from getting more retirement savings with the attractive interest that they earn on their CPF savings,” said the spokesman.

The spokesman also said that the CPF Act was amended in 2016 to allow for this automatic payout arrangement, which took effect in Jan 2018. The automatic starting of payouts at age 70 “helps to simplify the activation process for members so they can start to enjoy a retirement income from their CPF savings,” the spokesman added.

However, the spokesman avoided mentioning why the government did not consider starting the automatic payout arrangement at age 65 instead, since this is the official minimum age when a member is eligible for CPF payouts.

Indeed, retiree Johnny Wong, 66, interviewed by the media said that payouts should be automatic when an individual turns 65 years old, and he can have the choice to opt out if he does not want the payout yet, Mr Wong added. In other words, change the default to the other way.

“There may be some who are illiterate or who may not understand how the current scheme works,” Mr Wong said.

CPF Board also posted on its Facebook denying that the government had quietly shifted the “retirement payout age” from 65 to 70. It presented its “facts” on Facebook and asked users to share its post presumably to counter “online rumours”.

“You may have recently come across social media posts and messages that claim that the Government has quietly shifted the ‘retirement payout age’ to 70 for the Retirement Sum Scheme (RSS). This is not true and here are the facts. Do share this with your friends and loved ones,” CPF Board posted on its Facebook page.

However CPF Board wants to present its “facts”, the fact remains that CPF Board only arranges for automatic payout at age 70 and not 65. If a member wants his payouts to start at 65, he must inform CPF Board to do so, something which Mr Wong has highlighted that many illiterate elderly may not know.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP to hold second installment of Talks Series featuring veteran architect Tay Kheng Soon on 16 Dec

The Progress Singapore Party (PSP)’s Talks Series returns with its second installment,…

【选举】毕丹星指不灵活且条件苛刻 年长者遭医疗援助边缘化

毕丹星指出我国现有的医疗系统不够灵活,且很多医疗援助配套都没有保护到年长者,否则就是申请条例太苛刻,没有维护到这些无稳定收入银发一族的利益和尊严。 工人党秘书长兼阿裕尼集选区候选人毕丹星在网上直播中,分享一名七旬阿裕尼居民,大卫(David)所面对的医疗费课题。大卫因中风而住院,选择了C级病房,住院费约4000元,扣除了政府补贴和保健储蓄户头,他还要自掏腰包还上数百元医药费。因此,他很纳闷,为什么他的终身健保没有“帮忙付费”,甚至不能共用保健储蓄虎头的余额来支付数百元医药费。 毕丹星指出,虽然大部分医药费已经由政府支付,但是剩余项目价格也需要500元左右,对于退休人士却仍在工作的年长者而言,这是一笔巨额。他补充,灵活保健储蓄户头虽然允许60岁或以上人民,提款200元以下,以缴付门诊治疗费,但是这远远不够。 他希望卫生部能够为这些年长者们,做出更多。该党在不直接影响财政的前提下,提出了很多改革建议,希望能够更具体地缓解和减轻我国乐龄人士的焦虑,更希望执政者在制定政策时,能够设身处地得为他们着想,而不是闭门造车。

Worker dies after crashing through ceiling at Tampines Mall

A worker has died after falling through a false ceiling at Tampines…

NTUC Income, Great Eastern Life, Prudential refuse to reveal remuneration of their top execs

It was earlier reported that the Singapore Medical Association (SMA) had issued…