Left: Marina Bay Sands construction yard taken on April 18 2009. Right: Marina Bay Sands Hotel at Night, 6 January 2019 (Image on right by RoBird/Shutterstock)

Hashtags and challenges have become part of internet culture – spanning across most, if not all, social media platforms. The latest trend on the Internet of Things is of course the #10yearchallenge where people share on social media two photos of themselves side by side, taken 10 years apart.

It started right around the New Year and picked up traction fairly quickly. I joined in on the fun too. After all, nostalgia is a powerful force. And besides, there’s no harm in posting another selfie, right?

Well, author and Associate Professor at UC Berkely, Kate O’Neill had a different perspective on the seemingly nonthreatening trend. After reading this, you might want to rethink joining in the fun of the #10yearchallenge.

In a series of tweet, Ms O’Neill shared a rather ominous possibility of how the #10yearchallenge provides a ripe data mining opportunity to tech companies who could use the photo comparisons to train facial recognition algorithms on age progression and age recognition.

The original tweet garnered a lot of attention. People were either deeply disturbed by this revelation or were rather nonchalant about it. Those who were unfazed cited the fact that these photos already exist online, so it’s not like the challenge adds any extra data.

Ms O’Neill contends that just putting those two photos together – one from 10 years ago, and one current – already streamlines the data. The challenge essential provides a broad data set of photos taken a fixed number of years apart. It’s much more reliable than simply extracting data from photos posted in the past, which tend not to be chronological.

So in essence, this data provided here is actually very, very helpful if you want to train a facial recognition algorithm on age-related characteristics.

Ms O’Neill goes on to say that the potential of facial recognition technology – a reliable and well-developed one – varies. Elaborating on this in an article on Wired, she posits three uses of the technology.

The first, more benign use, is the implementation of facial recognition in age progression in finding missing children. She highlighted the case in New Delhi last year when the police reportedly tracked down nearly 3,000 missing children in a matter of days with the help of facial recognition technology. And with some of the children having been missing for a while, the age progression aspect really helped.

The other potential of facial recognition is its use in advertising. For example, using age recognition for targeted advertising by using cameras or sensors to adapt the messaging for different age-groups. While this is a less exciting scenario, this could lead to some creepy interactions.

Have you ever talked about buying something and then suddenly see ads to that exactly same thing on every webpage you visit online? Yeah, like that but worse.

Going further, Ms O’Neill suggests that age progression could eventually be factored into insurance assessment and health care. So if you seem to be aging faster than your cohorts, insurance companies might not deem you to be a good insurance risk and charge you a higher premium.

Back in 2016, Amazon has introduced real-time facial recognition services which they sold to law enforcement and government agencies. But that raised privacy concerns as the software enabled authorities to track not just people who have committed crimes but anyone else they deemed a nuisance such as protestors. I’m sure you can see what a slippery slope this can be, especially without proper oversight.

So I don’t know about you, but that certainly worries me. On the one hand, technology will advance whether you join in the #10yearschallenge or not. After all, is it estimated that by 2020 more than half the earth’s population would be connected to the Internet of Things. It’s also getting tougher to live in the modern world and stay disconnected. On the other hand, it seems Facebook now knows me better than I know myself.

Speaking of Facebook, someone suggested that they were the ones behind the #10yearschallenge, socially engineering a meme for the purposes of data mining. However, they’ve denied any involvement in the creation of that trend.

“This is a user-generated meme that went viral on its own,” a Facebook spokesperson responded. “Facebook did not start this trend, and the meme uses photos that already exist on Facebook. Facebook gains nothing from this meme (besides reminding us of the questionable fashion trends of 2009). As a reminder, Facebook users can choose to turn facial recognition on or off at any time.”

Phew.

But regardless of the origin or intent behind this meme, Ms O’Neil asserts that people need to “become savvier about the data we create and share, the access we grant to it, and the implications for its use”.

Because as much as we should hold demand that business treat our data with respect, we should do the same.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Govt accepts recommendations of Active Mobility Advisory Panel; restricts speed limit for PMDs to 10km/h on footpaths

The Ministry of Transport (MOT) has announced that it has accepted all…

微型车造型奇特引网民议论 被戏称像“纸扎车”?

今日媒体报导,设计和推广公司QIQGlobal,推出方块形的微型车(Microcar),专门供人们租用来进行短距离路程,只需要2元就可使用半小时,且停靠路边时,它还会自动前往最靠近的充电站充电。 不过,报导才出街,它外表四四方方的可爱造型,反倒引起网民注意,有网民说好像玩具车,也有者戏称,好像是拿幼儿园孩童的涂鸦,来设计这款车。 不过由于临近中元节,一些调皮网民就开玩笑调侃:“我以为是纸做的在路上跑”,有者也笑言:“我曾祖父母开的也是这款”: 有关公司称,由于大部分民众前往乘搭支线巴士(feeder bus)或轻轨列车时,都必须走一段路,希望微型车能够为他们提供方便。 但有者笑言,“纸扎车”也是能帮人“走完最后一程”。 当然也有提出实质建议的,例如提及榜鹅的交通已经很拥挤,兴许可以在其他地区试行;以及询问驾驶这种微型车,是否需要执照?有鉴于过去推行个人代步工具通行引来的问题,当局又要如何避免交通事故的发生?

Online users disappointed with LTA for only now considering to ban PMDs with no safety certification

Following a series of fire incidents involving personal mobility devices (PMDs) that…

川金峰会期间5韩请愿者被捕 新国严法对外籍一视同仁

五名南韩妇女在本月11日晚,前往金正恩下榻的瑞吉酒店附近请愿,被新加坡警方以制造混乱,和多番不听取警方警告,援引《公共秩序法》逮捕。 新加坡警方声明,这批请愿者是在东陵路和那森路交接处,于晚上9时10分被捕。她们的请愿地点正好靠近朝鲜领导人金正恩一行下榻的瑞吉酒店。 据《海峡时报》报导,警方曾劝阻和警告他们,不能在以上管制地区示威请愿,惟后者不愿给予合作,开始吵嚷大声喊叫。鉴于对方持续引发骚动且屡劝不听,警方才实施逮捕。 《2009年公共秩序法案》规定,户外公众游行与集会必需在活动前的至少14天,通知警方跟获得警察许可,否则视为非法。只有室内集会可在无需警方许可下,能自由进行。 仿效伦敦海德公园,新加坡演说者角落是本国唯一不需警方许可,可自由使用、供民众集会的地方。但是,任何人在演说者角落举行活动/请愿之前,还得在国家公园局通过在线方式注册自己的个人信息,该地区周边也有许多闭路监控设备,形同变相的监视。 再者,即使只有一人举着牌子请愿或为任何政治原因(比如,抗议公积金)而静坐,该法也视为非法集会。至于至少5000人参加的公开活动,和上万人参加的私人活动,主办单位必须在活动前的至少28天,通知警方。 近期发生的5名韩籍请愿者被捕事件,显示新国《公共秩序法》对待本国与外籍人士都一视同仁。若外籍人士前来声援或参与本国的人权或社会议题请愿,都有可能被对付。 新、台、马集会比较 在马来西亚举办集会,也需向警察申请准证,警方有权不批准任何地点、时间主题不适合的集会,或会要求主办方更改地点。 马来西亚经历4次干净选举联盟集会以及其他大大小小和平请愿运动,集会者态度已日趋成熟,惟每次的集会都需与警方斡旋、角力。 为了确保集会者安全,也不得随意越过警方防线以及遵守已订立的解散时间,大部分集会者都懂得表现克制,尽量避免留学冲突。 前朝政府在推出《2012年和平集会法令》,企图进一步管制民间发起的集会权利,不过马国上诉庭在2014年一项标志性裁决,捍卫马国人民的集会权利。…