Source : en.wikipedia.org

In a report on forced labour in the domestic work sector in Singapore, the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) and anti-human trafficking organisation Liberty Shared talked about a particularly distressing case of abuse of a migrant domestic worker (MDW) and the reluctance of authorities to intervene unless obvious physical abuse is involved.

The worker in question, known only as Rosa, reportedly works about 19 hours each day at her employers house, from 4am to 11pm. Rosa wasn’t allowed any rest, not even to sit down, during the day except to have her meals. Rosa was afforded no rest days and subjected to seven months of salary deductions to repay her recruitment fees.

On top of that, Rosa’s employer confiscated her mobile phone, which meant she had no way to keep in touch with her family. Her passport was also held by her employer and she was also constantly scolded by members of the family who found fault in everything she did.

When Rosa asked her employer for a transfer, she was refused. The employer told her she had paid a lot of money to hire Rosa and threatened to report her to the police if she dared to leave. After that, Rosa’s employer kept the house key on and refused to let Rosa leave the house. The front door grille was always locked, leaving Rosa feeling increasingly stressed with the confinement.

In a desperate attempt to escape an awful situation, Rose climbed out the bedroom window to get out. She fell. The fall from a height of several stories left her badly injured with both legs fractured. Her doctor said it would take at least a year for Rosa to full recover.

Unfortunately, the police investigated Rosa for ‘attempted suicide’ which is a crime in Singapore, even though she insisted that she was simply trying to escape, not kill herself. The police eventually let her off with a ‘stern warning’ for ‘causing alarm or distress’ to her employer. The report adds that Rosa is disinterested in pursuing any course of remedy that could result in further complications and potentially delay her return.

Rosa’s case is not an isolated incident. The report doesn’t specify when the incident with Rosa took place, but back in 2017, there was a similar case of an MDW who was gravely injured while trying to escape terrible work situation.

Indonesian MDW Nina was abused by the agent who brought her to Singapore. After experiencing severe culture shock from her sleepy village to the modern metropolis of Singapore, Nina request a transfer after just two weeks. Unhappy with that request, Nina’s agent made her stand facing a wall as punishment.

The agent also made her do household chores in her home where Nina was staying while the agent looked for a new placement. She was also subject to verbal abuse. She told HOME that she was treated like a dog and told that she was ‘fit to be a sex worker’. All that greatly contributed to her sense of isolation and distress.

One day, after enduring humiliating verbal abuse and mental distress at the agents home, who culdn’t leave via the front door, went up to the third storey of the house instead. Desperate, Nina went up to the window to look for help and find a way to escape. Nina told HOME that she doesn’t remember much after. Nina’s fall left her with both arms broken, as well as a broken wrist and leg. He had to have metal hips inserted into her right hip.

MOM began investigations into Nina’s case but were unable to identify the agent, who was operating under a false business name. It appeared to be a dead end. And without an identifiable recruiter to investigate, Nina’s employer was free to saddle her with the medical bills and repatriate her.

But HOME didn’t give up. They eventually came across another worker who has been brought to Singapore via the same unlicensed agent. The additional testimony provided clarity and gave investigators more to go on.

Eventually, the agent was identified and charged in court for running an employment agency without license. She wasn’t, however, held legally accountable for the verbal, mental and emotional abuse she had committed. Because once again, the laws are too vague to protect people like Nina.

Incidents like these highlight just how vulnerable MDWs are, especially when even the authorities do not appear to be on their side at all.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

学者质询吉宝岸外贿赂案进展 维护调查完整性当局不便置评

本地学者沙塔尔(Sattar Bawany)教授,投稿英语媒体《今日报》,质询政府公开有关新加坡吉宝岸外与海事公司(Singapore’s Keppel Offshore)贿赂丑闻的调查。 2018年,时任律政部兼财政部高级政务部长的英兰妮,曾表示我国总检察署和贪污调查局已着手调查。但碍于贿赂行为发生在2001年、证据和证人也散布海外多国,当局只能“尽可能迅速行动”。 从英兰妮在国会的答复,距今已有三年之久,似乎仍不见有任何更新消息。“遗憾的是,此案玷污了建国总理李光耀等先贤建立的低贪腐的声誉,拉低我们的国际贪污感知指数。” 沙塔尔认为,此案也显示有必要加强打击贪腐的法律,更好地阻止海外贪污行为。 贪污调查局不便置评 不过,根据贪污调查局透过企业关系助理总监Shawn Chew在昨日(27日)发文回应,指出尽管理解学者的关注,不过为了保护调查的完整,当局仍不便发表评论或更新调查进展。 调查本质上是机密的,这么做也是为了避免影响将来可能进行的提控。 贪污调查局也声称,本地的贪腐情况仍受稳定控制,过去五年当局收到的贪腐犯罪行为举报也有减少趋势。当局也重申续坚决打击贪腐且毫不犹豫将犯罪者绳之以法。…

Take responsibility, we are a meritocratic society

Brandon Ngo It used to be the case when we knew how…

“你的一句话,我失去千元” 送餐员叹因电动滑板车禁令断生计

最近公布的电动滑板车禁令,尤其GrabFood送餐员受影响最甚,有者感叹道,“你的一句话,令我一夕之间少了1200元收入,怎么办?”。 陆路交通管理局于周一(11月5日)发出禁止电动滑板车在人行道上行驶,只能在脚车道和公共连接道上行驶的禁令,周二开始宽限期至今年年杪,明年正式开始实施。违规者一旦被定罪,将面对不超过2000元的罚款,以及不超过三个月的监禁。 这直接影响了我国超过7000名,采用电动滑板车送货的送餐员,且大部分都是GrabFood送餐伙伴成员。 一名GrabFood送餐员希瓦(Siva)就在脸书群组 SG Confessions上帖文,分享有关禁令对其生计带来的严重影响。 希瓦指出,他指2018年开始成为送餐员,而身为一名工艺教育学院(ITE)毕业生的他,正业是一名白领上班族,月入2200元,没有花红且只能领三日病假。但是自从当GrabFood送餐员开始,他每个月可以获得3500元的收入。 他表示,3500元的收入,加上妻子的2000元月入,让他们觉得目前是建立家庭的好时机,他们更购买了一间位于蔡厝港,价值25万元的预购组屋(BTO)。 我帮助国家,它却不愿帮我 但是有关的禁令,却令他措手不及,“这意味着我将只能回到原点,月入突然少了1200元。我还需要为我的宝宝买尿片、奶粉,以及看护保姆,现在简直入不敷出了。” 他指出,他已经依着政府的指示行使,包括购买有UL2272认证的滑板车、小心驾驶(甚至保持两年不曾撞过任何人的记录)、注册个人代步工具、持有稳定工作、成家生子,他都一一做了。“但是政府还是下达了禁令,将能够让我获得良好收入的工作夺走了。” “我想成为好公民,通过工作和生子来帮助国家,我想帮助我的国家,但是我的国家现在不想帮助我。”…