A member of the public, Albert Tang, wrote to ST Forum and his letter was published on ST today (“Why are SP Group’s rates higher than retailers’?“, 16 Jan).

Mr Tang wanted to know why SP Group didn’t offer the heavily discounted electricity rates, which many of the electricity retailers are currently offering to the public, in the first place.

“I have a seemingly simple question that has yet to receive a satisfactory answer from the electricity retailers I have asked,” he said.

“Given that electricity retailers are looking to make a profit, have spent a significant amount on marketing costs and are still able to offer consumers electricity rates that are a good 20 to 30 per cent lower than SP Group’s, why doesn’t SP Group just offer consumers these lower rates in the first place?”

Indeed, according to moneysmart.sg, one can get a fixed discount of as much as 25% off the regulated tariff from SP Group for floating rates.

For fixed price plans, it can be even higher at 30% discount.

Mr Tang continued, “Many of the 13 or so retailers participating in the OEM do not generate their own power, instead claiming to buy in bulk from power plants to sell to consumers. As the largest bulk buyer of electricity, SP Group should benefit the most from economies of scale, and be able to pass the savings on to consumers.”

“It is hard to understand the logic behind creating the OEM and getting so many retailers to compete for consumers, when SP Group is in a position to bypass this step to sell electricity directly to consumers at more competitive rates,” he added.

“I doubt I am the only consumer puzzled by this, and hope that EMA can give a satisfactory explanation.”

In any case, with the heavily discounted pricing currently being offered by so many electricity retailers, following Mr Tang’s reasoning, one would wonder if SP Group has been overly charging the public all this while.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New petition on Change.org calls out for the system “to be fair and just to Nicholas too”

The recent ‘Peeping Tom’ scandal at National University of Singapore (NUS) is…

From gang fights to mentor

David is a student of the Singapore Management University (SMU), with a…

罪状增至18项、受害者11人 留英大学生申请开庭前出国

就读英国顶尖大学的22岁我国男子,日前被指涉及偷拍女生沐浴和如厕事件。但是在上周五面控时增加了18项控状,而受害者人数也从原本的两人增加到11人,包括两名和他上同一所大学的留学生。 被告曾于去年10月面控,指偷拍两名相识的本地女生沐浴和如厕,但是随后获得法院批准提早启程到英国,办理入学手续和居住事宜。 他当时所面对的两项侮辱女性尊严的控状,是针对他于2015年12月2日凌晨1时30分,假乌节酒店客房的厕所内安装录像机,偷拍一名女子的洗澡过程,还有就是于2016年12月23日晚上8时30分,在东部一公寓单位厕所内安装录像机,偷拍另一名女子如厕。 而上周五新增的18项控状,分别为17项侮辱女性尊严罪名,及一项触犯影片法令罪名。 根据法庭文件指出,他被指于2018年以来一共偷拍了九名女子,多达20段受害者沐浴、如厕和更衣的视频。其中有16段视频是在被告独居的公寓内拍下,且有一名受害者在案发时还未成年。 法官谕令,基于部分受害者是被告的亲友,为了保护他们,媒体不能公开受害者和被告,以及他们就读大学的名字。 面对有关的控状,被告表示都不认罪。 控方反对让被告出国避免逃跑 基于审案日期还未定,被告表示想要在下周返回英国上课,因此向法庭申请出国,却遭到控方反对。两方因此于昨日临时返回国家法院,准备进行陈词后,交由法院决定。 控方指出,警方调查已经结束,控方随时准备进入审讯阶段,并要求被告为自己的罪行负责,不应该次次都让他以学业为由而出国,否则案件将会一拖再拖。 被告代表律师却不认同有关指控,并表示控方没有理由做出反对,一则是审讯日期未定案,而且被告有遵守诺言,在去年出国后于上个月返回我国,没有逃避责任的嫌疑。 律师也表示,被告将会在今年3月回国,不会影响审讯进行。他认为控方不应该将被告的学业和审讯混为一谈,只需在意被告是否有如期回国即可。…

Rationalising the warning signs

Joseph Teo / On April 12, Mr. Lim Boon Heng was asked…