A member of the public, Albert Tang, wrote to ST Forum and his letter was published on ST today (“Why are SP Group’s rates higher than retailers’?“, 16 Jan).

Mr Tang wanted to know why SP Group didn’t offer the heavily discounted electricity rates, which many of the electricity retailers are currently offering to the public, in the first place.

“I have a seemingly simple question that has yet to receive a satisfactory answer from the electricity retailers I have asked,” he said.

“Given that electricity retailers are looking to make a profit, have spent a significant amount on marketing costs and are still able to offer consumers electricity rates that are a good 20 to 30 per cent lower than SP Group’s, why doesn’t SP Group just offer consumers these lower rates in the first place?”

Indeed, according to moneysmart.sg, one can get a fixed discount of as much as 25% off the regulated tariff from SP Group for floating rates.

For fixed price plans, it can be even higher at 30% discount.

Mr Tang continued, “Many of the 13 or so retailers participating in the OEM do not generate their own power, instead claiming to buy in bulk from power plants to sell to consumers. As the largest bulk buyer of electricity, SP Group should benefit the most from economies of scale, and be able to pass the savings on to consumers.”

“It is hard to understand the logic behind creating the OEM and getting so many retailers to compete for consumers, when SP Group is in a position to bypass this step to sell electricity directly to consumers at more competitive rates,” he added.

“I doubt I am the only consumer puzzled by this, and hope that EMA can give a satisfactory explanation.”

In any case, with the heavily discounted pricing currently being offered by so many electricity retailers, following Mr Tang’s reasoning, one would wonder if SP Group has been overly charging the public all this while.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】本地累计确诊病例81起 新增四起都与此前病例有关

根据卫生部文告,本地截至18日中午12时,再增加四起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,本地累计确诊病例81起,不过迄今已有29名患者出院,四人病危。 上述新增病患其中三人:第78、80和81起病例,与神召会恩典堂有关,迄今该感染群已累计21人受感染。 第78起病例是57岁女公民,曾在福利组织运营的社区医院工作,不过她负责行政事务,自出现症状后就未接触病患。 她在9日出现不适,并分别于10日和17日看诊,17日被送往国家传染病中心,同日确诊。 第80例则是38岁女公民,在国大医院做行政工作。文告指她与第66例(28岁男公民,在神召会恩典堂工作)有关联。其余和第66例有关联的,还包括第68(79岁女公民)和第70例(27岁女公民)(家属),以及曾与他接触的第71位病患。 第81起病例则是50岁男公民,同样与神召会恩典堂有关,在今日确诊。 至于第79为病例则是35岁的马来西亚女子,近期未到过中国是工作准证持有者,住在兀兰弯。 在接到隔离指示前,她在海军部FoodXchange工作,不过没处理食品。他是此前确诊的第72例家属。她是在12日感到不适,并因为曾与第72例近接触,从15日开始在家隔离。在17日送往国家传染病中心并确诊。 第72病患是40岁中国籍的工作准证持有者,但近期未曾回中国。他和第59例(61岁私人医院麻醉医生)有关联,但不是后者的病人。 一岁男童出院 另一方面,在周日(16日)确诊的一岁男童(第76例),和其他四位病患都在今日治愈出院。他是在本月9日从武汉撤返我国的乘客之一。

综合慢性病患者 可享较高保健储蓄使用顶限

卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉宣布,2021年起患有多种慢性疾病患者,在保健储蓄700(MediSave700)计划下,能动用更多保健储蓄金额支付医药费。 此前我国政府在2018年,把保健储蓄顶限从400提升至500元。 在保健700下,符合资格患者可享有高达700元保健储蓄的使用顶限,包括现有进行的治疗、防疫和检测都可使用。 若一年内,病患需为两种慢性疾病就医,或患有一种慢性疾病,但还有其他并发症,都符合资格。 唐振辉今日是在国会拨款委员会辩论卫生部开支预算时这么表示,他预计有17万6000名患者将从中受惠。 此外,卫生部兼内政部政务次长安宁阿敏,也指出国人到综合诊所,以及社保援助计划(CHAS)下的家庭诊所,注射特定疫苗都能获得津贴。 此举是为了扩大成人免疫计划和全国儿童免疫计划。 对于18岁以下新加坡公民,全国儿童免疫计划(NCIS)下的疫苗和检测,在上述诊所接受服务都能获得全津贴。 至于成人方面,中低收入者到上述诊所,接受成人免疫计划下七种疫苗注射,则可获得75巴仙津贴;其他阶层成人则获一般津贴。 建国一代和立国一代能分别享有额外25至50巴仙津贴。这七种疫苗可为人体预防11种疾病。 卫生部将为这些私人诊所疫苗制定收费顶限,确保不会有诊所牟利。 国人也能动用保健储蓄户头,支付疫苗。

Census 2020: Singapore records slowest population growth since independence; increase in single individuals

Between the year 2010 and 2020, Singapore’s total population recorded its lowest…

Migrant workers will be vaccinated by end of 2021; safety and benefits of vaccine will be communicated to them in their native languages

Singapore’s Second Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng said that COVID-19 vaccine…