Following the Singapore High Court’s ruling to allow a gay Singaporean man to adopt his 5-year old biological son who was conceived via in-vitro fertilisation and carried to term by a surrogate in the US, the Ministry for Social and Family Development (MSF) says it will be reviewing adoption laws and practices.

The High Court ruled that while Singapore’s legislative stance on non-heterosexual parental units is clear, there was a ‘statutory imperative to promote the welfare of the child’ and ‘to regard his welfare as first and paramount’. Therefore, the man was allowed to adopt his biological son.

The Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee said in Parliament on Monday (14 Jan) that there needs to be an ‘appropriate balance’ when weighing the welfare of a child against ‘important public policy considerations’ during adoption proceedings.

He added, “Following the Court’s judgment, MSF is reviewing our adoption laws and practices to see how they should be strengthened to better reflect public policy, which in turn is a reflection of the values of our broad society today.”

“For instance, while the welfare of the child should always be a very important consideration in adoption proceedings, we are looking at whether the Adoption of Children Act needs to be amended so that an appropriate balance can be struck when important public policy considerations are involved,” he said.

I don’t know about you, but to me that sounds like Mr Lee is saying that they’re going to make sure to close any loopholes in the legal system to ensure that no same-sex couples can form a family unit in Singapore in the future. Or they’re trying to make it harder to do so than it already it.

The landmark court ruling on Dec 17 last year allowed the 46-year old pathologist the right to adopt his son who was born via surrogate in the US. The man has been dating his same-sex partner since 1998, also a Singaporean.

The couple had initially wanted to adopt but were advised by agencies that their sexual orientation would be a challenge. So they then travelled to the US and reportedly paid about US$200,000 for a woman to carry and deliver a baby conceived through in-vitro fertilisation using a donated embryo. The baby was handed over to them and they have been living together in Singapore as a family since.

In December 2017, the Family Justice Court had ruled against the adoption. The man then appealed to the High Court where his application to adopt was granted.

While the government doesn’t interfere with the private lives of its citizens, Mr Lee emphasised that MSF does not support “the formation of family units with children and homosexual parents, through institutions and processes such as adoption”.

He reiterated previous comments that LGBT persons have a place in Singapore and are entitled to their own private lives. He added that they also have access to opportunities and social support and are not subject to prejudice and discrimination.

He continued, “however, we must be mindful that a push for rights and entitlements which broader society is not ready for, or able to accept, will provoke a pushback, and can be very socially divisive. A push to use legislation or the courts to precipitate social change involving issues as deeply-held and personal as this, polarises society.”

He went on to say that an adoption order serves to make a child legitimate under the law but does not ‘guarantee’ benefits and privileges such as citizenship, education or housing.

“Access to housing will continue to be determined by prevailing criteria, in line with public policy supporting parenthood within marriage,” he said. “All Singaporean children, regardless of their legitimacy status, will receive Government benefits that support their growth and development, including healthcare and education benefits,” said Mr Lee.

So LGBT persons are ‘welcome’ in Singapore and are ‘free of discrimination’ but not really, especially if they want to start a family?

On the issue of surrogacy, Mr Lee was asked a question by Member of Parliament Christopher de Souza on whether the MSF will ban commercial surrogacy in Singapore.

Mr Lee responded by saying that this ‘complex issue’ has ‘ethical, social, health and legal implications for all parties involved’. He noted that concerns have been raised on commercial surrogacy in particular, specifically about the exploitation of women and commodification of children. He added, “These issues are not trivial, and warrant careful study and discussion.”

Currently, surrogacy cannot be carried out in Singapore at any licensed healthcare institution that provides assisted reproduction services and parents who have gone overseas for surrogacy and return to apply for adoption of their surrogate children will have their applications assessed on a “case-by-case basis”, added Mr Lee.

So while MSF wants to appear to be inclusive of all Singaporeans, it seems they are still nowhere close to being okay with non-heterosexual couples raising a family in Singapore and are still ‘guarding’ the sanctity of the ‘traditional’ family with all their might.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Is GE 2011 about PAP leadership renewal?

Andrew Loh “Out of this election, we must produce Singapore’s fourth Prime…

王瑞杰称选举何时举行受疫情影响 余振忠质问选区范围委会报告迟迟未出炉

昨日(11日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰出席圆桌论坛和电台访谈,其中针对何时会举行大选,他并未正面回答,仅表示近期疫情全球蔓延,相信会持续一段时间,加之当前经济环境,很难预测接下来的进展。 他表示总理和他目前将精力专注在稳定经济、为国人提供援助;同时指国家领导人接下来数月面对的挑战将更艰巨。 “我们必须为最坏状况做好准备,我也希望我们有条件做到这点,这将大大决定我们什么时候宣布举行大选。”至于若疫情持续会否采取不同的选举措施以保障群众健康,王瑞杰称政府也会探讨各种可能性。 不过他强调政府需尊重宪法,确保选举制度受到遵循。但若需要采取一些措施来达到同样目的,当局将探讨能让民众表达政见、投票的合适方案。 对此工人党前非选区议员余振忠认同,固然在疫情肆虐当下,不适合举行选举,然而,不管选举在何时召开,都不至于妨碍到选区范围检讨委员会发表报告吧? 我国来届选举最迟必须在明年4月前举行。选区范围检讨委员会的成立,旨在于选举前划分选区,也是迈入大选前进行的例行工作。 尽管委会检讨工作没有设下时限,不过回溯2006年和2011年,选区范围检讨委会用了四个月时间提交报告。 但在2015年,该委会在5月成立;从7月24日公布新的选区地图,到9月1日的提名日,间隔只有39天。 然而,此次委会早在去年8月1日就成立,然而时隔近7个月,都还未有委会发布选区划分报告的消息。 对此,余振忠质问,这比起2015年,委会足足用了将近四倍的时间,“同样的委会班底,没可能一时之间变得如此没有效率?” 总理秘书陈基荣担任选区范围检讨委会主席。选举局局长许松岭担任委员会秘书,其他委员包括:建屋发展局局长蔡君炫博士、新加坡土地管理局局长陈文凯和统计局局长王辉锦。 余振忠认为,若要证明选举局和选区范围检讨委会是中立的,现在就是最好的时机。…

Jack Sim: COVID-19 offers the opportunity for locals to get hired in the construction industry

Since the explosion of COVID-19 cases in migrant workers’ dormitories, their existence…

Public Forum on Minimum Wage – for Low Wage Workers on 9 June (Sat)

Press Release Public Forum on Minimum Wage – for the low wage…