Roy NgerngYouTube)

Taiwanese-based Singaporean activist and blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling wrote on his Facebook page yesterday (10 January) that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong singled out blogger Leong Sze Hian to sue him for civil defamation, for merely sharing an article on Facebook, and he should be penalised for this action.

Ngerng pointed out that there were almost 10,000 individuals who shared the article but only Leong was picked and sued. To top it up, Leong didn’t even write a caption to accompany his post when he shared the article on Facebook.

Leong is being sued by PM Lee for sharing what his lawyers referred as a “highly defamatory” article by Malaysian website The Coverage. The website accused PM Lee for helping former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak launder funds in the 1MDB scandal.

As such, Ngerng feels that this is clearly a targeted attack on a singular individual.

“If law should be applied fairly, the Prime Minister should have sued all the nearly 10,000 people who shared the article. However, only Leong was sued, as such Leong has been unfairly targeted,” he noted.

He added, “Leong did not write any caption where he shared the article, and the Prime Minister sued him based on the contents inside the article. If so, the Prime Minister should have sued the two originators of the article. Based on public knowledge, the Prime Minister did not, which clearly shows the Prime Minister has acted unfairly.”

By attacking a sole individual for just sharing an article, Ngerng opines that PM Lee should lose this case as the law should be fairly applied to all citizens of Singapore. He continued and said that the PM Lee “should be penalised for singling out an individual to be targeted”.

Besides Leong, PM Lee also sued Ngerng in 2014 for defamation after the latter defamed the Prime Minister in a post alleging misappropriation of money paid by Singaporeans to the Central Provident Fund (CPF).

In December 2015, the blogger was found guilty for the blogpost and the Supreme Court had ordered him to pay S$150, 000 in damages. Ngerng has since been making regular payments to PM Lee for the damages awarded by the court.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MND releases Town Council Management Report for 2016

The Ministry of National Development (MND) has presented the audited financial statements…

为国家寻找最佳方案    马国元首逐个召见国会议员

马来西亚政坛大动荡,敦马哈迪受委任为过渡首相,那么新政府该由谁组织,国家元首预料将会在今明两日,一一会见所有国会议员后决定。 国家皇宫王室事务协调官阿末法迪三苏丁今日在皇宫召开记者会时指出,今明两天,国家元首将会亲自召见所有国会议员,让他们逐个觐见,以确保国会议员的政治立场。 他指出,国会议员们将分批入宫觐见,今天已有90名国会议员觐见国家元首了,而其余的则将在明天觐见。 “陛下是依据国会议员的个人身份召见,并和每名国会议员会谈两、三分钟,以便确定他们的立场。” 在召见结束后,他表示,国家元首将会根据宪法做出决定,即决定在国会中拥有多数支持的一方。 打包麦当劳慰问媒体 国家元首今天亲自驾车到国家皇宫外,会见在外守候多日的媒体记者,并亲自派送打包好的麦当劳,让媒体们享用午餐。 陛下坦言,了解媒体的工作,大家都非常关心目前的局势,“是的,我都知道,但请耐心等候” 。 “让我先召开会议,我希望我们能为国家找到最好的解决方法。”

反诉总理申请被驳回 梁实轩被索讨支付2.1万诉讼费

代表总理李显龙,提告时评人梁实轩的文达星律师楼,致函要求梁必须在本月21日下午5点前,为两张法庭诉讼传票支付总额2万1000新元的费用。 有关信函誌期3月14日,告知梁实轩的代表律师林鼎,高庭法官已在3月12日,批准了SUM148(驳回梁实轩反诉总理)的诉讼申请。与此同时,驳回SUM428(反诉总理滥用司法程序)的申请。 信中指法官要求梁实轩为SUM148传票支付6000元,另一传票则需支付1万5000元。 梁实轩是在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 不过,法官Aedit Abdullah在上周裁决,驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩于去年11月遭总理提告诽谤,指出梁分享的贴文内容毫无根据,诋毁总理人格和声誉。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 然而,梁实轩当时纯粹分享贴文,也未留下任何个人评述和留言。他已遵循资媒局指示撤下了贴文,但还是被总理以法律诉讼对付。

“比中国大陆离谱” 黄之锋谴责新加坡政府提控范国瀚

因为与香港学运领袖黄之锋进行闭门视讯会议交流,新加坡政府将起诉社运份子范国瀚。黄之锋在脸书声援,直批我国政府审查之举,“比中国大陆更离谱”。 范国瀚在2016年11月26日,在新民巷主办“公民抗命即社会运动”论坛,邀请黄之锋透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。 然而,范国瀚也因此被控违反《公共秩序法》,该法要求有外国演讲者的活动,必须事先申请和得到警方许可。针对范国瀚的指控,也在昨日(10月1日)于法庭开审。 黄之锋在脸书贴文表示,范国瀚前年举行闭门论坛,邀请他透过Skype从香港远距离演讲,就因此被提控,直呼新加坡政府做法“比中国大陆离谱”,旨在难以想象当地活动主办者,藉视像会议办论坛也要经过警察审批。 “新加坡作为国际大都会,大量商业会议都用Skype处理,难道所有会议论坛,均要事先向警方申请吗?” 他表示,曾遭马国和泰国拒绝入境,这次连新加坡社运人士也因为与他视讯交流而遭殃,“看来这也反应中国在亚太地区发挥影响力,促使各国封杀在香港争取民主党代表人物。” 在2015年5月,黄之锋受邀赴马国演讲,却被拒入境;在2016年10月,黄之锋曾应邀出席1976年泰国曼谷学运40周年纪念活动,入境泰国时被遣返。 香港众志与社区行动网络联合谴责 黄之锋也是香港众志党(Demosisto)秘书长。香港众志与新加坡非政府组织社区行动网络(CAN)发表联合声明,声援范国瀚。 文告指出,在私人空间进行闭门视讯交流,用逻辑来想也知属私人事务,质疑警方是否有提控之必要。 “集会自由乃基本人权。但是在新加坡,公民为同一共识聚集却往往遭到政府的猜疑。集会只能在唯一地点进行,即便一人也能构成“非法集会”罪行。” 文告谴责,设下诸多恶法,让当权者要提控如范国瀚等社运份子显得绰绰有余,实际上,任何人都可以是被政府对方的的目标。…