Dr Lee Weiling shared today (9 January) on her Facebook page that the Attorney General Chamber is repeating the allegations made by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong about LKY’s Will through his personal lawyer, Lucien Wong, who is the current Attorney General, against Lee Suet Fern in the recent suit.

As indicated in PM Lee’s statutory declaration, he had questions on Ms Lee’s noticeable conflict of interest in her involvement in the Last Will as her husband, Lee Hsein Yang, was a beneficiary and will gain from the removal of Dr Lee’s additional share.

In Dr Lee’s post, she said that she had debunked the allegations in 2017 and shared that Ms Lee Suet Fern was the one who helped her to convince LKY to reinstate her rights and gave her an additional 1/7 share in the Will.

She went on further to say that it was PM Lee and Ho Ching who was denying her rights in LKY Final Will.

It was revealed earlier by Dr Lee that the AGC made a complaint of 500 pages to Law Society about Ms Lee for a possible professional misconduct over the handling of LKY’s Final Will.

“Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s share increased under the Last Will. AGC also noted that Mr Lee Hsien Yang had said publicly that the Last Will was drafted by Ms Kwa Kim Lee of M/s Lee & Lee. However Ms Kwa Kim Lee has denied that she drafted it,” AGC said in a statement on Monday (7 January).

According to AGC, Attorney-General Lucien Wong has recused himself from the case as Mr Wong used to be PM Lee’s lawyer who handled the Oxley Road matter. Deputy Attorney-General Lionel Yee is said to be now overseeing it.

However, it would seem based on AGC’s statement on Ms Lee Suet Fern that it is using allegations put forth by PM Lee and Lucien Wong that is not proven in court which raise questions as just how recused is Mr Wong in this matter.

Back in 2017, the two siblings, LHY and LWL had accused their brother of abusing his position on their dispute over the demolition of the old property at 38 Oxley Road which led to the Prime Minister to convene a debate in Parliament where he self-declared himself as being innocent of all the allegations put forth against him.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Minimum Wage Debate : 5 hrs Confession of PAP’s economic sins…

Below is an excerpt from an article taken from blog Diary of…

Politicians from all sides wish Low Thia Khiang well after he was taken to ICU

On Sunday (3 May), the Workers’ Party (WP) announced on its Facebook…

PIE高架桥惨剧引以为戒! 林瑞莲质询当局吁保障公共安全

有鉴于2017年曾发生泛岛快速公路(PIE)施工高架桥倒塌的惨剧,工人党主席暨阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,在国会质询当局对于建筑项目的规划,是否应扮演更多的管制角色,侦测和弥补漏洞,以保障公共安全。 林瑞莲是在本周三(4日)的国家发展部财案预算辩论,询问新加坡建设局(BCA)是否有检查和核实,那些项目工程所聘用的合格人员(QP)认证、资历和文件等符合资格。 他提及,国家发展部早在2018年7月,就已针对建筑项目的标准程序规划细节。例如,在提交项目阶段,建设局将对项目蓝图,以及关键结构等的设计计算,进行抽样调查。 这也是确保负责项目的合格人员和认证审查员(accredited checke),都有审核并确保有关设计,是符合建筑管制需求的。 此外,在施工阶段,建设局也会对结构工程进行针对性的检查。 故此,林瑞莲质询,在PIE工程施工时,当局是否曾进行上述审核调查。“PIE高架桥的结构倒塌,根据法庭发现的事实,是否意味着当中有需要弥补的漏洞?” PIE高架桥惨剧 回溯2017年7月14日约凌晨3时30分,衔接樟宜东路上段和泛岛快速公路(PIE)的高架桥在兴建时,突然部分结构坍塌,造成一名中国籍客工丧命和10人受伤。 负责设计高架桥,结果却导致坍塌事故的工程师今早被判86周监禁与1万元罚款。 印尼籍工程师缺乏桥梁设计经验 该起事故当中的46岁印尼籍专业工程师罗伯特(Robert…

We should not hesitate to drawdown further on national reserves for more COVID-19 support, says NCMP Leong Mun Wai

While the additional S$8 billion the Government is committing for further COVID-19…