Telsa founder & CEO Elon Musk tweeted that the Singapore government has been unwelcome to Tesla Inc. in a response to a tweet asking why his car company isn’t in Singapore.

Musk is of course alluding to his previous assertion that the government doesn’t support electric vehicles. Back in 2016, the Singapore Land Transport Authority (LTA) imposed a $15,000 carbon surcharge on a Tesla Model S that was imported into the country by a businessman. The car, which was first registered in Hong Kong in 2014, was then shipped out to Singapore.

While the Tesla Model S qualifies for tax breaks in most countries as it is an electric vehicle, in Singapore this Tesla was slapped with a hefty carbon surcharge instead. Elon Musk was made aware of the charge via social media. He then reached out to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong about the incident. A spokesperson for the PM in turn said that various agencies were looking into the matter.

In a statement issued by LTA, they noted that the Model S in question showed a power consumption of 444 watt-hour/km. This as well as the COS emission of 0.5g/watt-hour at power plants put the car’s emission at 222g/km. This is how it ended up in the $15,000 surcharge band of the Carbon Emissions-based Vehicle Scheme instead of a tax break.

According to Telsa Motors, the Model S’s actual energy consumption was rated at a lower 181 watt-hour/km when it left the factory in 2014. However, LTA contended that since the car was not new, there’s no way to know how much the condition might have deteriorated, resulting it is being low enough on the carbon emission scale to qualify for a surcharge.

LTA also emphasised that while the Model S doesn’t use petrol, it still requires charging via electricity and in Singapore, electricity is still generated using fossil fuels – so the car isn’t really carbon free. That is why the carbon surcharge is maintained for all vehicles. LTA ended by saying that they will work with Tesla engineers to look further into the case.

This is could be one example of what Musk meant when he said the Singapore government has been unwelcome. When prompted by another user about Singapore’s reliance on fossil fuels and their stance against electric vehicles, Mr Musk said that Singapore is actually capable of being energy-independent.

Now, Singapore is a small country so they do take measures to limit the number of cars on the road. They’ve poured a lot of time and money into improving the public transportation system and encouraging people to use public transport over private vehicles.

The governments Vehicular Emissions Scheme (VES) assess vehicles based on pollutants, imposing a surcharge based on the type and amount of emissions the vehicle produces. On top of that, there’s the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) which represents the right to vehicle ownership and use of the limited road space for 10 years. For this, car owners will have go through a competitive bidding process that occurs twice a month. Basically, the government controls the number of new vehicles allowed for registration per month.

However, the COE doesn’t distinguish a petrol car from an electric car, charging the same for both. So while the VES looks at the type of pollution, Singapore’s COE system doesn’t bother whether a new car is electric or petrol.

This is one of the reasons why the uptake on electric vehicles is still so slow in Singapore, says Dr Sanjay Kuttan of the Energy Research Institute. When speaking to Today Online in June 2018 about the obstacles that are keeping electric car sales down, Dr Kuttan questioned the government’s commitment to encouraging the shift from petrol-run cars to the more eco-friendly electric cars. A lack of charging stations is only part of the problem. He said, “With the Government spending millions to encourage public transportation, how can you have policies that support private car uptake?”

That’s a valid point, and one that Elon Musk clearly agrees with.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

卫生科学局起获8万元非法咳嗽药水 7名嫌犯被逮

卫生科学局与多个执法机构合作,起获市值共8万元的非法咳嗽药水和各种药物,同时将7名嫌疑人逮捕归案。 卫生科学局今日(5日)发表声明,在连同勿洛和中央警署、中央肃毒局和卫生部合作下,于三个地点展开突击,共计起获了逾12万5千毫升的可待因止咳药水,以及6万3千颗止咳药、安眠药等药物。 警方于黄金坊的一个办公室内进行埋伏,该地疑似是非法制造和储存咳嗽药水之地。 当时两名嫌犯被发现进入办公室,一名男子正推着装有咳嗽药水及各类药品的推车离开办公室,随即被警方逮捕,并起获其非法药品。该药品原本要卖给芽笼一带的非法小贩。 同天,警方也在芽笼12巷的一家咖啡店及诊所进行突击检查,7名年龄介于26岁至69岁的嫌犯落网,其中一人涉嫌走私受管制药物二氢可待因,正接受肃毒局调查。 此外,当时还有一名医生因涉嫌非法供应药物,正在协助调查。 卫生科学局表示,针对危害公众健康的非法活动将会严正以待,对于从事非法保健品进口、制造和供应,一并采取严格的执法行动。 一旦罪成,将可能判处最高两年监禁,或罚款最高5万元。

Lawrence Wong tells students at NTU forum that Govt and people are on the same side

At a forum organised by the Nanyang Technological University’s (NTU) student union…

开公积金投资户头 需填问卷测试

中央公积金局于本月24日发文告,从今年10月1日起,欲参与公积金投资计划的会员,需先完成一份问卷测试,以清楚自身对投资理财的认知程度,从而判断自己是否适合开设有关投资户头。 这项更动,旨在确保拥有时间和投资知识者,已准备好承担投资风险。如果不谙投资或没有时间的公积金会员,可选择把钱继续放在公积金户头,赚取无风险的利率。 不过,不论问卷评估结果如何,会员都能开设投资户头。虽然公积金鼓励会员们接受测试,但并未强制现有会员参与。 “这项更动早在2018年3月份,由人力资源部附加辩论委员会在国会提出。” 下调投资户头销售费和合并收费 同时,参与投资计划的销售费和合并收费(wrap fees),也将从下月1日起下调: 当前 从2018念10月1日起 销售费 (新开设的公积金投资户头) 3%…

感谢民众支持,本社英语站恢复运作

上周二,警方依据庭令前往本社总编许渊臣住处搜查,并没收了其电脑工作设备,以供调查针对一篇文章的诽谤指控。没有了工作设备,也导致《网络公民》英语站被迫暂停更新。 警方是根据投报,指其中一篇由Willy Sum撰写的文章,严重政府高层涉及贪腐,而援引刑事法典第21条(1)的刑事诽谤罪展开调查。 《网络公民》将交由警方调查有关指控。在读者和热心民众的支持下,已成功添购新器材,本社英语站也将在今日恢复运作。 也有热心人士为透过募资网站Patreon,或成为本社订户给予无私支持。我们将继续报导工作,来回报支持者们的善意。 不论是透过金钱、提供信息、稿件等各类支持,我们谨在此对各界致以由衷感谢。 为应付可能在明年召开的大选,我们正展开募款活动,以壮大我们的团队。许渊臣担忧自身可能有再次被逮捕或被对付的风险,为此他需确保即便他身陷囹圄,选举期间的编采报导仍能照常进行。 有您的支持,本社将竭尽所能继续报导,直至所有可用资源耗尽被迫终止运营位置。 正如我们坚信的信念:“透过接触更广泛的新闻资源与观点、活跃而成熟的论述交会,碰撞思潮激荡的火花,才能打造具备知情权和参与式的民主环境。”