On 2 January, The Straits Times (ST) published a complaint letter by Chua Chun Wei who stated his dissatisfaction over SingPost’s service standards.

Personally, he encountered many “unhappy episodes” with SingPost’s service delivery standards, where there were multiple times where he was at home the whole day, only to find a delivery-failure notice at his door saying that the postman was not able to deliver his package.

He has also experienced tremendous amount of frustration in trying to redirect his package to another pick-up location, which tells that there’s possible problems with SingPost’s mail-tracking system. As a result of this, he had to pick up his package from an inconvenient location.

In addition to that, there were also times where he had his neighbours’ letters placed wrongly in his letterbox.

Although he is happy with SingPost’s corporate social responsibility efforts, but he opines that the company should uphold its core services first to ensure that it’s meeting the basic standards expected of it as a public service provider.

Besides Mr Chua, many netizens also experienced their share of problems with SingPost and have mentioned it on Facebook.

Although there are myriad of issues with SingPost’s delivery services, some netizens have offered their solutions to curb this problem. As such, Facebook user HuiChing Hia opines that the company has to reorganise their system by installing parcel collection lockers at convenient location, enlisting convenience stores to act as collection points and arrange fixed delivery times like FairPrice.

Vono Seekeh feels that the company should regularly do a quality service survey to evaluate its performance.

Wan Hui Wong thinks that “SingPost door-door delivery system should take a leaf from the relatively new services like NinjaVan” as they give options for customers to provide information if they’re not at home.

He also feels that if door-door services are too difficult for SingPost to handle, they should “consider giving up these to other market players instead of drawing frustrations from unhappy customers”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公用事业局:按原计划周六接管大泉海水淡化厂

据了解,尽管有阿拉伯联合酋长国事业集团Utico等提出报价,有意投资凯发集团(Hyflux),然而公用事业局仍会按照原定计划,在本周六(18日)接管大泉海水淡化厂。 公用事业局是在上月17日发文告,表示为了保障新加坡水资源,正式向凯发集团旗下的大泉水电厂,发出终止购水协议(WPA)的通知,并将接管大泉海水淡化厂。 凯发集团原本有印尼财团SM投资注资5亿3000万元助凯发重组,但后来凯发突然宣布终止重组协议。 当时凯发向投资者保证,会继续寻求可行的策略,在法庭监督下完成重组过程。 但是公用事业局在受《亚洲新闻台》询问,表示仍会照原计划接管大泉水厂。 在本月初,凯发表示包括基金公司Oyster Bay Fund和阿联酋Utico,都有意投资凯发。 其中阿联酋Utico有意注资四亿新元,也将为凯发注入营运资本和其他急需应用的资金。 阿联酋总裁告诉路透社,针对投资凯发事宜将与公用事业局洽谈。 “我们上周提交了有约束力的条款清单,寻求可令所有利益相关者满意的交易。” 上周,法庭已驳回银行债权人,将凯发交由司法管理的申请。同时,延长凯发债务延期偿付令(moratorium)期限,延长至本月29日。…

Xenophobia and hypocrisy

~ By Gordon Lee ~ Lee Kuan Yew and the PAP he…

Action for AIDS President points that 377A is homophobic, dissuades at-risk individuals from seeking HIV treatment and screening

Recently, the non-profit organisation Action for AIDS came out in support of…

Free COVID-19 vaccines for short-term pass holders on extended stay in Singapore: MOH

Short-term pass holders who have been in the country for an extended…