On 2 January, The Straits Times (ST) published a complaint letter by Chua Chun Wei who stated his dissatisfaction over SingPost’s service standards.

Personally, he encountered many “unhappy episodes” with SingPost’s service delivery standards, where there were multiple times where he was at home the whole day, only to find a delivery-failure notice at his door saying that the postman was not able to deliver his package.

He has also experienced tremendous amount of frustration in trying to redirect his package to another pick-up location, which tells that there’s possible problems with SingPost’s mail-tracking system. As a result of this, he had to pick up his package from an inconvenient location.

In addition to that, there were also times where he had his neighbours’ letters placed wrongly in his letterbox.

Although he is happy with SingPost’s corporate social responsibility efforts, but he opines that the company should uphold its core services first to ensure that it’s meeting the basic standards expected of it as a public service provider.

Besides Mr Chua, many netizens also experienced their share of problems with SingPost and have mentioned it on Facebook.

Although there are myriad of issues with SingPost’s delivery services, some netizens have offered their solutions to curb this problem. As such, Facebook user HuiChing Hia opines that the company has to reorganise their system by installing parcel collection lockers at convenient location, enlisting convenience stores to act as collection points and arrange fixed delivery times like FairPrice.

Vono Seekeh feels that the company should regularly do a quality service survey to evaluate its performance.

Wan Hui Wong thinks that “SingPost door-door delivery system should take a leaf from the relatively new services like NinjaVan” as they give options for customers to provide information if they’re not at home.

He also feels that if door-door services are too difficult for SingPost to handle, they should “consider giving up these to other market players instead of drawing frustrations from unhappy customers”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

若锦街发现二战炸弹! 今日引爆附近公寓酒店住户被疏散

根据新加坡警方脸书贴文周六(16日)在脸书发文公告,指若锦街、里峇峇利埔(River Valley Green)和金声路(Kim Seng Road)等部分路段,将从今早9时30分开始封路,究竟所为何事? 根据该贴文,警方解释事缘本月12日下午,警方接获投报指在若锦街一建筑工地发现一枚旧炸弹。 警方不敢怠慢,请武装部队军火拆爆组(EOD)前往鉴定,得知这是二战期间的空投弹,约50公斤重,基于转移不安全,当局决定必须在现场引爆。 文告称拆弹组将在今日8时至6时期间进行引爆工作。而附近200米的酒店和公寓居民也已被疏散,并劝请其他民众切勿靠近上述地点,且不准放无人机进行航拍。 据了解该区附近有国敦河畔大酒店 (Grand Copthorne Waterfront…

分享讽刺视频 网民接资媒局警告信要求撤下

日前,警方和资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发出联合声明,基于网红普丽蒂(Preetipls)的视频被指含侮辱内容,接受警方调查,而呼吁民众不要重新上载或分享有关视频。 本周一,本地Youtube网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preeti Nair,简称Preetipls),相信是不满电子付费平台epay拍摄的广告宣传照欠缺敏感度,也拍摄讽刺视频回应。 但有关视频在当天中午就被令撤下,警方稍后发文告指有人就普丽蒂上载的视频报案,视频被指含有侮辱性内容。 虽然原视频已遭撤下,但不久后仍有不少网民在脸书和youtube等平台重新上载,遭其他网民疯传。对此警方在前日发文呼吁民众停止在网络散播普丽蒂的视频。 事实上确实有网民,只因为分享视频结果接到资媒局的警告信,要求在六小时内把分享链接和贴文删除。其中社运分子范国瀚也中招。 范国瀚在脸书无奈写道:“我收到要求撤下普丽蒂视频的通知,根据资媒局,如果任由视频散播,会造成族群仇视和纠纷。”他也挖苦道,视频只能留在脸书六个小时,所以还没看的宜从速。 至于另一网民也把资媒局的信函分享在个人脸书,但他认为对于国人族群问题不应被扫在地毯下,大家更应该继续帮助少数族群维护权益。 网红“美丽求求你”拍摄的讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。  

Police to return activist's note book after lawyer's demands

The Singapore Police has agreed to return the note book it had…

陈振声吁勿艰难时刻解雇员工 业者哭诉人力部提不同建议

由于近期受到武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情的打击,贸工部长陈振声建议业者和他的基层领导们勿在艰难时刻解雇员工,同时也应遵循政府建议,加以培训员工。 陈振声上周与新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)以及新加坡商业人士举办闭门会议中表示,“趁现在仍然有能力时,能不能先不立即解雇工人,而是接受政府建议训练员工,利用一些机会协助员工待在下来,以为下一阶段做准备。” 他也补充,“如果你立即解雇员工,我们可能会再次陷入困境。” 与会者哭诉不想炒员工 上周,政府指出未来数个月内,将会出现普遍放缓的情况,预期对相关行业和公司产生连锁反应,因此政府准备支持相关行业公司与员工。 其支持措施包括协助公司留住与培训员工,并承担部分工资费用。 而根据疑是在会议现场的录音,现场其中一位与会者提出疑问,她表示,虽然很同意陈振声这一番话,但她也在此前曾拜访过人力部,却也听到不同的建议。 她强调,人力部称,若她无法保留员工,就应该让他们走。“我并不想解雇我的员工,但人力部却要求我解雇他们”,她含泪说着。 陈振声则表示,人们必须随着现况改变其商业模式,使其更具多元化。 “如果你不想改变也不多样化,即使得到我们的相助,我们也无法替你解决下一次的问题。我们可以保证会给予你协助,但同时你也需要提升自己。” 企业必须学会“多元化” 陈振声也进一步阐述,企业必须尽快学会“多元化”,“因为它影响你、我以及所有人。”…