Former National Solidarity Party (NSP) chief and the founder of People’s Voice Lim Tean wrote on his Facebook page today that he finds the Attorney-General’s Chamber’s (AGC) complaint on Lee Suet Fern absurd and feels that this matter itself should be looked into.

He wrote this in response to the issue where AGC lodged a complaint of 500 pages to Law Society about Lee Suet Fern, a lawyer and the wife of Lee Hsien Yang of possible professional misconduct over Lee Kuan Yew’s final Will.

It appears that the AGC became aware of a possible case of professional misconduct by Ms Lee when she prepared the last Will of the former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and arranged for him to execute it, despite the fact that her husband, Lee Hsien Yang, is one of the beneficiaries under the last Will.

“Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s share increased under the Last Will. AGC also noted that Mr Lee Hsien Yang had said publicly that the Last Will was drafted by Ms Kwa Kim Lee of M/s Lee & Lee. However Ms Kwa Kim Lee has denied that she drafted it,” AGC said in a statement on Monday (7 January).

Under the legal profession’s rule of conduct, lawyers are not allowed to place themselves in a position of conflict, AGC expressed.

Ms Lee, previously a managing partner with law firm Morgan Lewis Stamford, has been in the middle of a dispute between the Lee’s siblings – her husband, Dr Lee Wei Ling and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong – over the preparation of their father’s last Will.

According to AGC, Attorney-General Lucien Wong has recused himself from the case and Deputy Attorney-General Lionel Yee is overseeing it. Mr Wong used to be PM Lee’s lawyer who handled the Oxley Road matter. However, the other Deputy Attorney-General is Hri Kumar who is a former PAP MP.

In Lim Tean’s post, he said that this is a private matter and what the AGC is doing now is collateral attack on the validity of the Will as it was proven in probate. He added that if this is allowed to go on, then the court’s decisions will be worthless.

He went on further and questioned, “Why is a State Organ involved in a private matter? I hope the Opposition in Parliament will raise relevant questions on this issue when Parliament sits on January 14.”

Adding to that, Mr Lim also wondered whose initiative was it to lodge this complaint.

“A State Organ is involving itself in a private matter and if I am in Parliament, I will call for a Select Committee to look into this matter. I find it outrageous that public funds are being used by the AGC in furtherance of a private dispute,” he said.

He also rubbished the claim that Attorney-General Lucien Wong has recuses himself as there “was never and will never be sufficient justification for this unprecedented step which was taken”.

Supporting Mr Lim’s concerns, many netizens also feel this is a family dispute that should be handled privately, and not involving public funds.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Young couple scammed over S$277,000 by Carousell seller offering discounted stay at Marina Bay Sands

Given the current restrictions in overseas travel as a result of the…

Collaboration between Visterra, Inc and A*STAR to further development of antibody for dengue fever treatment

  Visterra, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company that uses its proprietary technology…

“Apologies have never absolved individuals of liability”: Lawyer explains why she declines to retract police report against SMRT Feedback by the Vigilanteh

Apologies have never absolved individuals of liability, as demonstrated in previous cases…

“临时”了60年的刑事法(临时条款)

撰文:人权律师M.Ravi  翻译:北雁 刑事法(临时条款)(CLTPA)被“临时”延长了六十年,还算是临时条款吗?该法在1955年颁布,就连名称本身都用词不当,新加坡人又再一次被愚弄了。 我们知道,该法赋权部长,未经审讯,就可下令拘留嫌犯。这原本是殖民时代的产物,是为了对应那个时代危机的临时措施。 然而,即便国家独立后,法令还沿用至今,新加坡可说是全球唯一,把一项“临时措施”保留了超过半世纪的国家。 而最近的刑事法(临时条款)修正法案,则针对部长拘留权限附加以下条款: “针对第(1)分款【拘留令和警察监视】事项,部长的所有决策均为最终决定。” 我已经说过,让部长干预警方执法的角色,很危险。上述条文也把司法机构审查任何拘留案件的权限,排除在外,使得透过司法程序挑战变得极为困难。 简言之,就是压迫基本权利,司法机构也无法、甚至对于审查有关拘捕或警察监视令是否公正,无法起作用。 在我执业期间,曾遇过一些个案、有者年仅19岁,声称自己无辜且被人诬陷。即便辩护他们的证据很无力,但却因为类似上述的法令,他们甚至连在法庭面对审判的机会都没有。 我们既然已经有针对高利贷和私会党活动制定了严法,这种“临时”措施,就不应再扩大并延伸到更广泛的犯罪行为。 刑事法(临时条款)近期的修法,…