by Tan Wah Piow

What does it tell us about the state of world affairs when politicians need to appeal to Facebook and other social media giants, to censor contents which are deemed problematic?

It means that In this digital age, dictators can no longer enjoy the monopoly of the tools of information dissemination, or rely on their controlled media to mould peoples’ thoughts. Hence the frenzy to brand alternative news as ‘fakes’.

This is the new battle front. Although Singapore prides itself as at the frontline of cutting-edge technology, its ruling party, the PAP (People’s Action Party) is still deep in the politics of social control designed for the analogue age.

Hence the biggest show in Singapore town in 2019 will be the libel case of Lee Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, against Leong Sze Hian, a prolific social critic and blogger. Long term observers of Singapore politics will know that libel courts have become the political execution grounds of the island state. For a politician to be bankrupted following a libel suit is the modern day equivalent of having one’s head lobbed off.

Unlike the past when citizens merely sighed in resignation, fearful that critical comments could lead to criminal prosecution under the archaic Scandalising the Court Act, something unprecedented happened on this occasion.

Lee Hsien Yang, the brother of the Prime Minister not merely donated to Leong’s fighting’s fund, he is the first to do so, according to reports on social media.

This makes what was, until now, merely a sibling feud within Singapore’s first family, openly political. Already Lee Hsien Yang’s son, Li Sheng Wu, a Harvard don, is forced to self-exile, following a contempt of court charge, that case has yet to be heard.

It may be too premature to regard Lee Hsien Yang’s intervention as the harbinger of new politics in Singapore, but such open defiance against the established order can only encourage others who are too timid to break ranks to do likewise. Already Singaporeans who have erstwhile sat on the fence are feeling uneasy with the gratuitous persecutions of various social activists in the past 12 months.

Given that the General Elections have to be held latest by 2021 and rumored to be end of this year, Lee Hsien Yang’s move cannot come at a worst time for Lee Hsien Loong. The more politically sophisticated electorate would be expecting a government capable of managing politics in the digital era, which the current elites are not.

Digital technology is a double edge sword. The PAP would no doubt deploy all resources, to further curb the growth of dissent. To combat them, we have to go beyond our keyboards, and the opposition forces also need to think beyond the traditional tribal boundaries to bring about change fit for the digital era.

Our numbers, at least digitally, have never been bigger, yet our rights have shrunk. If we do not win the next round, with the exponential growth of artificial intelligence, the control of the state over us will be beyond imagination.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

窜改成绩单报读大学 24岁男子被罚款5500元

为了能够进到母亲心属的大学就读,Kieffer Tay Kai Xian擅自窜改理工学院的成绩,并两度使用伪造成绩单申请新加坡管理学院(UniSIM)。他甚至使用假成绩单,申请入读于2017年该组为本地第六所自治大学的新加坡跃社科大学(SUSS)。 被告代表律师表示,被告当时承受着来自其母亲的巨大压力,被告母亲曾扬言,若被告无法入读大学,将把他踢出家门。 现年24岁的被告于周四(19日)出席地方法院的审讯时,被判罚款5500元。他目前就读SIM全球教育和伯明翰大学合作课程的学士学位。 面对伪造证件的指控,他表示认罪,目前还有三项控状尚在法官考量中。 法庭指出,他于2016年至2017年期间,使用伪造的理工学院成绩单来申请课程。 他将淡马锡理工学院成绩单上的平均分(CGPA),从1.76改为2.76,以便能够增加入读管理学院金融科的机会。该学院管理员发现成绩单经过窜改,因此拒绝了被告的申请,但是被告还是坚持再次做出申请。 在今年3月,新跃社科大学的一名管理员报警,指被告为了被大学录取,反复提交经过窜改的成绩单。 律师指被告母亲好面子所致 代表律师Jeffrey…

被罚款影响退还押金 陆交局:对oBike失望

共享脚车公司oBike退出新加坡市场,但是声称若被陆交局征收没收脚车的罚款,可能需动用用户押金来支付,新加坡陆路交通局对该公司无法实践承诺感到失望。 早前,oBike创始投资人石一曾表示,将尽力退回押金给用户,希望陆交局能网开一面,暂缓征收没收脚车的罚款,给与该公司更多时间回收脚车。 陆交局称,在6月30日与石一及oBike管理层会面,后者承诺将把四散公共范围的脚车收拾妥当,并尽快退款给客户,也表明回收脚车的费用不会动用客户押金。 在本月3日的文告中,陆交局认为oBike公司应有具体归还客户押金的计划。 针对7月4日回收脚车的限期,陆交局称,如果该公司展现合作诚意,将所有脚车移出公共范围,会考量放宽限期。 石一:公关讯息误会 不过,石一较后澄清,有关被罚款将导致退回押金困难的说法,乃是下属对媒体发布讯息时造成的误会,并不是出自他本人。“如早前所述,oBike会竭尽所能回收完所有脚车。” 他说,已经委托回收商到各地回收脚车,该公司完全配合当局,希望能令陆交局满意。 截至昨日下午5时,新加坡消费者协会共接获1千044宗要求oBIke退款的投诉。自上周oBike退出市场,该协会受理有关投诉,并反映给oBike,后者曾表示用户押金已被用来购买脚车和维持运营成本。 该协会批评,用户付还押金乃是妥善使用服务的保障,擅用押金于其他用途是“缺乏职业道德和无法接受的“。 oBike公司在其文告表示对于近期造成的不便致歉,并表示目前正与陆路交通管理局和消费者协会等多个单位商议,设法退回用户们的押金。“我们和相关单位紧密配合,达成退回押金给用户的方案。退款程序将在细节确定后公布。” oBike创办人石一也表示,只要用户想取回押金,该公司会尽力偿还,最坏打算就是以自己的股份承担。

Progress Singapore Party to concentrate on wards in western Singapore for GE2020

The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) has announced that it will be fielding…

A Possible Indirect Admission of a Strategic Policy Failure

By Chua Suntong – On 25 September 2012, the Ministry of Trade…