Aircrafts at Chubu Centrair International Airport (Photo by Lee Yiu Tung /Shutterstock.com)

Japan has introduced a departure tax for people leaving the country from 7 Jan onward. The country will start collecting the tax of ¥1,000 (S$12.50) per person leaving the country by aircraft of shift regardless of their nationality.

The law, which was enacted in April last year, will see a levy being imposed on travellers on top of their airfare, ship fare, and travel fees.

With the number of visitors to Japan soaring in recent years, reaching 30 million in 2018, it’s estimated that the levy will generate about ¥6 billion (S$74 million) in the fiscal year 2018 to March 2019 and ¥50 billion (S$624 million) in the fiscal year 2019.

This revenue will be used develop the country’s tourism bases and improve immigration procedures. Specifically, the funds will be used to set up facial recognition gates at airports, multilingual information boards, and cashless payment terminals for public transportation.

Only people who are leaving Japan within 24 hours of their arrival and children under 2 years of age will be exempted from this departure tax. Also, flight tickets to Japan purchased and issued before 7th Jan 2019 will also be exempted.

Initial reaction has been one of concern. One argument is that visitors are already spending money in Japan during their time there, so many see this tax as a way for Japan to milk visitors out of more money.

The thing is, departure tax is not a new concept. In fact, many countries already have such a levy in place under different names. In Malaysia, it used to be called the ‘airport tax’ which has been renamed ‘Passenger Service Charge’. In Australia it’s called the Passenger Movement Charge while in the UK it’s called Air Passenger Duty (specifically for those travelling by air).

Netizens in Singapore have pointed out that the Japanese departure tax of approximately S$12.50 is actually quite a small sum. You probably won’t even notice the difference as the charge will be include in your overall ticket price.

In fact, netizens have said that this amount is nothing compared to the levy charged by Singapore on its travellers to fund the new Change Terminal 5.

The Transport Ministry and Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) announced in February that passengers beginning their trips from Changi Airport will now have to pay a levy of S$10.80 per person. On top of that, the Passenger Service and Security Fee was increased by S$2.30 on 1 July 2018 and will do so again every year until 2024 to fund the new terminal.

Unfortunately for Singapore, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) strongly objected against the attempt to charge travellers to help fund the construction of the new Terminal 5. The IATA stressed that it is ‘strongly against any pre-financing of any infrastructure’.

So in Singapore, all these charges combined means that passengers travelling via Changi Airport will have to pay a total of S$47.30 in airport fees until the next increase in April 2019. That is significantly higher than Japan’s new departure tax of only S$12.50.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】一例入境病例从印度返新

我国昨日(25日)新增31例冠状病毒确诊患者,创下五个月以来单日新增新低,没有社区病例,一例入境病例。 据卫生部文告,一例入境病例为25岁女性永久居民,于本月13日从印度返新,入境后开始履行居家通知,并于隔离期间确诊。 昨日并无任何社区病例,也未有任何新增病患曾到访地点,病例总数累计5万6435例。 另外30例新增病例为居住在宿舍的客工,其中有26人与早前确诊病例有过接触,随后接受隔离措施。 另四例则为当局进行轮流例行检测,以及检测出现急性呼吸道症状病患时发现的。根据血清检测结果显示,其中有两例病例的检测结果呈阳性,相信是早前受感染。 日前再度被列入感染群的双溪登加客工宿舍和Homestay Lodge,分别新增三例和一例相关病例,目前共有61例和七例病例。 截至昨日,我国又有230人出院或离开社区隔离设施,其康复人数增加至5万4816人。 仍有78人尚未出院,1514人则在社区设施接受护理或隔离,死亡病例维持在27例。

学者:把经济学101理论生搬硬套到公共讨论,很危险

*本文乃节译自:香港科技大学领导力和公共政策学高级讲师刘浩典教授,以及管理顾问吴俊卫(Benjamin Goh)合著的评论,原文于2019年2月20日刊于《海峡时报》。 刘浩典也是李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长,吴俊卫则曾担任哈佛大学知名经济学家格里高利.曼昆(N. Gregory Mankiw)经济学入门课程EC10的教学助理。   诚如经济学格言提到:相对人们的无限欲望,资源总是有限稀缺的。在有关预算的任何讨论中,我们总被一再提醒必须权衡利弊取舍、还有作为社会支柱的社会契约价值观。比方说,很常我们会听到宏观社会开支,对工作积极度会带来负面影响的论述,又或者说,这在财政上难以维续。 然而就好像我们相信科学家提出的科学理论,人们对这些疑似经济学论点,很容易毫无怀疑地会照单全收。 但我们应抵制这种诱惑。与其反映现实经验,许多经济命题更多地表达发表者自己意识形态或信念。举一些我们常听到的经济观点: 自由贸易会让社会里所有人过得更好 最低薪金制会减少就业 一位专业的经济学家对这样的观点给予的肯定更少。他/她会说,这种命题只有在某些(严格)的假设下才能成立。…

“疫情发哨人”专访遭下架 中国网民挑战审查底线广传文章

本周二(10日),中国国家主席习近平到湖北省武汉首次视察,引起当地轰动,但在同一天,一篇关于武汉医生的采访却引发了网友的关注。 据报道指出,3月10日早上,国家级权威出版机构人民出版社《人物》杂志原本在网上发布一篇文章《发哨子的人》,其接受采访的对象即是武汉中心医院急诊科主任艾芬,诉说她从疫情初到现在的经历与感受。 该篇文章指出,当天正是艾芬向同学转发一份病毒检测报告,才让整个武汉的医生圈得悉事件,包括被警方训诫的李文亮医生。 随后她被指是“造谣的源头”,受到了医院纪委的严厉批评,让她大受打击。 随后这篇文章在发布三小时后却便被删除,尽管中国一直以来以高强度的管制舆论而闻名,但此次删贴却发生始料未及的反作用,网民却如同接龙赛一般,利用各种方式,例如截图文章、表情图代号、甲骨文、拼音等,无所不用其极,只为了让文章继续在网络流传。 为何《发哨子的人》格外引起注意? 此次《发哨子的人》为何会格外引起注意,其中缘由为该篇报道首次公开,艾芬是“吹哨人”李文亮医生所发出的“SARS冠状病毒”检测报告照片的拍摄者。 此外,艾芬也透露有关部门在疫情初期时,刻意压制信息的细节。 文中提到,艾芬与李文亮、江学庆、梅仲明均为武汉市中心医院任职的医生,于12月医治一名高烧不退的病人,以及一名肺部感染近10天的病人。 12月30日,她接到一份不明肺炎病人的病毒检测报告,上面写着“SARS 冠状病毒”。她深知后面的影响,随即将其上报,并将报告发给医生同学。 之后该份报告在武汉医生之间流传,其中转发的人也包括李文亮医生。当时李文亮医生所公开的报告截图,即是艾芬所拍摄。…

Australian expat being investigated for alleged punching incident

By Tiffany Gwee An Australian expatriate, Mr Aaron Jeremiejczyk, who was accused…