Reading this study conducted by Yale in relation to fear and its relationship with conservative views, it becomes clear to me why Singaporeans seem so unwilling to embrace change. Even if there are things that people are not happy about, it takes a lot for us to be willing to try something different.

According to reports by Yale, fear is ingrained young and once ingrained, those so indoctrinated are strongly motivated to stay free from harm. at all cost even if it defies logic.

Only when they feel “safe” will they embrace more liberal ideals. Translate this into a Singaporean context, is this why we seem so reluctant to even consider anything against the grain?

Is there the misplaced notion that anything remotely “different” or non conforming is “unsafe” and therefore should be avoided at cost? Does this explain our aversion to change? Taking another step back, has this fear been ingrained young and has the government played a part in this indoctrination of fear?

We certainly like to pigeon hole things. This goes straight to the heart of government administration. From the forms that we have to fill in to our NRIC details, everything has to “fit” So much so that mixed race people have to be forced into category – ie. People of Philippine descent as Malays – just so they are put somewhere. Even if it doesn’t fit, it will be made to fit.

Is this efficiency or is it blind adherence out of fear? After all, this is how we have managed to have a Malay President who is arguably Indian. Jokes aside, is this why we are blindly loyal to the notion that there is no better party than the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) to lead the country?

Now, I am not suggesting that they aren’t the best party. All I am saying is this –  are we consistently returning them to power because we genuinely feel they are the best or because of baseless fear for change?

Applying the Yale study to a Singaporean context, it may well be possible that we have been ingrained with fear since young and as adults blindly make decisions based on fear. I don’t have concrete answers on this but it is certainly food for thought worth exploring ahead of the next election.

If we do decide that the PAP is indeed the right party for us. It must be for the right reasons. It cannot simply be a fear based reaction. Otherwise, we end up shortchanging ourselves and our future generations to come.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens encourage people to support elderly cobbler near Holland Village MRT

Cobbling is a slowly dying trade, even before the pandemic which has…

There is no justification in for treating migrant workers like prisoners by locking them up for months, says TWC2

Given that the Government has announced that there are no new COVID-19…

PM Lee: SG needs "new people" to fill new towns and industries; population can grow “a little bit” more

At an event organised by the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry…

【冠状病毒19】新增四入境病例来自印度 三人是年龄一至六岁孩童

本地在今日(5日)新增908例冠状病毒19确诊。在今天下午的简报中,该部解释这批乃最后一批客工,当局预计未来几日新增病例将偏高,直至工作小组完成宿舍的检测为止,才减少。 在今日新增入境病例中,都来自印度,其中三名年龄仅介于一至六岁,持家属准证((Dependant’s Pass),以及一名63岁的短期探访准证持有者。 四人是在7月22日抵境并遵守居家通知,也在这期间接受冠病检测。 至于社区病例则是一名26岁孟加拉籍男子,未出现症状,是在当局未宿舍外必要服务客工进行检测时发现的。 另一方面,今日有314人出院,累计出院人数4万7768个。