Following the controversy surrounding the viral video featuring two of its officers and a lorry driver near Woodlands Checkpoint last Friday (21 Dec), the Immigrations and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) announced the next day that it has turned in the matter to the Singapore Police Force.

ICA added in its statement that the decision was taken after concluding its “preliminary investigations”, and added that officers in question “have also been taken off operational duties pending the Police investigation”.

The Authority said that its findings “showed that the two officers, who were performing traffic control duties at Woodlands Crossing, was directing the container truck which was on its way to Woodlands Checkpoint for departure clearance”.

It added: “The truck driver, who was driving on the rightmost lane of the three-lane Woodlands Centre Road, disregarded the officers’ instructions and drove recklessly across three lanes into the officers’ direction, endangering the lives of the officers and other road users.”

“The officers,” claimed ICA, “confronted the driver and engaged” in what it called “a physical altercation” with said driver.

“ICA takes a serious view of this incident. Our officers are expected to discharge their duties professionally.

“ICA does not condone such behaviour, even if the driver may have disregarded the safety of others,” the Authority concluded.

Several netizens have criticised ICA’s course of action and argued that the penalty enforced against the officers appears to be too lenient in comparison to the officers’ treatment of the lorry driver:

Other netizens rationalised the action taken by the ICA officers in the video, adding that their supervisors and ICA’s upper rung of management should have provided support instead of punishing them, as netizens believe that the officers were acting out of necessity in the face of potentially grave danger posed by the lorry driver:

The video, which has garnered approximately 118k views as of Tuesday (25 Dec), was first posted on social media All Singapore Stuff’s Facebook page on Saturday (22 Dec).

The admin of the page highlighted that the video was sent in to the page by a reader named Wan, who was quoted as saying:

“Relax la, no matter what crime the lorry driver did, need to beat him like that or not?

“Can i know who is this ICA officer, who tell him got the right to hit the lorry driver, pls take action to this ICA officer… im singaporean and i know the law..”

<Credits: Azman Aziz>

The admin added a note at the end: “Anyway does the video taker have eagle eyes? So far away can confirm say its ICA officer committing the offence?”

A significant number of netizens expressed their shock and dismay over the two officers’ treatment of the driver, with many commenters arguing that such a great degree of force was not at all necessary, even in a situation that necessitates self-defence:

Other netizens appeared to defend the ICA officers’ actions and argued that the officers’ conduct was justified in the name of protecting Singapore’s national security interests:

A few commenters — while acknowledging that the ICA officers did not take the best course of action in dealing with the purportedly reckless and dangerous actions of the driver — appeared to empathise with the officers, given the physically and psychologically demanding nature of their work:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nee Soon MP Lee Bee Wah responds to criticism on wearing 'tudung' in photo on Hari Raya banner, says religious teacher and mosque chairman gave her the green light

The decision to wear a tudung in a photograph on a banner…

Two new cases of Covid-19 infection; One linked to Wizlearn Technologies cluster

As of 3 March 2020, 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

WP now Whiter than White

~Editorial~ It was the move that no one was expecting, and understandably…

【选举】刘韦伶:牵连甚广 无家可归为迫切民生课题

刘韦伶指出,无家可归并非只是失业者的课题,其中也包括没屋遮顶的低薪阶层以及面对租赁问题的居民,她认为这都是迫切需要探讨和解决的民生课题,并提出了数项解决方案。 前进党丹戎巴葛候选人刘韦伶今早(7月8日)在脸书帖文指出,她昨日(7日)和媒体在互动时,提到有关无家可归的课题,以及可以采取的解决方案。 建屋局限制及合租问题 帖文中,她指出,除了失业者,低收入群亦面对无家可归的困境,如清洁工人与保安人员。“他们无可奈何得露宿街头的其中几个主要因素,如想在靠近工作地点租房子,却发现并不便宜;过了午夜时分无法使用公共交通工具及必须在隔天早些时候开始轮班工作。” 她表示,生活工资的定义需要重新探讨,逐步落实具体建议,并为这些底薪群体制定更人道的工作时间,才有希望改善他们的情况。 此外,她认为建屋局对租赁组屋申请者所设下的限制条例,如申请者等待时段、种族固定配额等,以及联合单身计划中同居租户问题,也是导致无家可归的原因。 刘韦伶指出,我国政府朝向房产权国家发展,因此较不支持增加租赁组屋的供应(新加坡公众租赁组屋–不得已的居家抉择,第八页,李光耀政策学院,新加坡国立大学)。 就联合单身计划方便,她披露,有者是因为搭配上不合适的租户而引发冲突,包括需要照顾有肢体或精神残疾的租户,最后选择露宿街头。 租赁房屋欠缺及家庭收入问题 她也就目前受冠状病毒19疫情影响而选择售屋的情况指出,售屋者在当局的规定下,售屋后30个月才能申请入住租赁租屋。 而若家庭总收入被评定有所增加,即表示他们必须缴付更高的租金。同时,有居民指出,租金也可能随着政府批准的家庭每月总收入门槛,即1500元而提高。 因此,她认为增加租赁房屋的供应,缩短等后期,并慎重考虑个人隐私空间,把家庭“总”收入改为净收入正在制定标准,才能更好得解决问题。…