Facebook social media app logo on log-in, sign-up registration page on mobile app screen on iPhone smart devices in business person’s hand at work from Shutterstock.com

Facebook is coming down hard on pages and accounts that spread hate speech and misinformation in respond to strong criticism over their failure to control such malicious posts in the past. Specifically, the social media conglomerate has removed hundreds of pages and accounts in Myanmar with hidden links to the military – that’s 425 pages, 17 groups, and 135 accounts on Facebook and 15 Instagram accounts. One of these pages even had as many as 2.5 million followers.

The deleted accounts were posing as independent news, entertainment, beauty and lifestyle pages with names like ‘Down for Anything’, ‘Let’s Laugh Causally’, and ‘We Love Myanmar’ but in reality were linked to the military and pages that had already been removed in the past which have been identified for spreading misleading and dehumanising content about the stateless Rohingya group. The Rohingya’s were driven out of Myanmar in the tens of thousands by the military earlier last year.

This round of take-downs of pages and accounts is the third wave, following deletions in August and October of what the company calls ‘coordinated inauthentic behaviour’ in Myanmar. In a statement, Facebook says that they do not want people or organisations to create networks of accounts solely to mislead others about who they are and what they’re doing.

Among users that have been blacklisted this year include hardline nationalist monks and top army generals who have been accused by the UN investigators of genocide.

Facebook’s reputation has come under heavy fire these past few years for it’s despairingly slow removal of hate speech from the platform. An independent report commissioned by the social media giants concluded that while Myanmar state was ultimately responsible for human rights abuses, the company should have been more active in preventing the platform from being used to incite violence and form divisions.

So now, Facebook is trying hard to earn back the trust of the people. Facebook have vowed to hire more Myanmar-language reviewers by the end of the year to bring their staff up to 100. However, critics argue that a staff that size won’t be nearly enough to monitor the over 20 million Facebook accounts based in Myanmar, especially since many use a mixture of regional languages as well. Also, the upcoming 2020 elections in Myanmar will surely be a flashpoint for misinformation and abuse and Facebook will need to be ready to deal with an influx of inauthentic content.

Smartphone usage in the Southeast Asian country, and therefore internet presence, has soared in the last few years after Myanmar opened up to the outside world following decades of isolated military rule. Facebook will have to double down their efforts if they are truly interested in preventing the platform being used as a means to spread hate and violence.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Speeches of #Freemyinternet protest

Speeches made during the #Freemyinternet protest event at Hong Lim Park on…

Celebrating diversity rather than single Singapore identity: Ho Kwon Ping

By Howard Lee Noting that former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew has…

OnlyFans reverses sexually explicit content ban

OnlyFans, the platform where people can share erotic photos and videos for…

前学者:大开闸引外劳 激烈人力市场竞争致薪酬拉低

近期,有网民转载分享,一名即将迎来65岁生日的公积金会员,收到了公积金局的来信。信函通知他,在65岁后,可每月从公积金账户中提取250元,为时八年。 不过,如果他有意在65岁就开始提取存款,就必须另行通知当局,否则,就要等到70岁才才能开始提款。 有者舆论,每月250元如何生存,再者八年内每月只能领取250,说明他的公积金存款仅少于三万元。 我们不清楚为何他并没多少公积金积蓄,也许他早年工作几年后,就成了不用还公积金的有钱“头家”,但也可能他是较不幸的群体,半辈子只能到处打零工过活。 无论如何,事实是还有大部分的年长国人,没有足够的公积金积蓄。 去年,人力部长杨莉明在国会指出,2016年,仅53巴仙的公积金会员到了55岁达到全额退休储蓄条件,即达到16万1千元的存款。 相对地,这也意味着,其余有近半、多达47巴仙公积金会员,在2016年年届55岁,仍无法达到全额退休储蓄,乃至最低存款额(8万5500元)的条件。 有些人可能会辩解,公积金存款数额多寡,也和个人薪酬和赚钱能力有关,所以存款少的人只能怪自己没有能力赚得更多。 李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,直接驳斥这种谬论。 刘浩典在一篇文章指出,许多中等和低收入国人的财富增长过去十年来十分缓慢。 “一些证据指出我国服务领域劳工比起其他富有国家缺乏生产力。瑞典的巴士司机、清洁工和建筑工友的生产力可能还优于新加坡。” 不过问题来了:我国素质教育已经普及化,为何贫富差距反而加剧?教育普及化不是理应缩减生产力的差距,从而也能减低薪资差异吗?…