Blurred defocused abstract background of people walking on the street in Orchard Road in Singapore – Crowded city center during rush hour in urban business area zebra crossing – View from building top (Photo by View Apart from Shutterstock.com)

According to latest Ministry of Manpower (MOM) report on the labour market in Singapore, residents in Singapore clocked in 44.9 hours of paid work (standard work hours and paid overtime) per week on average compared to 46.2 hours in 2010. In terms of overtime, workers in Singapore logged 2.9 hours per week this year compared to 3.7 in 2010.

Now, the annual average of paid hours worked remained stagnant between 2010 and 2014, so the decline of work hours really only started in 2014 when it dropped by 0.2 hours the previous year. Technically, that only a decline of 12 minutes.

In terms of the usual hours worked – referring to the number of hours that a person works in a typical week whether paid or not – residents logged an average of 43.2 hours in 2018, down 3.4 hours from 2010 (46.6). In terms of full-time comapred to part-time employees, full-timers worked a total of 45.9 hours per week in 2018 while part-times worked an average of 20.6 hours per week. In 2010, those numbers were 49.2 and 21.6 hours respectively. Since 2010, the average number of usual hours worked has been on a slow but steady decline.

The MOM said that the downtrend in average hours worked is a result of the growing prevalence of part-time work, changes in job composition with more employees working as professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMET), as well gains in productivity via technological advancements.

Although it seems that on average, people in Singapore are working fewer hours, it had been previously reported that certain professions still end up working extremely long hours, well above the national average. Based on MOM’s third quarter report, employees in the transport equipment manufacturing worked 51.3 paid hours per week, the longest among all industries.

One lawyer quoted by Straits Times said that she sometimes worked from 9am to 2 or 3am the next day when trying to keep up with court deadlines. This lawyer, known only as Ms Ho had noted that her peers were of the view that in order to live a healthier lifestyle, they’d had to leave their profession altogether.

In that same article, Straits Times deferred to sociologist Dr Paulin Straughan from the National University of Singapore about MOM’s 2017 labour market report that said the average hours worked by employees in Singapore continued to decrease. Dr Straughan said that thought the government had introduced initiatives to lessen total work hours per week, not all professions can implement those initiatives due to the nature of their work.

Some group of employees, such as front-line officers, are required to be at their workplace and cannot work remotely. So for them, Dr Straughan suggested providing flexible timing to allow them a couple of hours off in the middle of the day when have errands to run.

As an example, Dr Straughan talked about school teachers. “If they have some free time during the day when they are not teaching, it should be fine for them to use that time to run errands and attend to matters. They should not have to stay in school the entire time if they are already clocking such long hours.”

So really, while the total average of actual hours worked per week by employees in Singapore has been on a steady decline for the past 5 years, it’s not true for all industries.

And when comparing to other countries, Singapore residents work a total of 2,366 hours per year in 2016, which is significantly more than other countries that are infamous for their long work hours such as South Korea (2,069 hours) and Japan (1,713 hours) in that same year.

There have also been other reports that are contrary to MOM’s report. A Working Hours Survey by recruitment consultancy Morgan McKinley in 2016 showed that many Singaporeans worked much longer hours than their contracted amount while almost 90% weren’t paid for overtime.

Another survey in 2016 by the Families For Life found that one in 10 of their respondents spends fewer than 6 hours with their family per week, citing long work hours as their main reason.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李光耀孙子婚礼晒全家福

已故建国总理李光耀孙子李桓武与男友上周五(24日)在南非开普敦结婚后,于昨日(28日)晒双方家人合影。照片中可见,出席者包括他的父亲、即是李光耀次子李显扬,其母亲林学芬、哥哥和弟弟,另外还有新婚配偶Heng Yirui及家人。 李桓武在照片中也标记“家人”(Family),并说道“明年见,开普敦”。 当李显扬被《南华早报》问及有关儿子的结婚消息时,表示“我相信若我父亲知道会为之激动。”( “I believe my father would have been thrilled to…

International Commission of Jurists observes Roy Ngerng’s defamation case

After observing the three-day court hearing to determine the amount of damages…

【冠状病毒19】5月26日新增383确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月26日中午12时,本地新增383例冠状病毒19确诊。大多数新增确诊者,为住宿舍工作准证持有者。一名本地居民确诊。 本地累计确诊病例增至3万2343例。 不过,文告指出此次公布新增确诊数据减少,部分原因乃是当局进行较少的冠病测试。当局仍在搜集病例详情并将在晚些时候公布。

对韩咏梅公开信 事主柯政杰提数点反驳

日前,《联合早报》一篇报导《阻断措施期间足不出户 南大生不解为何染疫》,引起事主公开在脸书非议,并没有授权记者使用他的个人资料和照片,也未同意受访。 对此,《联合早报》总编辑韩咏梅也在今日(13日)发表致读者公开信,提及记者违反工作原则,也向事主致歉。 柯政杰在最新的贴文,先是感谢《联合早报》总编辑韩咏梅透过公开信回应。但他也对韩咏梅在信中的一些说法作出反驳。 信中,韩咏梅分享政杰分享的一帧社交媒体贴文,声称该报报导并非虚构,而是而是根据柯先生的社交媒体贴文所写。 这则帖文中柯政杰提及“自己即时“在家”还是确诊了”。但政杰指出,不论是有关记者还是报业控股,都没人向他求证这句话的意思,而他澄清自己所指“在家”,是指遵循阻断措施,停止一些非必要的外部接触。 但《联合早报》却指当事人“足不出户”,且不解为何还确诊。 柯政杰也列出列表,对比记者的报导和事实: 记者的报导 事实 记者称政杰只前往小贩中心打包就回家 以及去过学校…