Blurred defocused abstract background of people walking on the street in Orchard Road in Singapore – Crowded city center during rush hour in urban business area zebra crossing – View from building top (Photo by View Apart from Shutterstock.com)

According to latest Ministry of Manpower (MOM) report on the labour market in Singapore, residents in Singapore clocked in 44.9 hours of paid work (standard work hours and paid overtime) per week on average compared to 46.2 hours in 2010. In terms of overtime, workers in Singapore logged 2.9 hours per week this year compared to 3.7 in 2010.

Now, the annual average of paid hours worked remained stagnant between 2010 and 2014, so the decline of work hours really only started in 2014 when it dropped by 0.2 hours the previous year. Technically, that only a decline of 12 minutes.

In terms of the usual hours worked – referring to the number of hours that a person works in a typical week whether paid or not – residents logged an average of 43.2 hours in 2018, down 3.4 hours from 2010 (46.6). In terms of full-time comapred to part-time employees, full-timers worked a total of 45.9 hours per week in 2018 while part-times worked an average of 20.6 hours per week. In 2010, those numbers were 49.2 and 21.6 hours respectively. Since 2010, the average number of usual hours worked has been on a slow but steady decline.

The MOM said that the downtrend in average hours worked is a result of the growing prevalence of part-time work, changes in job composition with more employees working as professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMET), as well gains in productivity via technological advancements.

Although it seems that on average, people in Singapore are working fewer hours, it had been previously reported that certain professions still end up working extremely long hours, well above the national average. Based on MOM’s third quarter report, employees in the transport equipment manufacturing worked 51.3 paid hours per week, the longest among all industries.

One lawyer quoted by Straits Times said that she sometimes worked from 9am to 2 or 3am the next day when trying to keep up with court deadlines. This lawyer, known only as Ms Ho had noted that her peers were of the view that in order to live a healthier lifestyle, they’d had to leave their profession altogether.

In that same article, Straits Times deferred to sociologist Dr Paulin Straughan from the National University of Singapore about MOM’s 2017 labour market report that said the average hours worked by employees in Singapore continued to decrease. Dr Straughan said that thought the government had introduced initiatives to lessen total work hours per week, not all professions can implement those initiatives due to the nature of their work.

Some group of employees, such as front-line officers, are required to be at their workplace and cannot work remotely. So for them, Dr Straughan suggested providing flexible timing to allow them a couple of hours off in the middle of the day when have errands to run.

As an example, Dr Straughan talked about school teachers. “If they have some free time during the day when they are not teaching, it should be fine for them to use that time to run errands and attend to matters. They should not have to stay in school the entire time if they are already clocking such long hours.”

So really, while the total average of actual hours worked per week by employees in Singapore has been on a steady decline for the past 5 years, it’s not true for all industries.

And when comparing to other countries, Singapore residents work a total of 2,366 hours per year in 2016, which is significantly more than other countries that are infamous for their long work hours such as South Korea (2,069 hours) and Japan (1,713 hours) in that same year.

There have also been other reports that are contrary to MOM’s report. A Working Hours Survey by recruitment consultancy Morgan McKinley in 2016 showed that many Singaporeans worked much longer hours than their contracted amount while almost 90% weren’t paid for overtime.

Another survey in 2016 by the Families For Life found that one in 10 of their respondents spends fewer than 6 hours with their family per week, citing long work hours as their main reason.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

40-yr-old Singaporean woman under police investigation for not wearing mask and allegedly assaulted a 47-yr-old woman at Shunfu Market

A Singaporean woman who was seen not wearing a mask and allegedly…

近五万清寒妇女受惠 乳房检查反应佳乳癌基金会再延长

乳癌基金会昨日(15日)宣布,基于BEAM15(BCF Encouragement for Active Mammograms)的计划实施相当成功,将延续扩大计划的期限。 BEAM15是2013年与健康促进委员会共同合作,提供女性免费拍摄乳房X光片服务。自计划实施以来,已近5万名低收入户妇女接受检查。 在未来的计划,乳癌基金会将承担100万新元,提供未来两年至少2万次的乳房拍摄检查,今后将计划改名为BEAM。 在计划初期,乳癌基金会资助200万新元,在各大医疗诊所包括NHG Diagnostics和保健集团综合诊疗所(SingHealth Polyclinics),共20所,安置乳房摄影技术与乳房檢查流動巴士(Mammobus)。 另一方面,乳癌基金会一直鼓励妇女需提早接受检查,以作早期预防与治疗。BEAM15亦达成增加50岁以上低收入户妇女前往节手乳房摄影技术的检查的目标。2013至2016期间,已逾200案件透过BEAM计划被侦测,协助逾85巴仙的病人提早发现初期乳癌,提高乳癌治愈率。 一名60岁的柯姓妇女(译名)自BEAM15…

People’s rights infringed: Petition created to reject the use of wearable contact tracing device

After reporting that the TraceTogether mobile application could not work well on…

满城尽是黑衣人 港特首林郑月娥致歉

今日(16日),香港民间人权阵线再举办“反送中”集会,再有众多港民踊跃响应,香港政府大楼立法会周边道路如夏悫道等,都挤满穿黑衣的集会群众,至截稿为止人群都未离去,今日集会人数可能超过此前记录。 据了解,原本夏悫道塞满集会群众,不过当有救护车要通行,集会群众马上散开,分出一条车路让救护车优先通过。 面对群众压力,香港行政长官林郑月娥则在今晚8时30分透过文字声明,向港民道歉,承认政府在工作上的不足,令社会产生矛盾和纷争,令市民失望和痛心。 不过他的声明中并没有提及是否会撤回有关逃犯条例。早前,她表示将展延通过该条例修法。 在6月12日,林郑月娥批评示威者破坏社会安宁、罔顾法纪,并指现场状况不是和平集会,而是公然、有组织地发动“暴动”。她也指每当有涉及中央与特区、内地和香港的议题,都会被部分人士挑起矛盾和纷争。 有分析指林郑月娥办事能力恐遭中国中央政府质疑,前者将面对下台压力。 香港政府发言人作出以下回应: 过去两个星期日,十分多市民透过游行表达意见,政府明白市民游行是出于对香港的关心和热爱。 对于市民一直以平和,理性方式表达意见,行政长官清楚听到,并认同这正是香港作为一个文明,自由,开放,多元的社会,一直展现的互相尊重,和而不同的精神。政府重视和珍惜香港这些核心价值。 考虑到社会有强烈不同的意见,政府已停止立法会大会对修订“逃犯条例”的工作,希望借此可让社会尽快回复平静和避免任何人受到伤害。政府重申并无重启程序的时间表。 行政长官承认由于政府工作上的不足,令香港社会出现很大的矛盾和纷争,令很多市民感到失望和痛心,行政长官为此向市民致歉,并承诺会以最有诚意,最谦卑的态度接受批评,加以改进,为广大市民服务。 完…