The conflict surrounding Singapore’s implementation of the Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Seletar Airport can be resolved with some “creativity” on the part of the Republic’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAAS), said Malaysia’s Ministry of Transport (MOT).

Malay Mail reported that the MOT, in a statement on Wednesday (12 Dec), said that it is “fully convinced that with some creativity, the new ILS procedures for Runway 03 on the southern side of Seletar Airport, guaranteed by CAAS during the meeting with CAAM [Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia] on 29 November 2018, would not impose any additional impact on other airspace users as well as businesses and residents in Singapore.”

Touching on Singapore’s MOT’s rationale for releasing the details of the consultations on December 4, Malaysia’s MOT responded that “it would be useful for negotiations to be kept confidential to facilitate frank and constructive exchanges.”

It added that the discussion that took place on 30 Nov was merely a review of the discussion that took place the day prior to that, with the focus being on the new Instrument Landing System (ILS) procedures for Seletar Airport, the Operational Letter of Agreement 1974, and Malaysia’s desire to reclaim its sovereign airspace which has been long granted to Singapore for the purpose of carrying out air traffic services.

Reaffirming its widely known stance regarding the implementation of the ILS, Malaysia’s MOT reiterated that “Singapore’s unilateral move to publish the new ILS procedures for Seletar Airport in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) Singapore is indeed a clear violation of Malaysia sovereignty and international law and standards.”

“The ensuing tensions between both countries, is indeed unnecessary and can be avoided by implementing the new ILS procedures for Runway 03 on the southern side of Seletar Airport, as opposed to Runway 21 on the northern side,” added the Ministry.

The same day, Singapore’s MOT, in its press release, announced that “Singapore would need to put in place instrument flight procedures for both the northerly and southerly approaches into Seletar Airport.”

The Ministry said that in a meeting on 29 November 2018 between CAAM and CAAS, it has maintained that “Singapore would need to put in place instrument flight procedures for both the northerly and southerly approaches into Seletar Airport.”

“Flight procedures for both directions are necessary because aircraft land and take off into the wind. In this region, winds blow from a north-easterly direction for half of the year, and a south-westerly direction for the other half of the year.

“Therefore, flight procedures for a southerly approach cannot safely replace all flight procedures for the northerly approach.

“Hence, CAAS explained to CAAM that in addition to the current ILS procedures for the northerly approaches into Seletar Airport, CAAS will also be implementing instrument flight procedures for the southerly approaches,” said Singapore’s MOT.

Rejecting Malaysia’s claim that the implementation of ILS procedures for the northerly approach into Seletar Airport is a “clear violation of Malaysia sovereignty and international law and standards,” Singapore’s MOT said that “the nature of international civil aviation is such that flights have to traverse the airspace of different States,” adding that it is “not uncommon for flight procedures to/from airports in one State, especially those near other States, to traverse the territories of neighbouring States.”

“This does not entail a violation of the sovereignty of the States being overflown. The instrument flight procedures for some Malaysian airports also extend into the territories of neighbouring States,” stressed Singapore’s MOT.

“Singapore respects Malaysia’s sovereignty,” it added, maintaining that “cross-border airspace management is not incompatible with sovereignty.”

“The purpose of airspace management is to ensure the safety and efficiency of air traffic.”

In its rebuttal against Malaysia’s claim, Singapore’s MOT said: “Malaysia had agreed to Singapore’s management of the airspace over Southern Johor in 1973 and a bilateral agreement was signed in 1974 to operationalise this agreement.”

“The ILS procedures for Seletar Airport were published in accordance with Singapore’s responsibilities under the relevant ICAO requirements as well as the bilateral arrangements with Malaysia,” said the Ministry.

“Singapore had nonetheless consulted Malaysia since December 2017 in the spirit of goodwill,” it said, and claimed that “Malaysia has never raised any objections to the existing flight profile in place for Seletar Airport which the ILS procedures adhere to.”

The Ministry, however, added that “in the spirit of cooperation and mutual benefit, we are prepared to discuss Malaysia’s technical concerns in good faith.”

“On 4 December 2018, Malaysia Minister of Transport Anthony Loke stated that Malaysia would be giving Singapore its counterproposal.

“We look forward to receiving Malaysia’s counterproposal, and would be pleased to meet with Malaysia thereafter,” concluded Singapore’s MOT.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH seeks public feedback on whether tax should be imposed on sugar-sweetened drinks or ban them all together

Citing diabetes as a serious health concern in Singapore, for having the…

Viral photo of workers protesting, said to be dated incident in May involving sub-contractor of Lian Beng Construction

A video and photo that have been circulating on social media and…

Netizens are hoping Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan doesn’t jinx the rail network with his comments on public transport

Speaking on the sidelines of an event about the upgrading of the…

反诉总理申请被驳回 梁实轩被索讨支付2.1万诉讼费

代表总理李显龙,提告时评人梁实轩的文达星律师楼,致函要求梁必须在本月21日下午5点前,为两张法庭诉讼传票支付总额2万1000新元的费用。 有关信函誌期3月14日,告知梁实轩的代表律师林鼎,高庭法官已在3月12日,批准了SUM148(驳回梁实轩反诉总理)的诉讼申请。与此同时,驳回SUM428(反诉总理滥用司法程序)的申请。 信中指法官要求梁实轩为SUM148传票支付6000元,另一传票则需支付1万5000元。 梁实轩是在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 不过,法官Aedit Abdullah在上周裁决,驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩于去年11月遭总理提告诽谤,指出梁分享的贴文内容毫无根据,诋毁总理人格和声誉。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 然而,梁实轩当时纯粹分享贴文,也未留下任何个人评述和留言。他已遵循资媒局指示撤下了贴文,但还是被总理以法律诉讼对付。