Source: https://static.businessinsider.my/sites/3/2018/06/Malaysia-Prime-Minister-Dr-Mahathir-Mohamad-Putrjaya-Reuters.jpg

Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has declared that Malaysian vessels will remain present in the maritime territory that has become the subject of contention between Singapore and its northern neighbour.

Speaking at a press conference at the Anti-Corruption Excellence Award at the Malaysian Institute of Integrity in Kuala Lumpur on Monday (Dec 10), Dr Mahathir said: “At the moment, because there is no decision, the vessels are there.”

He added: “Singaporean vessels are there, our vessels are there.”

Stressing that the relationship between Malaysia and Singapore is “good”, the prime minister said: “We will discuss with Singapore. We do not want to argue with Singapore.”

“Sometimes, there are overlapping (boundary) claims and we can solve this with discussions,” he said.

In a press release on the same day, Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that it has agreed to Singapore’s “counter-proposed dates” for talks regarding the maritime dispute in January next year.

The statement also read: “While the Government of Malaysia is unable to accede to Singapore’s counter-proposal, Malaysia will take all effective measures to de-escalate the situation on the ground, reaffirming its position to handle the situation in a calm and peaceful manner.”

Previously, Malaysia’s Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah was quoted as saying by Malaysiakini on Friday (7 Dec) that both nations ought to cease sending vessels into the disputed territory starting midnight as an interim measure to cool the conflict.

Saifuddin also highlighted: “It is the hope of the Malaysian government that the meeting could be convened sometime in the middle of this month.”

Additionally, Malaysia had also sent a protest note against Singapore’s reclamation works off Tuas, as Singapore’s Port Marine Circular No 9 on 6 Dec was “a unilateral port limit extension which encroached on the Johor Bahru port limits indicated under Gazette PU (B) 587 2018 on 25 Oct”.

“The government of Malaysia therefore called upon the government of Singapore to withdraw its Port Marine Circular No 9,” said Saifuddin, as the extension “is a clear violation of Malaysia’s sovereignty and international law.”

The same day, Singapore’s Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen issued a statement via Facebook, accompanied by a video illustrating the supposed intrusions of Malaysian vessels into Singapore’s territorial waters.

Dr Ng wrote: “For 20 years or more, the Republic of Singapore Navy and Police Coast Guard ships have patrolled our Singapore Territorial Waters at Tuas. Out of nowhere, Malaysian Government vessels now claim these waters as theirs and have been continually intruding since November.”

“These are serious violations of Singapore’s sovereignty. Our security forces have acted with restraint despite continuing intrusions and provocations. Singaporeans are peace-loving, but I strongly caution violators to leave Singapore territorial waters,” warned Dr Ng.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

徐顺全:人民先于营利、权益先于显贵、智慧先于财富

新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全在上周六举办募款午宴,获得英华自主中学校友同窗踊跃支持。 在致词中,他阐述教育之重要,例如当看见国内年长者必须工作、收纸皮来保障下一餐温饱;当国家面对贫富不均、流浪者露宿街头、麦当劳,但总理自己仍领取高薪,他在英华学校所受的教育,唤起他的良知,深知不能坐视不管。 “当我们的公民被无审讯扣留、生理和心理上被侵害,我所受的教育不容许我保持沉默;当统治派系计划透过《防假消息法》勒紧对网络的困索,我所受的教育再次唤醒我。当总理和他的夫人自封为国家主权基金的监护者,我所受的教育激起我的愤怒。” 他形容,如果看见了这些,还选择当鸵鸟漠视保持沉默,有违自己在英华学校接受的教诲,只有站出来捍卫正义、为弱势发声和反抗那些打压者,才是教育之大义。 不过,他坦言,即便出席午宴的在座昔日同窗,如今都算是各领域的“精英”–医生、律师、飞机师、总裁等等,但是身为精英群体,与选择继续鼓吹精英主义,是有区别的,你可以选择走入基层扶起大家;或者在阶梯上抹上油膏,刻意让其他人更能往上爬,“但肯定后者绝不是我们母校的信条”。 他也认为,英华自主中学校训“精益求精”(The Best is Yet to Be)绝不是要大家踩着别人致富,而是让我们成为更好的自己,为别人挺身而出。 徐顺全也指责,在总理李显龙和其执政团队治下,对于创新发展的成绩乏善可陈,他认为权力集中在少数、从人民身上移走财富加之营造恐惧的分为,都使得国家的政经和知识发展被掣肘。…

Theories behind the sinking of KRI Nanggala-402 submarine

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — Indonesia and the world mourned the sinking of Indonesia’s…

新加坡能复制大马变天?(3) “自由主义专制国” 覃炳鑫:行动党营造恐惧层层操控

历史学者覃炳鑫认为,新加坡当权政府人民行动党对国家公器的使用和社会结构操控,都有别于马来西亚。他从历史进展过程和体制角度,分析新马两国的不同之处,阐述新加坡当权者,拥有极度倾斜的选举游戏规则、高度集中的权利,还有近乎包山包海的社会文化控制,成为新加坡变天的层层阻碍。 从社会经济层面,国阵并没有如人民行动党一般,集中式地垄断政权。“1955年选举,国阵横扫51席。不过在一些地方议会却败给反对党(而后国阵索性取消掉地方议会选举,直到今天仍未回复)。在此后选举,也无法掌控一些州属政权,如吉兰丹和登嘉楼。” “1969年,513事件爆发,当时国阵宣布进入紧急状态、悬空国会,推出新经济政策、国家五大原则等有利国阵政权的政策。在1974年,说服民政党和伊斯兰党加入国阵。” 覃炳鑫是在本月18日,出席在邻国柔佛举行的“新加坡能复制大马变天?”时事论坛上,列出处以上历史事实,让出席者了解马新两国、国阵和人民行动党之间的差异,从而得知两国面对的不同处境。 他说明,国阵从未如行动党般,享有过绝对论断的政权,马国幅员较广、社群多元,政治体制分为多层次。 相对下,人民行动党在1959年取得政权后,马上废除地方议会、市镇会选举,权力集中,取消各独立组织,或以新组织取而代之,例如直接由总理管辖的人民协会。 再者,破坏新闻独立,把所有媒体由国家掌控。至于可能成为异议分子温床的律师公会、宗教团体、工会和独中等,不是被收编就是被废除。 https://youtu.be/jng2bchnu-U 一个“自由主义专制国” 他引述《悉尼先驱晨报》对人民行动党的描述: 透过司法、控制媒体、以及恶法打压异议份子,藉此牢牢掌控政权。新加坡属自由民主(liberal democracy)政体,但是有形无实,使他成为一个“自由主义专制国家”(liberal…