Source: Today Online.

The replacement tender of the Tampines Expressway (TPE)-Pan-Island Expressway (PIE) Changi Viaduct has been awarded to Hwa Seng Builder Pte Ltd at a contract sum of $95.6 million.

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) stated in a press release on Monday (10 December) that works are expected to commence in first quarter of 2019 and the indicative completion date for this project is the first half of 2022.

LTA said that Hwa Seng Builder Pte Ltd will be responsible for completing the construction of the viaduct, including the demolition of any structures deemed unsafe.

According to LTA, Hwa Seng Builder Pte Ltd is an established contractor who has completed various road construction projects. They recently completed the new road link connecting Punggol Central to Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway (KPE) and TPE(PIE) which was opened to traffic on 25 Nov 2018 as part of the first phase of the expansion of the KPE/TPE Interchange.

When completed, the TPE-PIE Changi Viaduct will provide a direct connection for motorists travelling from TPE(Changi) to PIE(Westbound) and Upper Changi Road East by bypassing the stretch of TPE(Changi) between Loyang Flyover and Upper Changi Flyover and the existing signalised junctions with Loyang Ave and Upper Changi Road North, the authority said.

Source: LTA.

During the fatal incident last year, the former contractor for the project, Or Kim Peow (OKP) Contractors was carrying out works to cast the decking for the viaduct when a section of the structure collapsed. By that time, eleven workers from China, India and Bangladesh were working on top of the structure. Chinese National Chen Yichuan was killed, while the others were taken to Changi General Hospital with injuries.

According to the authority, a multi-agency probe into the collapse found that corbels – brackets that help support beams – had given way. They also found cracks in the areas supporting 11 other parts of the viaduct. As a result of the findings, LTA decided to demolish all the crossheads on the uncompleted sections of the TPE-PIE viaduct, as a safety precaution.

In July this year, Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan announced that LTA had reached an agreement to terminate its contract with OKP Contractors and will also recover appropriate costs.

Earlier in May, OKP Contractors and five individuals, who are OKP’s group managing director Or Toh Wat, project director Yee Chee Keong, project engineer Wong Kiew Hai, CPG Consultants’ professional engineer Robert Arianto Tjandra and Leong Sow Hon, an executive with Calibre Consulting Singapore, were charged under the Building Control and the Workplace, Safety and Health Acts for their roles in the incident.

The incident was not the first one for OKP. The company was convicted and fined only days before the tragic incident for separate workplace safety lapses and the death of a worker in 2015.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH confirms additional 614 cases of COVID-19 infection; brings tally to 30,426

As of Friday noon (22 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

外交部:我国立场一致 马国已失检讨水价权利

马国外交部长赛夫丁昨日指出,根据1962年新马水供协议第14条阐明,协定在25年后应获得检討,而不是25年之內。 不过,我国外交部针对媒体提问,发文告表示,新加坡的立场始终明确、一致,即马国已经失去了检讨水价的权利。 文告也解释,目前并没有检讨水价。在去年11月12日,马国首相敦马到访,与总理针对水供协议有不同观点,他们也表示有意由两国官员进行进一步的商议,以更好地理解两国在检讨水价一事上的立场。 去年12月,两国总检察长也曾会面一事,不过因为柔佛港口界限和实里达机场ILS系统风波,讨论未取得进展。双方接下来会再次会晤,继续磋商。 “我国理解马外长赛夫丁表示,如果我国不愿谈判,马国会将此事带上国际仲裁。”较早前,马国首相马哈迪也曾说,我国不愿意这么做,是因为我国知道会败诉。 对此,外交部指出,新加坡一直以来都准好好,在双方同意的调解条件和基础上,通过合适的国际第三方来厘清纠纷。实际上,早在2003年,时任外长贾古玛就表示,我国愿意把有关纠纷交由国际仲裁庭解决。 马外长:维文言论“鲁莽” 马国外长赛夫丁是在昨日与国会驳斥维文的说法,表示对后者在国会针对水供协议作出“鲁莽”(马来语melulu)的评述,感到惊讶。 他驳斥维文指马国不尊重1962年水供协议,指马国无权在25年后检討。 他指出,水供协定第14条阐明,协定在25年后应获得检討,而不是25年之內。 “不明白维文如何诠释” “鉴于此,我不明白维文是用何种英语来诠释此事。正是因为我们尊重协定,所以我们才说马国可以在25年后检討该协定。”…

社论:律政部与通讯新闻部联合声明是否存谬误?

本周二,新加坡前进党发表声明,指责《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》赋予部长权力,来宣布哪些消息内容是假的,但欠缺明确的阐释和标准,该党认为这并不符合透明和问责的原则。 尽管该党认同,政府有必要采取迅速行动避免假消息散布,但也强调,要裁定哪些新闻是假消息、该做出怎样的惩处,为了彰显中立理应由新加坡法庭来处理。 然而,律政部联合通讯及新闻部也很快在隔日作出反驳,该部坚称,该法下要求部长明确说明为何相关内容存伪。如何定夺虚假讯息也有法律先例可循。 反问毕博渊言论自由可曾被抑制? 该部还反问,毕博渊只是被要求更正网络贴文,他的言论自由可曾被抑制? 律政和通讯及新闻部也指责,前进党声称部长可随意施加任何惩处。该部反驳部长可给予更正指示;如相关人士拒绝遵循,只有法庭可以施加惩处。 不过吊诡的是,本社记者重新阅读新加坡前进党在本月10日发表的声明,从头到尾都未指控部长可随意施加任何惩处。 联合声明存误导论点? 本社主编许渊臣则在英语站发表社论,点出两部门联合声明中似乎存有误导性论点。 许渊臣认为,该部试图解释,只要涉事者遵守更正指示,就不会遭到惩罚;然而,前者质疑若根据《防假消息法》第七项,并没有阐明被指示要求更正者不会受到任何检控。 此外,要不要提控前进党党员毕博渊和时政网站“States Times…

Ramadan festive stall closed by NEA for two weeks

A festive goodies stall set up for Ramadan in Bukit Batok has…