Landscape of Singapore city in day morning time from Shutterstock.com

With the accelerating tension between Malaysia and Singapore over disputed waters,  I cannot help but think that unity between all of our elected representatives is all important. In view of this, I am heartened to read the statement issued by the Workers’ Party expressing grave concerns over the rising tensions and expressing solidarity with all Singaporeans.

It is important to remember that at this point, the Workers’ Party still has the albatross of a high profile lawsuit against its own town councils hanging around its neck. I would hope that just as the Workers’ Party would like to stand united with all Singaporeans, that the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) will similarly recognise that party politics aside, the Workers’ Party are members of the government too. At this point, I would hope that all differences be set aside and everyone in power can work together for the good of Singapore.

While the lawsuit is not directly related to the PAP dominated government, the whole saga erupted at the behest of the Housing Development Board (HDB) which is a statutory board – in other words, government affiliated.

Even if the government is removed from the process in paper, is it possible for this whole debacle to have turned into a lawsuit without the government’s sanction? Some have speculated that the lawsuit was potentially motivated to take down the Workers’ Party ahead of the rumoured general elections next year. While there is no hard evidence that this is indeed the case, the government does have a history of taking out defamation suits against opposition politicians.

Friction with our neighbour, Malaysia aside, there are also other issues in Singapore to contend with – such as the rising inequality in Singapore. So much so that the issue of a lack of workers’ rights have been raised in the Australian Parliament! With these arguably more pressing issues in sight, it would perhaps be a good time for the government to put aside differences with opposition parties and focus instead on issues that affect our country as opposed to a seeming dispute between political parties.

Perhaps it might be a good time for the Workers’ Party and the PAP to issue a joint statement of solidarity at this juncture. Whether or not the PAP likes the Workers’ Party, it is a fact that members of both parties collectively form our elected Parliament. Even if they are in the minority, they are still elected by the people. .

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Allowing exiles film is "like allowing jihadi terrorist groups" to show film publicly

In its latest attempt at explaining why the film by Tan Pin…

王瑞杰要促进年轻人工作生活平衡 网民:只是梦幻理论

“政府不久将会推出一系列对话,以帮助年轻的父母们在工作和生活上取得平衡。”副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰表示,这是之前推介各种其他措施的额外措施,比如2013年推出的陪产假,允许父亲们拥有更多时间陪伴他们的孩子。 王瑞杰出席6月16日,由非营利组织“好爸爸中心”(Centre for Fathering)旗下“终身为父”(Dads for Life)运动,以及新传媒联合举办的父亲节嘉年华Dad’s Day Out上,发表以上谈话。他也透露,有关的系列谈话将由人力部长杨莉明负责。 “一个家庭最大的困难之一,就是学着如何平衡工作和与孩子共度的时光。我和妻子之前工作,也为这项事情挣扎过……雇主也应该考虑,如何为全部父母们创造更好地工作和生活和谐的工作环境。” 网友盼制定可行方案 另一方面,人力部长杨莉明周日在其脸书上说道“在任何地方,父亲是否有权享有陪产假,对工作场所和文化规范而言是非常重要的。在很多工作与生活和谐相关的问题上,我对彼此行为塑造的期望比政策来得强。这就是为什么我认为这个话题值得和需要我们集思并付诸行动。” 她说道,“身为个人,我们必须做出什么选择,才能取得更好的工作和生活和谐?作为整个社会,我们应该如何更好地相互支持彼此,以取得工作、个人和家庭的平衡?”…

【国会】议员倡议直播国会议事 傅海燕称现有国会资讯管道“即时、方便”

昨日(5月5日),官委议员王丽婷和工人党非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera),不约而同呼吁国会应进行直播,让民众也能理解和跟进国会针对疫情和其他重大政策的讨论。 不过,国会领袖傅海燕则指出,广播并不在此次宪法修正案的讨论事项。再者民众目前仍能以现有的方式,“即时、方便地”获取国会议事内容。 昨日国会三读通过宪法修正案,允许部分国会议员在国会外的地点,也能连线参与议事,确保疫情不会影像国会运作。不过有鉴于本地疫情渐缓,国会暂未启动相关安排。 国会直播有助民众了解国会辩论、决策过程 对此,贝理安就认为,若安排国会可在不同地点连线议事,那么肯定需安排和投资在直播的程序。如果将来这种举措还会持续,那么不妨藉此尝试直播,测试民众对国会直播的需求量如何。 他认为,直播国会会议有助民众了解国会议事、决策和辩论的过程,也能吸引民众向他们的代议士提供反馈。 这不是他首次提倡国会直播。在2017年11月她曾作出相关询问,但当时,通讯与新闻部高级政务部长徐芳达却指,国人收看国会直播的需求不大。 “消弭不对等” 至于官委议员王丽婷则指出,回溯2018年议长陈川仁也曾指出“任何发生在国会的事,都会对新加坡和国人带来影响”,故此让民众有机会看国会直播,能消弭资讯不对等、消除错误信息,以及促进更有建设性的公共讨论。 她也举例,即便跨政府部门抗疫小组的新闻发布会也是直播的,民众能够即时获取当前防疫资讯,实现信息透明和问责的领导能力。这有助增强民众对抗疫的信心。 也是文化、社区及青年部长的傅海燕,则指出宪法修正案未讨论广播的事项,再者民众目前仍能以现有的方式,“即时、方便地”获取国会议事内容。…

Medisave: Needy forced to go to private clinics?

by Leong Sze Hian I  refer to the reply by Marine Parade…