As a registered charity with an Institution of Public Character (IPC), the Singapore Environment Council (SEC) should be displaying their annual financial returns and statements on their website for public scrutiny.

However, a check on their website has shown that the last statement which was uploaded was put up for the financial year ending 2016.

The annual statement of accounts for 2017 has not been posted on their website, even though it is already the end of 2018.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors is Isabella Loh Wai Kiew while the other people on the Board include senior civil servants and also two People’s Action Party Members of Parliament in Dr Teo Ho Pin and Rahayu Mahzam.

The senior public officers on the Board of the SEC include Dr Leong Chee Chiew (Dy CEO, NParks) and Tan Nguan Sen (Chief Sustainability Officer, PUB) among others.

See full list of Board members here.

On its website, the SEC states that it is an independently managed, non-profit and non-government organisation and that it is an approved charity and offer tax exemption to donors.

It appears that it has been more than a year since the SEC posted its annual returns online.

Coincidentally, the Singapore Life Saving Society has put up a Facebook post seeking governance help.

The Advisor of the Singapore Life Saving Society is Teo Ho Pin, who is the MP for Bukit Panjang SMC.

The TOC has reached out to the Charities Unit for a response.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

五年前被指杀人、被引渡槟城关四个月 公民莫汉要向当局讨说法

“很多人都以为我杀了人… 我在工作场所众目睽睽下当众被逮捕,这是天大的耻辱。” 50岁的莫汉(Mohan Rajangam),原本在一家物流公司兢兢业业,但是五年前,他原本平静的日子却迎来了天翻地覆的可怕经历—-他被指控涉嫌一宗在马来西亚槟城发生的谋杀案,警方直接突击他的工作场所搜查并逮捕他,而后再被转交马国。 他在马国逗留长达四个月,但是马国法庭未提控他,最终因未涉及谋杀嫌疑被释放。然而这段经历却让他饱受煎熬,除了健康受影响,他也为此丢失工作。莫汉选择在生活重归轨道的五年后,才愿意口述自己的故事。 一切来得太突然 莫汉忆述,2015年的3月21日,近20名警官突然杀到他的工作地点,“我把我的身份证给他们看,然后他们带着我上公司三楼翻查所有事物,再为我上手铐,去翻查我的车,搜出我的护照”。他指警方搜查时没有说明任何理由。 较后他被押到广东民大厦,接着到肃毒局做尿检、被私会党取缔组问话。莫汉表示他如实告诉他所知的,两个部门都认为他与案子没关联,让他待在拘留处。 莫汉提及其中一位调查官在审问时态度非常恶劣,只是简单问他谋杀案发生当晚他在哪里、做什么,也没在手提电脑上做记录. 莫汉认为,直到罪证确凿,一个人都不应被当成犯人看待,而他感到有关调查官似乎已把他当作犯人;且在被拘留的48小时期间,也未有法律代表。 “48小时后,我以为他们要释放我…但他们为我的手脚上手铐,带我到法庭。其中一位传译员念到’我在2015年3月2日晚9时20分,我在乔治市枪杀一名印裔男子’,我忘了叫什么名。” 莫汉指的枪杀案,死者名为51岁的斯瓦古玛(E…

Minister of Home Affairs issues POFMA correction orders to The Online Citizen Asia and Terry Xu

The Minister of Home Affairs (MHA) has instructed the Pofma Office to issue correction directions to The Online Citizen Asia (TOC) and Terry Xu regarding an incident involving police and an elderly woman. The Ministry of Home Affairs stated that the police’s primary aim was to assist the woman. Xu, however, disputes the account and urges the public to view the body-worn camera footage to make up their own minds on the issue.

【选举】李显扬发长文《品格与勇气》 质问是否仍要拥护行动党“天生贵族”机制?

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬,自宣布加入前进党后,经常公开呼吁人民支持在野党。尽管在此次大选中未参与任何的竞选,但在竞选期间亦频频现身前进党候选人的选区,以示对前进党的支持。 他亦于今早(5日)以中、英和马来文三语,发表长文声援前进党,除了赞许在野党候选人是为民发声的人,同时也比较在野党候选人与人民行动党候选人,指如今的国会已然成为官员谋取更高职位的垫脚石,非为人民发声之地,质问人民是否应该继续拥护人民行动党“天生贵族”的机制。 “这个大选年,新加坡涌现了许多可靠和能干的在野党选人。这群候选人不但有爱心,而且也很真实。他们拥有高尚的品格与资历。更重要的是,他们已全力以赴准备为新加坡国人,无畏地表达他们的需求。“ “与他们相反的,正正是苍白无色的PAP竞选人。对他们而言,国会只是谋取更高官职的垫脚石。纸上文凭和多年来的塑造粉饰,是否造就了更优秀或更强大的领袖?人民行动党(PAP)系统是否有助加强4G领袖的表现?我们是否还要继续拥护PAP的“天生贵族”机制?” 在野党的困境VS人民行动党的一帆风顺 李显扬也提及在野党候选人近年来所面对的困境,经常面对不公平对待与人格抹黑,甚至是亲友的打击,但他也表示,在野党候选人无所畏惧,因为他们关心的是国家的未来,因此相当佩服他们的勇气。 “相对于成为人民行动党(PAP)的候选人,成为反对党候选人需要品格和勇气,后者体现的是为国家牺牲的意愿。反对党候选人经常成为不公平对待、人格抹黑的受害者,而且也必须面对亲朋戚友的打击。然而,这些候选人选择站出来,为全民追求公正与平等。他们选择为人民发声,因为他们关心我们国家的未来。” 反观,他指出,人民行动党国会议员的政途一帆风顺,甚至可以进入内阁,或获得高薪职位。 “PAP国会议员的政途都一帆风顺,有者获得进入内阁、有者获得非常高薪的政治职位,而另一些则获颁董事职位及各种其它职位。” 李显扬:自己检查自己是行不通的 此外,他也阐述两者在国会上的立场,形容人民行动党,因党鞭(Party whip)的推动与对党的义务,加上各种回报,因此根据党的指示投票是意料中事,反观在野党会质疑一些不受欢迎的政策,并合理质询,避免出现滥权。他也提及各在野党候选人如前进党秘书长陈清木医生、工人党等。…

PSP’s Kala Manickam rebuts opponent K Shanmugan’s claim that the party’s Nee Soon GRC team has no plans

“The incumbents live in a different world and have a different concept…