Drinks in refrigerator in super market from Shutterstock.com

Citing diabetes as a serious health concern in Singapore, for having the highest prevalence of diabetes among developed nations, Ministry of Health is seeking feedback from the public on what measures Singapore can take to reduce the intake of sugar from pre-packaged sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) so as to combat the rising trend of diabetes.

The public consultation will be held from 4 December 2018 to 25 January 2019.

MOH had earlier declared a War on Diabetes in 2016 to mobilise a whole-of-society effort to tackle the disease. It adopted a multipronged strategy through ;prevention through healthy living; regular screening and follow up for early detection and intervention; and better disease management, anchored on public education, community outreach and industry partnership.

It noted that while the War on Diabetes has seen encouraging signs of progress, but more needs to be done to create a supportive environment for Singaporeans to lead healthier lifestyles, and to live free from diabetes.

MOH points out that Singaporeans are consuming on average twelve teaspoons (or 60g) of sugar daily. More than half of Singaporeans’ daily sugar intake comes from SSBs, of which pre-packaged SSBs contribute 64 per cent of this intake. More pre-packaged SSBs are consumed per person per day in Singapore than in many other Asian jurisdictions.

It further noted that although the average sugar level of all pre-packaged SSBs has fallen from five to three teaspoons over the past 10 years, the average sugar level for those with medium- and higher-sugar level has remained high at five teaspoons. These medium- and higher-sugar products make up over half of the total sales of pre-packaged SSBs in Singapore.

Possible Measures for Consultation

MOH claims to have carefully reviewed the measures and practices adopted by other countries, and studied their impact in these countries. Therefore, it is seeking views on four possible measures, which are not mutually exclusive, towards pre-packaged SSBs. MOH says that these measures aim to accelerate industry reformulation to reduce sugar levels in pre-packaged SSBs, and empower Singaporeans to make informed and healthier choices.

(I) Mandatory Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label

To help consumers make healthier choices, one possible measure is to introduce a mandatory front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label on pre-packaged SSBs. This will empower consumers to readily identify the range of less healthy SSBs ‒ those high in sugar and other nutrients such as saturated fats ‒ and complement the existing Healthier Choice Symbol programme, which is voluntary and marks out only the healthier drinks.

Evidence has shown that FOP nutrition-summary labels, as compared to a full listing of nutrition information, are more effective in helping consumers easily identify products with higher sugar content and/or poorer nutrition quality, as these do not require sophisticated nutrient knowledge. Overseas experience has also shown that adoption of such labels is slow and biased towards healthier products when implemented on a voluntary basis.

(II) Advertising Regulations

Studies have found that exposure to advertisements of less healthy food and drinks influences choice and induces consumption, especially among children. The WHO also concluded that there is “unequivocal evidence that the marketing of unhealthy foods and SSBs promotes childhood obesity”. Studies also show that restricting advertisements can reduce consumption of the product of concern. Many jurisdictions have enacted laws restricting advertisements of less healthy food and drinks.

Currently Singapore has voluntary guidelines to limit the advertising of less healthy food and drinks to children which cover only limited TV time-belts and media channels. There are no guidelines to address the needs of the general population. A possible measure is to regulate advertisements of less healthy SSBs in the mass media, including on online channels, to reduce their influence on consumer preferences. The possible options are:

  • Make the current restrictions mandatory and expand them to include more TV time-belts and media channels that children are exposed to; or
  • Ban advertising across all time-belts and mass media channels.

 (III) Excise Duty on Manufacturers and Importers

Globally, there has been increased momentum to combat obesity and diabetes through fiscal measures. Currently, about 45 jurisdictions have imposed excise duties on SSBs including Brunei, Thailand, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and cities in the United States of America such as Berkeley, California. Experiences in these jurisdictions show that excise duties are effective in spurring industry reformulation to reduce sugar content in drinks.

A possible measure is to introduce an excise duty on manufacturers and importers of pre-packaged SSBs, to encourage the industry to reformulate and reduce the sugar content in their products. The objective of imposing duties on SSBs, if introduced, is not for revenue generation, but to shape the behaviour of manufacturers and consumers. Duties on SSBs aim to encourage manufacturers to reformulate their products and to encourage consumers to choose healthier drinks that are lower in sugar content or drink plain water. Switching to these healthier options can help consumers reduce their sugar intake, and in turn, lower their risk of obesity and diabetes further.

(IV) Ban on Higher-Sugar Pre-Packaged SSBs

In Singapore, SSBs with more than three teaspoons of sugar per 250ml serving are not allowed to be sold in schools and on government premises. While this restricts access to higher-sugar SSBs in schools, the students and general population can still obtain such SSBs from other avenues. In 2017, seven major SSB manufacturers have also pledged to limit the sugar content in their pre-packaged SSBs sold in Singapore to no more than six teaspoons per 250ml serving. Another possible measure is to introduce a nationwide ban on the sale of higher-sugar pre-packaged SSBs to further discourage consumption of such SSBs.

Details on Public Consultation

The public consultation paper with details of the four possible measures can be found on REACH at http://www.reach.gov.sg/sugarydrinks.

Views and feedback can be submitted via the REACH website from 6:00pm, 4 December 2018 to 6:00pm, 25 January 2019. All responses received by the closing date will be carefully considered. As part of the public consultation exercise, MOH and HPB will organise dialogues with the public and industry in the coming months. Details of the public dialogues will be provided closer to date.

Prime Minster Lee Hsien Loong had earlier raised the issue of diabetes during his National Day Rally in 2017 and sugar-intake was one of the key topics discussed during the Committee of Supply debate this year.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

议员们分两地宣誓 今晚国会开幕

今天晚上召开第十四届国会的首次会议,李显龙总理表示,他期待所有有经验和新议员的表现。 李显龙昨日(8月23日)傍晚6时在脸书帖文,今晚(24日)国会开幕,受到疫情影响,开幕仪式也首次在多个地方举行。议员们将会在国会大厦和旧国会大厦艺术之家宣誓就职。 “哈莉玛总统将致开幕词,将阐明政府的优先任务和计划,重点在于如何应付冠状病毒19对我国医疗保健和经济所带来的打击。” “国会将在电视上直播。” 他指出,各部门将在接下来的数天,发表并解说政府施政的方针附录,之后将展开辩论环节。他期待各议员能够踊跃发表观点,“无论是有经验者或新加入者”。

政府推降温措施 惟长远房产通膨存隐忧

昨日,新加坡财政部、国家发展部和金融管理局,发布联合文告,调整附加买方印花税(ABSD)以及贷款与价值比率(loan-to value ratio,LTV),尝试为刚从去年下半年重新活络的房地产市场降温。 针对购买第二座房产的买家,附加印花税从原本的7巴仙上调至12巴仙,足足升了5巴仙。购买第二座房产的永久居民也受影响,未来需缴交15巴仙买方印花税。 至于买家的LTV也收紧5巴仙,惟建屋发展局发放的房贷不受影响。第一套房产的LTV定限从现在的80巴仙,减少至75巴仙;借贷期超过30年或借贷至超过65岁,LTV则降至55巴仙。对于购买第二座房产的买家,至少需付25巴仙头期。 根据新的LTV贷款价值比率,对于购买第三座房产后的买家,假设购买100万元的房产,顶所只能获得银行贷款35或15巴仙。至于非个人(如投资公司),其LTV值更被下调至15巴仙。 这不是政府首次推出房产市场降温措施。上一轮是在2013年1月,而从2009年至2013年共推出八轮降温措施。自2013年中至2017年,私宅价格累计下跌11.6巴仙,但是自去年第三季开始回升,大涨9.1%。 过去12个月,房地产交易量也上扬25巴仙,新房产贷款也提升了34巴仙。 金管局乐见房地产市场重新活络,惟担忧价格攀升过快,会追上普通民众的收入增长。 政府突然宣布降温政策, 且在今日即时生效,令房地产商措手不及,也有许多民众漏夜往各个私人住宅销售中心,赶在价格调整前下订单。 降温措施,也是政府一番好意,希望能控制价格,确保老百姓都能买得起房,平心而论,欧美主张自由市场的国家,也未必如此积极控制房价。特别是我国公共组屋系统,一直都为人赞誉。…

Dr Chee Soon Juan – The man who won’t stop running at electric fences

by: Joshua Chiang/ There were two moments in my life when I…

社论:让真相戳破谎言

被指控泄漏1.42万艾滋病患资料的费雷拉,在本月13日开设脸书账号,反驳我国政府对他的指控。 但是,脸书管理层基于他分享私人医疗记录可能对他人构成伤害,已违反脸书社群守则规范,而删除了后者的账号。 脸书管理层强调,应让用户在感到安全的情况下使用脸书,为此设下社群守则规范。在该政策下,会移除掉那些涉及分享私密健康资讯、可能对他人构成伤害的内容或账户。 唐振辉曾抨击脸书乃“散播谎言平台” 但大家还记得吗?我国律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉,去年曾经在国会抨击脸书“成为散播谎言和虚假消息的平台”,毒害和分化社会,激发排外情绪。 这是因为他对于脸书拒绝撤下时事网站States Times Review(STR)不实贴文,而对脸书感到失望。他肯定国会特委会建议,需要立法打击网络假消息保护国家,不能依靠这类社交服务平台来过滤假信息。 脸书曾解释,脸书公司没有明文禁止涉及假信息的贴文,除非贴文内容有可能立即引发暴力行为或造成伤害。但唐振辉不同意上述说辞。 事实上,对于假消息政府有足够多的管道来正视听、澄清事实和捍卫政府的名誉。说实在,有必要攻击脸书、胁迫脸书制定新条规来对付社交媒体? 我想,我们可以询问,究竟这些不实假消息,是否对新加坡人直接构成了伤害?我们没办法辨别是非吗?还是名誉受损的其实是执政党本身? States…