Speaking at the G20 Leaders’ Summit in Argentina on Fri (30 Nov), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that with technological advances in the world, countries must ease workers’ anxieties by supporting displaced workers and equipping them with the right skills to take on new jobs.

“We should work on the basis that technological disruption will create new jobs, even as old jobs are taken away,” he said. He cited how in professions like accountancy and law, “tedious work has been computerised and automated”.

“But the headcount remains, perhaps with computer engineers and programmers augmenting the accountants and lawyers but with professionals who are focusing on tasks requiring human judgment and interaction,” he added.

It is therefore important to provide the workforce with the right education and skills to take up the new jobs, he said.

He also said that governments need to intervene before workers are displaced. One way to do this is to “work with businesses and unions to re-skill and redeploy at-risk employees”, something Singapore is trying to do.

“Workers have to adopt the mindset of lifelong learning because that way, we do not yield to our anxieties, but instead we work hard to make our own futures,” he added.

Quietly negotiating the opening of Singapore labour market to Indian accountants under CECA

While PM Lee appears to attribute displacement of workers like accountants and lawyers to “technological disruption” in the world, his government is also quietly negotiating with India under the “Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement” (CECA) to open up Singapore labour market to more PMETs from India.

Three months ago in Sep, India and Singapore started the 3rd review of the “landmark CECA”, which focuses on trade facilitation, e-commerce, customs as well as movement of professional workers (PMETs) between the 2 countries.

Minister Iswaran’s announcement of the 3rd review came after both countries concluded and signed the 2nd review of CECA earlier this year in May.

He mentioned Ascendas-Singbridge, a Govt-linked company, being one of the Singapore companies which has benefited from CECA.

However, at the conclusion of the 2nd review of CECA, the Indian media revealed that Singapore has proceeded to recognise nursing degrees from some of its education institutions. This was not mentioned by Singaporean media.

The Business Standard of India, for example, reported (‘India signs mutual recognition agreement in nursing with Singapore’, 1 Jun) that the conclusion of the 2nd CECA review makes it “easier for domestic (Indian) nurses to explore employment opportunities in Singapore now, as India has signed mutual recognition agreement (MRA) with the south east Asian nation in this sector”.

The Hindu reported (‘India, Singapore formalise mutual recognition agreement in nursing’, 1 Jun) that India has formalized a MRA in nursing with Singapore which would allow “nurses trained in seven nursing institutions across India to gain employment in the South-East Asian country (Singapore)”.

India continues to press Singapore to mutually “recognise” more Indian degrees of other professions so as to enable more of their PMETs to work in Singapore. The Hindu mentioned that architecture and accountancy have been brought up in CECA discussions earlier with the Singapore government.

Singapore may have little choice as hundreds of millions of dollars from Singapore GLCs have already been invested and stuck in India, as part of CECA.

As more Indian degrees of different professions are recognised by the Singapore government, one would expect to see more Indian PMETs, for example accountants, flooding Singapore’s job market.

Hence, other than “technological disruption”, it appears that the Singapore-India CECA is also a significant threat to our workers too.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Myanmar shadow govt welcomes ASEAN call to end violence

Myanmar’s shadow government of ousted lawmakers has welcomed a call by Southeast…

毕丹星欣见开明雇主 赞同提升低薪工友薪资

本月初,工人党盛港集选区议员林志蔚,在国会提出最低薪资议题,与行动党成员交锋,这也激起国内比较最低薪金制和目前渐进式薪金制(PWM)的讨论,特别是哪个更能确保工友能维持生计?又能让企业持稳经营? 工人党党魁、国会反对党领袖毕丹星,也分享一篇《商业时报》的专题,这篇专题采访多位雇主,探讨老板们对于改善雇员福利的观点。特别是若企业成本上升,业者会否支持提升低薪工友薪资的举措? 令毕丹星感欣慰的是,实则好些雇主的想法都挺开明的!他们都会意识到,若忽略低薪工友的福利和处境,新加坡社会和民众的向心力都可能被动摇,“正是这类的雇主应予以表扬和鼓励,给予支持。” 事实上,最低薪金制和渐进式薪金制的论辩已持续许久,包括过去巡回大使许通美教授也和淡马锡控股主席林文兴陷入论战,前者甚至反驳最低薪金制将降低竞争力的说法,乃是“假论述”。 反对最低薪金制的人士,往往会说让低薪国人赚取更高薪资,反而会造成反效果,例如反而导致低薪国人失业。 若阅读《商时》的这篇采访,例如劳埃德银行集团亚洲(Llyod’s Asia)总裁帕沃斯称,确保雇员获得足够薪资,足以应对基本生计很重要,也提及该银行在英国本土参与的计划– 生活薪资基金,认可多达6千家支付员工薪资,比政府最低薪金更高的企业。 Terrific Mentor国际公司的创办人 John Bittleston,也认为提升低薪工友薪资,乃是最简单快捷的方法,来提升中产阶级的规模,这是社会经济发展乐见的,特别是在冠病疫情时期。该公司也提升了其工友的薪资。…

Temasek’s portfolio is increased not just by its annual profits, but also transfers of funds and profitable companies from Singapore Govt

A common defence against criticism of the high-profile losses suffered by Temasek…

Everybody should have a place in Singapore

by: Ravi Philemon/ On 9 August 1965 in times of absolute uncertainty,…