Some of the ivory tusks seized at Pasir Panjang Scanning Station in March 2018 (Image by AVA/ICA)

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) is seeking feedback from the public on whether to totally ban ivory sale in Singapore.

The month long public consultation (27 Nov to 27 Dec) was launched on Tuesday to gather insight about the public’s thoughts on the AVAs proposed total ban on local elephant ivory sale under the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act.

Currently, Singapore has banned all international trade on elephant ivory products since 1990 under the Convention on International Trade and Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). But trade of ivory products is still permitted domestically if traders can prove that their products were acquired before 1990 prior to the inclusion of relevant elephant species in CITES.

If a total ban is enforced, no one will be allowed to trade any form of elephant ivory product in Singapore, regardless of when it was acquired. Public displays of ivory will also not be allowed with the exception of educational purposes like in zoos and museums.

Back in August, the ivory debate was rekindled when an online store popped up appearing to sell jewellery and accessories made with pre-1990 ivory. The public was aghast and furious – calling for the store to be shut down and for the sale of ivory to be banned completely. It was later revealed to be a part of an awareness campaign by the World Wife Fun for Nature (WFF) about the shortcomings of local wildlife protection laws.

CITES has also been urging participating countries to consider banning domestic trade as well, with countries like China, Hong Kong, the United States and the United Kingdom taking stricter action against the domestic trade of elephant ivory.

So it appears that the government is now exploring the possibility of a total ban. If implemented, a grace period of up to three years will be given to those affected by the ivory ban to decide what they wish to do with their existing stocks of elephant ivory and ivory products.

“Local businesses and individuals who own ivory can consider keeping, donating, or destroying the ivory,” AVA said.

The public have come out in full agreement of the total ban, echoing their earlier sentiments that this should have been done a long time ago. Many even pointed out the redundancy of asking for public opinion when it’s clear that the majority of the public are behind the ban.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

狂扫狮城16万口罩 中国男星“人肉”托运回中国

随着新型冠状性病毒疫情爆发,世界各地对口罩的需求激增,许多国家口罩也供不应求,尤其在重灾区中国湖北,口罩更是难以获得。对此,许多海外组织或当地民众会从海外购买口罩寄回中国境内,缓解口罩短缺问题。 中国著名歌手胡海泉以旗下海泉基金会的名义,于本月2日微博发文,从新加坡采购了16万个口罩准备寄回中国,引发网友关注。 根据相关帖文,胡海泉在请人帮忙托运回国,现场共有40大箱口罩,堆满了足足7个机场行李推车,同时也临时请现场愿意帮忙托运回国的中国旅客,当时也在现场被拍了照片,并透过海泉基金会微博上传。 据悉,现场也有约10个家庭同时登上同一航班,也在协助胡海泉检查口罩。而当时也是在某航空公司停飞前最后一次飞往中国的航班。 胡海泉在后来也在微博上感谢现场协助的人,更表示“人肉带货的方式比某些“正规管道”更有“效率”,最后也感谢“帮他们带货的十几个家庭,你们最棒!”。 至于他如何获得大量的口罩,则仍待厘清。 胡海泉为大陆著名歌手,与大陆歌手陈羽凡组成羽·泉组合。 除了胡海泉,日前也有身在新加坡的武汉人,购买240箱口罩和其他各地的救援物资,以便支援家乡的亲友们。240箱口罩最终在年初三凌晨运抵上海,而湖北省人民政府也为这批资源准备好了相关文件,以专车调度后运往武汉。 由于口罩需求供不应求,我国也陷入“口罩荒”,部分零售商“趁火打劫”,将口罩抬高价钱,贸工部对涉及高价售卖口罩的零售商和三大网络商家发出警告信并表示,政府当局绝对不允许有关的坐地起价行为,并严厉谴责相关业者,更呼吁民众不要向相关业者购买口罩,以免形成不良风气。

【选举】陈振声反驳没“空头支票” 称行动党“需为国人负责”

行动党两名原部长:陈振声和英兰妮称,行动党并没有“为所欲为的口头支票”,须为国人负责。 他们是针对工人党盛港集选区候选人林志蔚,于周三(7月1日)的电视直播辩论中,促请我国选民投票给工人党,并拒绝行动党“口头支票”一说,这么表示。 陈振声在接受《海峡时报》采访时指出,这并非本届大选的正确描述,并补充行动党会对选民、对人民的福祉负责。“在治理方面,行动党始终为人民负责,无论是选举(时期)与否。” “我不认为有空白支票这回事,就好像行动党可以不负责地做任何事情。我不认为这是正确的描述。我们所做的每一件事、每一个脚步,都要为新加坡人、他们的福祉和他们的安宁生活负责,我们必须为国家的持续发展负责。” 陈振声与英兰妮,以及行动党新人陈圣辉及蔡瑞隆,在丹戎巴葛集选区上阵。 林志蔚于周三的辩论上指出,行动党辩称选举其实是赋予他们权利,让国家摆脱次困境,而且他们需要被委托才能这么做。“事实上,在选举结束前,行动党可能就已有了这个权利……我们不是否认行动党已经被授权,而是否认他们可能会为所欲为。” 以非选区议员制度进行牵制 英兰妮同时也引述非选区议员的存在,来反驳林志蔚的说法:“行动党永远没有空白支票,因为不管发生什么事情,宪法保证了至少有12个反对议席”。 她补充道,非选区议员具有和议员一样的投票权,即表示他们可以对宪法修正案、补助和金钱法案,以及信任票等课题上都有投票权。 我国在1984年采用非选区议员制度,以确保国会内拥有最少人数的反对党成员,而在大选中获得最高票数的反对派候选人将可成为非选区议员。非选区议员制度在2016年经过修改,被赋予更多权力,并从原本的九人增加到12人。 这12人中可以包括胜选议员或非选区议员。这也表示,若胜选的反对党议员超过12人,那么就不会有非选区议员的席位。 英兰妮随后在脸书上帖文补充道,虽然保证了反对党议席,却不能保证“拥有明确授权的强而有力政府,去执行任务以度过难关”。“这些(选择)都在选民的手中。”…

Former RP chairman refutes Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s claims

Mr Ng Teck Siong, former Chairman of the Reform Party, intends to…