Last Friday (23 Nov), Singaporeans erupted on social media after a photo was posted showing a ‘pretty high up officer’ dressed up a in a turban and fake beard in what looks like a caricature of a kacang puteh seller.

Joel Tan, who posted the photo, said that he had received it from a source who said the photo was  taken as a recent Sport Singapore Deepavali celebration. On top of the insensitive outfit, the source also pointed out that there was ‘head shaking, random bursts of Tamil, and the handing out of kacang puteh’ during the celebrations.

Joel writes, “Let’s call this what it is: racist caricature. People like to think racism doesn’t exist in Singapore, but it really does. Not even badly disguised racism: just flat out, balls to the wall insensitivity and grotesque tone-deafness.”

Joel Tan goes on to point out the 2015 incident involving MediaCorp Actor Desmond Tan who posted a photo of himself in a turban and blackface to wish his fans a happy Deepavali. Joel stated his offense has such a ‘character’ being played out by Chinese actors, calling the impersonations ‘clownish, ridiculous, and belittling’.

His post drew immediate attention with many people echoing Joel’s comments about the racist nature of the Sports SG celebration. His post has been shared over 800 times and received over 1,000 reactions.

Following up with the story, Mothership.sg identified the man dressed in the turban and beard as Singapore Sports Institute chief Toh Boon Yi.

A spokesperson for Sports SG confirmed to Mothership that the event was an internal staff celebration done annually for its Indian staff.

The spokesperson’s full statement:

“We are aware of a photo taken during our annual Sport Singapore (SportSG) Deepavali celebration circulating on social media.

The event was organised by staff to celebrate Deepavali with our Indian colleagues. The event encompassed both cultural and fun elements that included a sharing of the origins of Deepavali, learning about mindfulness and treats of traditional Deepavali goodies. There was an energetic group dance competition and pageant, where people were encouraged to be attired in both traditional and fancy dress.

The staff captured in the photo was dressed up by his colleagues in a sarong, towel head wrap and a beard, and asked to serve Deepavali snacks. He gave a traditional “hello” greeting in Tamil as staff arrived for the event.

The caricature of a kachang puteh man was neither intended to be disrespectful or to poke fun at others. If anything, the intent was to create a celebratory and appreciative atmosphere amongst our multi-racial colleagues.

We would like to sincerely apologise if any of this has caused offence to people who have seen the posts on social media without the benefit of understanding the context.”

Their apology, to me, sounds more like a non-apology. Sports SG didn’t actually apologise for the events that took place but instead apologised for people being offended by their actions because they didn’t understand the context. So they’re apologising for people feeling offended, not actually for committing the offensive act.

Netizens are just as dissatisfied with Sports SG’s apology as I am:

Many correctly point out that there is a fine line between humour and offense but also that it’s not that hard to figure out when you’re crossing the line:

However, there are quite a number of people who feel that there was nothing wrong at all what Mr Toh did (failing to acknowledge that Sikhs and Indians are two different races and the Mr Toh was mixing stereotypes, which in itself is offensive. But I digress). These users feel that anyone offended by this harmless caricature are simply being sensitive and lack any humour (note their race):

Still, there were some who implored others to put themselves in the shoes of the minority race and asked how they would feel if the tables were turned:

The issue of racism is a sensitive topic in Singapore and like Joel pointed out in his post, it’s not something Singaporean’s are comfortable acknowledging as a problem that still exists. In any diverse country, harmony is a balancing act that requires careful consideration and compassion from all sub-communities, both majority and minority.

So yes, sometimes it may be acceptable to fashion jokes around specific racial stereotypes – but it’s a fine line. And our officials should be aware of this fine line since they live their lives in the public eye. Perhaps the easiest way to make inoffensive race-based jokes it to focus on the positive stereotypes instead. As this user said:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HRH Prince Harry joins in an Iftar with young Singaporeans

Prince Harry received a traditional welcome at Jamiyah Singapore when he arrived…

TOC reports on General Election – 9 & 10 April

You can read the following TOC reports and videos on TOC’s General…

恐引起民众误会 职总平价超市将红“寿”衣下架

农历新年的服饰多以红色为主,但是红色衣服上的图样和用词也有讲究,若穿上印有单独一个“寿”字的红色T恤,别说出门拜年,怕是家中长者都会骂你“不肖子”了,因此售卖有关红“寿”衣的超市,在接受民众反应后,终于将衣服下架了。 日前一名网友在社交媒体上指出,日前在职总平价霸级市场购年货时,发现该超市内卖着红色的T恤,中间印着一个“寿”字,真正一个“红寿衣”,令人看得不舒服。 网友在帖文中写道,“没文化真可怕”。 有关照片随后在网络广传,立刻引起网民的关注热议,纷纷表示制作商和卖家都不够“敏感”,“大吉利是”、“不吉利”,都不怕得罪传统的老人家吗?! 然而,有网民认为可以添加几个字,稍微改良一下,衣服一样能够穿。 有者还认为若把“寿”字改为“瘦”,肯定能够吸引人们购买。 原来“红寿衣”原本是职总平价霸级市场所推出的“福禄寿”系列T恤之一,每件只售卖11.90元,却没想到“寿”字所带出来的其他意思,而引起热议。 该超市在接到相关消息后,已经于周日(12日)将这款T恤下架了。 超市发言人感谢顾客的回馈,了解了其中所可能造成的误会,所以采取有关措施。 当局澄清推出有关系列的T恤时,其实只是祝福民众福禄寿齐全,但是若引起人们的误会,他们则表示抱歉。

撤回《逃犯条例》惟港民续抗争 港多区中学化身人肉连侬墙

尽管上周香港特首林郑月娥宣布撤回修订《逃犯条例》,但仍不能阻止港民继续抗争,务必达成五大诉求。周一(9日),香港多区中学生发起于上课前筑成人链贯穿区内学校。据香港众志脸书专页指出,多达138所学校,其中新界元朗区人链据报长达1公里。 据《立场新闻》回报,早上未开课前,已有近千名学生聚集在葵盛围,串起长达两公里的人链,甚为壮观。大部分学生带上口罩,而部分人持有“五大诉求,缺一不可“的标语,最终在早上8点时,陆续返校上课。 期间,许多路过的民众向学生表达支持,也有部分民众则责骂学生先回去把书念好。多所学校的老师也在校外戒备,避免意外发生。 虽然大部分人链活动都和平结束,在九龙城与大角咀仍传出学生与老师受伤的消息。在九龙城文理书院举行的人链行动,发生一名中年男子持刀袭击学生,导致现场有2至3名教师为了保护学生而受伤。 而在沙田的源和联校人链活动,则是有不明人士从高楼掷下一瓶洗发精,但该举动并未造成学生受伤。 Source: TG Group 另外,据星島日报报道,在大角咀的联校人链行动中,有人朝楼层下方丢水泥,导致一名学生脚轻微受伤,及一名校友手部受伤送医。 《德国之声》报道,除了此活动外,香港九月中学生大罢课的组织也已号召各学校于9月13日发起第二波的罢课行动。 对此,香港教育局回应,人链活动令人忧虑,个别出现声浪问题,被指对居民造成滋扰,甚至引起冲突、伤人、高空掷物,呼吁学校和家长提醒学生注意安全。 《九月中学生大罢课Channel》则对教育局的回应表示不满,并认为被袭击的是学生,为何将责任推在他们身上?…