Public debate over the effectiveness of the social enterprise model that’s being piloted in seven hawker centres around the island is continuing to heat up.

Some of the main concerns that have been raised by the hawkers themselves include high rental, high ancillary costs, the requirement of having an ‘affordable meal’ option that’s less that $3, and unreasonable contractual terms just to name a few.

A recent episode of New Naratif’s Political Agenda podcast included three hawker stall owners who shared their experiences with being in the hawker business and their take on the whole social enterprise model that the National Environment Agency (NEA) is testing out. The feedback was less than glowing.

Following these complaints, the NEA announced that it would conduct a stock-take of the new model to identify and address any issues. However, the NEA insists that the stock-take is regular procedure and isn’t a direct result of the complaints.

In response to the hawkers, Senior Minister of State of Environment and Water Resources Amy Khor said to TODAY that the conversation though well-meaning has been “in part fuelled by hearsay and anecdotes which have emotive appeal”. She continued to say, “some of these hearsay and anecdotes may be well-meaning but (are) misinformed. In fact, quite a number are really not verified.” The Senior Minister basically dismissed the personal experiences of these vocal hawkers as untrue and merely an attempt to stir the pot.

On Monday in Parliament, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli emphasised what was said by Dr Khor, that the NEA’s social enterprise hawker model is ‘generally sound’ and has achieved good outcome in terms of keeping food affordable compared to other hawker centres. He also noted that the majority of the hawkers at these centres are doing well and that 97% of hawkers at Ci Yuan Hawker Centre and 96% of hawkers and Bukit Panjang Hawker Centre chose to renew their contracts as of July.

Now, one hawker stall owner has come out to voice in disappointment in the response given by Senior Minister Amy Khor on his Facebook page, specifically for her comment on ‘hearsay’ and ‘anecdote’.

Mr Lim Jialiang, who was one of the guests on New Naratif’s podcast episode on hawkers, wrote”

“Disappointment can’t even begin to cover my deep-seated emotions that I have towards her words. We are not stupid. We are also not blind to the grievances of our fellow hawkers. We are most certainly not spreading fake news, as you so like to term it.”

He went on to say that the evidence he and his fellow hawkers have produces will “stand up even under rigorous scrutiny in the court of law” – unlike what was implied by Dr Khor. Clearly, Mr Lim is speaking from experience. He mentioned that he had worked long hours before and how some hawkers who work 16-18 hour days, 7 days a week running their stall and falling asleep for 12 hours straight from exhaustion. Anyone who has worked in the F&B industry would know just how taxing that lifestyle can be.

Mr Lim then cites a recent report which alleged an elderly hawker running a stall at the Changi Airport Terminal 4 food court passed away due to overwork. The elderly man had apparently applied to NTUC to shorten his operating hours when his workers go on leave but it was rejected. Not only that, NTUC had apparently also warned the man that he would have to pay a hefty fine of S$500 for each day that he closes his stall, according to the man’s relative who spoke to The Independent. To avoid the fine, the man worked over 18 hours a day – ultimately, that’s what his family believes led to his death.

On his Facebook post, Mr Lim used the term ‘karoshi’ – a Japanese terms for when a person dies from overwork.

This is a serious matter for hawkers in Singapore. It’s not only about making a living, but it’s also life or death at this point, especially with the average age of hawkers being around 50-60 years old.

The social enterprise model, while trying to be beneficial to customers, is throwing hawkers under the bus according to hawkers themselves. The NEA, which oversees hawker centres, is tasked with helping both customers and hawkers but it seems that they’re prioritising one over the other by dismissing the crucial perspective of the hawkers themselves.

When hawkers tell you the issues they’re facing with this new model, it seems only logical that you would listen to them and try to find the best solution. Instead, the NEA has decided to dismiss the personal experiences of hawkers as mere ‘anecdotes’ – having never run a hawker stall themselves, I wonder how they seem to know more about the stresses of the job than the hawkers.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】五例入境病例皆无症状

昨日本地新增77例冠状病毒19确诊病例,其中包括五例入境病例,两例社区病例。 根据卫生部发布的文告,五例入境病例包括一名本地人和一名本地永久居民,分别于本月14日和15日从印度回国;另一名则持有家属准证,于15日从印度入境;一名长期准证持有者,于15日从中国入境。 四人均在入境后开始履行居家通知,并在隔离期间接受冠病检测。 此外,还有一例入境病例为特别准证持有者,于本月8日抵境的船员,但并未曾下船,且在确诊前已经接受隔离。 所有入境病例皆无症状。 另一方面,我国的两例社区病例均为本国公民,分别是31岁的女子和13岁的男子。他们是在出现急性呼吸道症状后进行冠病检测才发现染病。 其余70例新增病例均住在宿舍的工作准证持有者,其中66人被列为确诊病患密切接触者,早前已经被隔离。 本地又有41座客工宿舍从感染群名单移除,被列为安全宿舍。 截至昨日,我国又有168人出院或离开社区隔离设施,其康复总人数增加到5万5139个。 目前仍有66人尚未出院,转入社区设施的有1千340人。死亡病例则维持在27例。

金融局查办42金融机构 罚款高达1680万新元

2017年7月1日至2018年12月31日期间,共有42家金融机构,因涉及滥用市场、金融操守不当和洗钱等违规行为,结果被新加坡金融管理局(MAS)惩处,开出总值1680万新元的罚单。 根据金管局于星期三(3月20日)发布的第一份执法报告,该局还对两宗内幕交易案件和一宗未经授权交易案件,罚款总值69万8000新元。 一人因刑事定罪入狱 金管局的调查,也让投资者莫毕亮,在去年1月因造假交易而被判入狱四个月。 2014年,莫毕亮在13个交易日于即将闭市时,进场购买维利顿资源(Wilton Resources)的股票,导致维利顿资源的闭市价,受到 “人为” 推高,制造假象。 2016年5月至2017年的12个月期间,在金管局调查一马公司丑闻调查结果下,有八家银行被惩处共3千万元罚款。 报告由执法部门编制 有关的报告是由金融局执法部门编制,随后将在每18个月发布一次报告。 有关执法部门是于2016年8月成立。除了金融制裁和刑事定罪之外,该报告也指出,已经向金融专业人士发出19项禁令,禁止他们重返金融业,进行了37次谴责和223项警告。所有案件处理至结案时间平均需时8个月。…

Scoot airlines mistakenly sends emails about Negative COVID-19 certificate requirement for China flight to other customers

Many Scoot customers were surprised to find urgent emails from the airline…

新加坡政府指彭博社、《南华早报》报导有误

我国财政部、内政部、人力部和教育部等部门,自去年11月底开始,就四次援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),要求政治人物和一家时政网络媒体更正贴文。 我国政府动用《防假消息法》也引起外国媒体注意,包括《华盛顿邮报》、《经济学人》、彭博社和《南华早报》等,都跟进报导。 不过,日前通讯与新闻部长新闻秘书何慧玲,则致函彭博社和《南华早报》,抨击两家媒体对于我国《防假消息法》的报导不实,也重申我国没利用该法钳制言论自由。 彭博社指我国代表积极驳斥外媒报导 彭博社在去年12月27日,刊载一则《新加坡为捍卫防假消息法采全球攻势》(Singapore Goes on Global Offensive to Defend ‘Fake…