Chewing tobacco that was seized (Source: HSA).

Kartigesy Seledory was prosecuted for bringing a total of 4,560 sachets of Hans Chaap khaini tobacco, which is a type of chewing tobacco, into Singapore, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) stated on Thursday (15 November).

In a press release, the authority said that the street value of 4,560 sachets of chewing tobacco is estimated to be worth between $4,560 and $9,120.

Chewing tobacco that was seized (Source: HSA).
Close-up of chewing tobacco sachet (Source: HSA).

The 41-years-old man was sentenced to five weeks’ imprisonment and fined $250. He is the fourth person to be convicted and jailed for importing chewing tobacco, which is prohibited in Singapore.

According to the authority, Kartigesy’s vehicle was checked by the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) officers when driving into Singapore via Tuas Checkpoint on 12 August 2017.  ICA’s officer found 2,460 sachets of Hans Chaap khaini tobacco hidden in the rear door panel and in the rear speaker panels of the vehicle.

The accused pointing to the rear door panel where he hid the chewing
tobacco (Source: ICA).
The accused pointing to the rear speaker panel where he hid the
chewing tobacco (Source: ICA).

HSA said that its further investigations revealed that Kartigesy had also smuggled in 2,100 sachets of Hans Chaap khaini tobacco on 10 August 2017.  Kartigesy claimed he was promised $250 by his acquaintance in Malaysia each time he managed to smuggle the prohibited products into Singapore.

Khaini tobacco is a form of chewing tobacco that is intended to be used by placement in the mouth. It consists of moist, dark brown tobacco leaf, mixed with slaked lime or spices and has a distinctive smell.

HSA stressed that the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act prohibits the import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of emerging tobacco products. These include shisha tobacco, smokeless tobacco, and chewing tobacco such as Gutkha, Khaini, Zarda, vaporisers and their constituents.

Any person who is convicted of an offence is liable to a fine not exceeding $10,000, or to imprisonment for up to 6 months or to both, for the first offence and a fine not exceeding $20,000, or to imprisonment for up to 12 months or to both, for the second or subsequent offence for each count of the offence. Information pertaining to prohibited tobacco products in Singapore is available on HSA’s website.

In addition, since 1 February 2018, the possession, purchase and use of emerging tobacco products is prohibited in Singapore.  Any person who is convicted is liable to a fine not exceeding $2,000, for each count of the offence.

HSA strongly advises the public not to purchase or bring harmful tobacco products into Singapore.

HSA also encourages members of the public who have information on the prohibited sale of harmful tobacco products to call its Tobacco Regulation Branch.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李绳武被控藐视法庭获准上诉 撤销总检察署海外庭令

李绳武父亲李显扬,于今早在脸书贴文表示,新加坡上诉庭在昨日驳回高庭决定,允许李绳武上诉,以撤销总检察署的境外传召庭令。 他在贴文补充,“上诉庭的裁决,也印证了我们的信念,即绳武提出的严肃课题,值得认真探讨。“ 他相信,这是有史以来,上诉庭有机会在公开法庭探讨,在李绳武个案的情境下,我国法庭在国外是否具备司法权。 探讨是否具备海外司法权 新加坡总检察署指控,建国总理李光耀的孙子李绳武涉藐视法庭,并采取法律行动。 李绳武是在去年7月15日,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼”,法庭制度“温顺”,被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 李绳武也拒绝撤下有关贴文。他曾指出,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。“难道我在私人脸书上发布“煽动性”炫耀休假的照片,也会被对付?” 李绳武的代表律师在去年12月22日,提出申请以撤销有关在美国递交法律文件给当事人的庭令,但在今年3月26日,被高庭驳回。 李绳武代表律师提出理据,总检察署有必要证明,藐视法庭程序必须根据“成文法”提诉,或是基于成文法来执法。然而,在李绳武发布有关贴文期间,藐视法庭罪并没有成文法律可依据。 其二,即便能以成文法提出藐视法庭诉讼,总检察署错误援引高庭法(Supreme Court of…

MOM moves 342 migrant workers at Space@Tuas dorm to govt quarantine facility after new case detected in the dorm

About 342 migrant workers staying in Space@Tuas dormitory block were moved to…

Minister Tan See Leng now says he hopes not to see a concentration of workers from certain nationality

In a media interview at Joo Chiat Community Club on Saturday (10…