Photo of HDB flats at Lorong 9 from Google Map

Property Update published an article on Monday (29 Oct) revealing that the value of old 3-room HDB flats in Toa Payoh has dropped by as much as 30 percent in the past few years. These are old flats with about 50 years of lease left.

The writer, Timothy Quek, is a property agent. He said, “As a property agent specializing selling HDB flats in Toa Payoh, I can tell you that it is very difficult to find buyers for these aging HDB flats which have undergone upgrading just a few years ago.”

“Sellers who ask for unrealistic prices for their units, even at bank valuation, usually are unable to sell them. For those who need to offload their flats urgently, they will have to give steep discounts of sometimes more than $50,000 to entice buyers,” he added.

He dug out transaction data from HDB website of units belonging to Blk 9 Lor 7 Toa Payoh to illustrate:

* Figure for Apr 2015 was the average value of 3 transactions in that month

Mr Quek shared that if the rate of decline continues at the same rate, the same flat will only sell for $154,000 in 10 years’ time and $107,800 twenty years later. Hopefully, VERS will be offered by the government then. But he feels that the government will not pay the market price of $107,800 for VERS at that point in time.

“Probably much less and those buyers above who paid more than $280,000 for these flats today will make a terrible loss,” he said.

“If you intend to sell your HDB flat, you should consider selling it soon before its lease declines further. The prices of HDB flats usually face a sharp decline when they are more than 40 years old when restrictions of using CPF and bank loan to finance their purchase kick in, thereby severely limiting the pool of ready buyers,” he advised.

Lawrence Wong: Vast majority of flats to return to HDB when leases run out with no compensation

In fact, from the transaction figures above, one can see that after National Development Minister Lawrence Wong told everyone about the hard truth of HDB flats in March last year, the value of old HDB flats literally nosedived.

He reminded everyone that only 4% of HDB flats were redeveloped through Sers since 1995. That is, these old flats, typically at very good locations, were bought back by HDB and the flat owners were compensated accordingly. HDB then knocked down the old flats and built new ones in the same land area for later sale to the public again.

But the vast majority of flats, he noted, will be returned to HDB when their 99-year lease run out without any compensation. “As the leases run down, especially towards the tail-end, the flat prices will come down correspondingly,” he said. “So buyers need to do their due diligence and be realistic when buying flats with short leases.”

Citizens told by PAP Ministers in the past that HDB would grow in value as assets

Before Minister Wong’s reminder, PAP ministers, including PM Lee himself kept talking about the value of HDB would grow in value over time.

At an international conference in 2010, PM Lee said, “The HDB flat is not just a shelter but also a key investment asset… over the long term, the value of HDB flats depends on the strength of the Singapore economy. Provided Singapore continues to do well, our flats will maintain their value, and Singaporeans can enjoy an appreciating asset.”

And just before 2011 General Election, then National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan even said, “We’re proud of the asset enhancement policy. (It) has given almost all Singaporeans a home of their own… that grows in value over time.”

However, as seen in the chart, the value of old HDB flats is plummeting. It doesn’t maintain nor grow over time anymore. As mentioned by Mr Quek, those who bought 3-room HDB flats in Toa Payoh at more than $280,000 would be making terrible losses if they were to sell their flats when they are more than 40 years old.

Perhaps these people can try asking PM Lee or Mah Bow Tan for compensation.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Earnings drop for 2nd consecutive quarter

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM)…

Economist Yeoh Lam Keong explains the problem of poverty in Singapore in inaugural Progress Singapore Party talk

On 10 September, the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) held its inaugural PSP…

社论:为何无法公开新保网袭主谋?

昨日,主管网络安全事务的通讯及新闻部长易华仁,在国会针对新保网袭事件指出,尽管已经明确知道发动网袭的主谋,但政府决定不公开袭击者身份,因为“不符合国家利益”。 根据《联合早报》报导,易华仁称“已经采取适当行动,也知道袭击者的身份。”但是基于国家安全理由,他不愿多加置评,却又没说明已经采取了什么“适当行动”。 这与易华仁在去年八月底部长声明有别,他当时说,尽管掌握把握袭击者身份,却无法百分百确定。 也有议员追问,究竟我国对袭击者采取了什么行动?易华仁也遭质问政府不揭露袭击者的考量。 对此,易华仁指出,我国现在并非没有法律对境内袭击者采取行动,而是公开指名道姓,“是否会我国有利。” 与此同时,他又告知议员们不应只专注于为何政府公开袭击者身份,而是要了解政府的反应和应对措施。 银行遭劫  保安被解雇  却不公布劫匪身份? 吊诡的是,新保集团和IHiS公司因为网袭事件被惩戒,被罚款100万元,还有两名IHiS员工还为此丢了饭碗,一些高层则接受被罚款(却未公布罚款金额)。 打个比方形容:一家银行被手段老练的抢匪打抢了,保安人员因为防守不力被解雇、银行经理被罚款,但是打抢银行、仍逍遥法外的犯罪份子,他们的身份却基于“银行利益”必须保密?把钱放入银行的客户也不得而知,究竟是谁抢了银行? 根据个资保护委会的文告,去年发生的新保集团网袭事件历来最严重,导致约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。…

Source of new Covid-19 case in California is unknown; community spread of virus may happen in US

A confirmed case of Covid-19 of a person who appeared to not…