The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) released a report yesterday (1 Nov), saying that the Singapore system has performed better than most other countries’ in improving the lives of poor and vulnerable families here. However, it did not say which countries it is comparing Singapore with.

The self-praising report came after the globally renowned aid and development UK-based charity Oxfam placed Singapore in last 10 out of 157 countries, in its recent report on Governments’ commitment to reducing inequality 2018. In fact, in terms of progressivity of taxation, Singapore came out last in Oxfam’s report.

MSF said, “The Government ensures access to affordable basic services, creates the opportunities for growth, and provides institutional support and an enabling environment for individuals as they work hard to look after themselves and their families, with support from the community.”

“Where individuals are unable to provide for themselves, such as individuals with disabilities or other health conditions that prevent them from working, the Government has put in place social safety nets, to provide help where family and community support is inadequate,” it added.

In other words, as long as one still has his 4 limps intact, can breathe and work, he must continue to do so. Even if he is disabled and unable to work, the family members must chip-in to help first, never mind if the family members are also burdened with their own problems to solve. Only when all else fail, the government would then step in with its “safety nets” to “help”.

MSF continued, “To mitigate inequalities, we introduced the Workfare Income Supplement Scheme for low-wage workers in 2007 and Silver Support Scheme for the elderly in 2016. The Progressive Wage Model was introduced in 2012 to uplift lower-income workers in sectors vulnerable to cheap-sourcing through a skills-based ladder of pay. We also enhanced housing subsidies to help low- and middleincome families own their own homes.”

Do take note that the housing subsidies provided by the government are not real cost subsidies. They are actually “discounts” from “market price” of HDB flats.

MSF highlights government’s “excellent” achievements in narrowing SG income gap

“Outcomes for the low-income and vulnerable families have improved, and there is some narrowing of the income gap,” MSF said. It highlights its “excellent” achievements:

  1. Nine in 10 students from the bottom 20% by socioeconomic background progress to post-secondary education today, compared to 5 in 10 students from the bottom 20% 15 years ago.
  2. The lower-income group has seen real income growth in the last few years. From 2012 to 2017, households in the lower 50% experienced a higher rate of real income growth compared to households in the top 50%.
  3. Workfare has helped to raise the income of low-wage workers. To illustrate, a 60 year-old worker earning $1,200 a month receives $300 more through the Workfare Income Supplement, which amounts to a 25% top-up in his monthly income.
  4. More than 70,000 resident workers benefitted from higher wages under the Progressive Wage Models in the cleaning, security and landscape sectors.
  5. While 11.8% of households in the top 20% of households spent more than one tenth of their out-of-pocket expenditure on healthcare, 5.6% of households in the bottom 20% of households had to do so.
  6. 87% of Singaporeans in the bottom 20% by resident household income owned their own homes.
  7. 14.3% of Singaporeans born between 1978 to 1982 to families from the lowest 20% in household income made it to the highest 20% in household income.
  8. Singapore’s Gini coefficient declined from 0.388 in 2007 to 0.356 in 2017 (after taxes and transfers).

MSF said it is “committed” to enable Singaporeans to develop to their full potential, so that “we progress together as a society and nation”. It sees a Singapore “where every person is respected and valued, and no one is left behind”.

In any case, as shown in the example above given by MSF of a 60 year-old elderly Singaporean earning $1,200 a month and receiving a pathetic $300 more through Workfare, this government’s real vision appears to be seeing every Singaporean works until his physical body literally gives up on him so as not to burden the government.

And when the person is dead, truly, he is no longer left behind.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡人被困固有社会阶层,动弹不得?

“大部分新加坡人为自己的社会阶级感到困惑,甚至有种被困在自己的阶层中的感觉,无法提升。” 《南华早报》以《如果新加坡那么富有,为何她的公民感到困顿?》为题,报导新加坡国立大学政策研究院(IPS)近日释出的调查报告。 该调查发现,10名受访者中,逾五名受访者表示对未来的财务流动性相当勉强,不到十分之一的人则认为自己的财富会下降。仅44巴仙的人认为在10年内财富会提升。 然而,根据不同教育程度的受访者显示,在中学以下的学历的受访者,只有23.8巴仙的人会预计未来更好,而10.6巴仙的人则认为未来情况会更加糟糕。 《南华早报》日前也曾作相关民调,发现在五名新加坡人中,有四人认为他们的悲观情绪是来自于工资与生活成本的不相符,以及工资停滞不前的现象。 这份报告《新加坡的断层:公众对个人现实感、管理以及未来的讨论》,邀请4015名年满18岁以上的人进行调查。從去年8月至今年1月进行一项民调,探讨可能影响本地社会凝聚力的隐忧。 根据公共政策院官网,有关研究报告的简介,指出近期发生的一些社会事件,都与五大关键议题有关:族群、宗教、移民、阶级和性少数权益(LGBT)。 “无法预估十年后情况” 一名未完成中学学历的受访者何先生表示,在电动滑板车禁令还未开始前,每月依靠送餐员的工作为他赚取2000至3000块的收入;但在禁令开始后,他可能需要考虑考取摩托车驾照,购买新的摩托车才能赖以为生,但他还需要承担抚养妻儿,并且明年可能需要购买三房式组屋,因此这样的改变让生活变得更拮据。 “我真的无法预估十年后的事情,你就算问我两年后的计划,我也只能说我真的不知道如何生存”。他表示,“这里是一个相当富裕的国家,只可惜它的进展太快了,并不是所有人都能够跟得上脚步。” 类似的案例,也发生在不同的教育程度的受访者上。一名仅24岁的杂志撰稿员,在每月收入3000块下,还需要偿还学贷。他表示,他想要对未来保持希望,无奈生活成本过高让她觉得生活停滞不前。 除了要和自己人竞争,还需面对外来者的涌入…

Tan Cheng Bock’s application for new political party receives ‘in principle’ approval from ROS

The Registrar of Societies has approved, “in principle”, an application made by…

SDP’s Chee Soon Juan ‘gratified’ that Bukit Batok MP has finally addressed issue of narrow pedestrian walkway

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan in a Facebook post…

Massive fire at Jurong Island involving oil tank, visible from mainland.

An oil tank caught fire on this afternoon on Jurong Island. The…