FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: Low Thia Khiang, Pritam Singh, and Sylvia Lim. Source: In Good Faith

The three Workers’ Party Members of Parliament who are being sued being sued by the Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (PRPTC) and an independent panel acting on behalf of the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) over an alleged breach of fiduciary duties as town councillors have managed to raise close to $500,000, following their appeal to the public through their blog, “In Good Faith.”

As of 10 p.m. yesterday (25 Oct), the trio has raised $477,653 from 2,832 contributors.

In a statement today (26 Oct), the Workers’ Party has issued a statement declaring that they are not in any way involved in the fundraising.

The Party said in its Facebook post that “the three MPs are undertaking a private fundraising effort,” and cautioned the public against “donating money to any persons claiming to represent the Workers’ Party.”

Additionally, WP had also urged “supporters not to use the Workers’ Party logo or make any claims to represent the Party in their personal efforts to promote the private fundraising.”

On Wednesday (24 Oct), the WP MPs – former secretary-general Low Thia Khiang, current secretary-general Pritam Singh, and chairperson Sylvia Lim – appealed to the public to assist them in funding their ongoing legal costs for the lawsuit, stressing that the allegations made against them are “unfounded.”

They reiterated what they have stated in the court hearings – that they “have acted in good faith,” acted what they believed to be in “the best interests” of their residents and the Town Council itself.

“We have mounted rigorous defences in the two suits, and engaged a legal team from M/s Tan Rajah & Cheah.

“We will fight the claims vigorously. If we lose the suits and are adjudged to pay large sums of money, and are unable to pay, we would face bankruptcy,” stressed the trio. If the three MPs are to be made bankrupt, there is a high chance that they will lose their parliamentary seats.

From the start of the trial, the three WP MPs have been funding their legal costs using their “personal savings,” and also by “contributions from friends,” adding that they “have not used any funds from the Workers’ Party.”

“The total we have paid to our own lawyers to date is close to $600,000, covering the work done before the trial. The costs incurred so far have depleted our personal resources.

“We need financial resources to fight the legal battle and to deal with the prospect of being made a bankrupt.”

The trio received $65,196 in monetary contributions as of 10 p.m. on Wednesday (24 Oct).

The three WP MPs took the opportunity to express their gratitude towards the contributors, adding: “Every contribution, large and small, counts.”

Contributions to the WP MPs can be made through the following channels:

• PayNow to +65 9852 5901 (Sylvia’s public line)

• Internet fund transfer to UOB account no. 396 309 388 6

• Cheque made payable to any one of the three WP MPs: Lim Swee Lian Sylvia, Low Thia Khiang, or Pritam Singh

Alternatively, contributors may reach them through post at “My Mail Box 882560 Singapore 919191,” or arrange to meet them in person by contacting them at [email protected].

“If it is convenient, please include your email address so that we can thank you,” wrote the WP MPs.

The three WP MPs and two other town councillors are being sued by the Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (PRPTC) and an independent panel acting on behalf of the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) for allegedly making “improper” payments worth S$33.7 million to managing agent FM Solutions and Services and other third-party service providers between 2011 and 2015.

Both suits allege that the defendants have failed in their duties, and are liable to pay damages to the two town councils amounting to more than $30 million. The town councillors, however, were not accused of personally pocketing the sums themselves.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

How many did not vote?

Leong Sze Hian Since voting is compulsory, what happens if you do…

NTU student questions whether MOM will revoke work passes of those with Employment Pass, EntrePass, PEP, S Pass who breached circuit breaker measures

On Sunday (31 May), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) student Nabil Khairul Anwar…

调查显示 国人对国内生活成本最不满意

调查显示,本国人对政府最不满意的部分为国内生活成本,但对国家安全以及犯罪水平则是最满意的。 该调查是根据研究机构黑箱研究(Black Box Research)所进行的2019年11月份政府满意度指数(GSI)分析,于12月13日公布。 据调查显示,其中最让国人满意的国家安全与犯罪水平指数,达94巴仙至96巴仙的满意程度,即指国人能够安心地在土地上生活,不需要为治安问题忧虑。而最让国人不满意的则是国内生活水平,与上个月持相同水平,仅达57巴仙。 而整体的满意程度,自2019年1月以来,则维持在80分左右。 调查指出,自10月以来,政府的个别指项满意度调查均有所下降,例如国家安全、种族关系、环境、经济、政府问责、与人口管理。其中以经济的下滑幅度最为明显,而经济通常与国人的生活满意度挂钩。 生活品质与个人财务挂钩,半数人不满意目前生活状态 安盛保险公司日前就发表安盛更美好生活指数的调查指出,国人认为美好生活与个人财务的多寡有所相关,即指财务的多寡成就目标的实现。然而,调查却发现,仅41巴仙的新加坡人,对于目前的生活并不感到快乐,只有五成的人认为他们岁目前生活感到满足,即每两位中,就有一位对他们短期或长期目标的进度感到不满意。 这也意味着,一切阻碍目标实现的困难都与金钱相关,例如生活成本增加、无法储蓄。许多人认为,阻碍他们完成目标的最主要原因在于生活成本的增长,让他们无法实行储蓄习惯,而阻碍了目标的前进。 经常都会听财务专家的建议,指一个家庭内至少要有能够维持至少三个月的紧急基金,应对突如其来的意外或失业。然而,近乎半数的新加坡人却没有能够维持六个月以上的紧急基金,甚至高达两成的人都没有自觉紧急基金的重要性。 退休后生活仍被钱困扰,不尽如意…