In its annual report released yesterday (22 Oct), the HDB said it incurred an overall deficit of $1.717 billion in the financial year of 2017/2018, up from $1.189 billion in the previous financial year.

The major deficit came from an increase in the deficit for HDB’s home ownership programme, from $861 million previously to $1.383 billion in the last financial year.

HDB attributed this increase to more residential units being awarded and more sales completed. In other words, HDB is saying that the more HDB units sold, the more they would lose money. In the last FY, HDB sold 26,857 units – 5,407 more than in the previous FY.

Also, with more HDB units being upgraded under Home Improvement Programme, Neighbourhood Renewal Programme and Lift Upgrading Programme, HDB said that it now saw a bigger deficit of $639 million incurred in these programmes, compared with $482 million the previous FY.

As with every year, HDB will receive a grant from the Ministry of Finance to make up for the deficit.

In the report, it also said that as of March 31, it has helped 62 families in its Fresh Start Housing Scheme. This scheme is to help families with at least one child below the age of 16, who live in public rental flats to buy a two-room flexi flat.

HDB pays for land costs

HDB incurred “big losses” mainly because it has to pay for the land costs to the government.

This was revealed by then National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan in 2013.

At the time, Singaporeans were calling for price of new Build-To-Order (BTO) flats to be de-linked from land costs.

Mr Khaw said it may be politically easy to say land is free because it belongs to everybody, but that is not the case. He said the price of land is tied to acquisition costs, reclamation and the building of infrastructure around it.

He said, “You need to acquire a piece of land; you need to reclaim a piece of land. All those costs money to taxpayers and we are just trustees of taxpayers and those costs are to be accounted for. And even when you have got that land prepared, land is only valuable when we invest in infrastructure, roads, MRT… And all those costs billions of dollars. So to say that land cost is a pittance and therefore should be excluded from total construction costs… I myself think it is not quite an appropriate argument.”

“Every year, hundreds of millions of dollars of losses were incurred by the HDB and that’s why MOF (Ministry of Finance) has to give the HDB an annual grant, otherwise the HDB will be in the red. It cannot be forever in the red, because there’s no way it can make money. Because every unit that we sell, we lose money, HDB loses money. The accounting for the HDB is deficit accounting. So if you incur a S$300-million loss, there is a grant of S$300 million that covers it. That is how we operate the HDB,” he added.

“Let us not perpetuate this talk about HDB is making money out of building houses because if it was so simple, life would be straightforward, but that’s not the case.”

Hence, HDB pays market rate for its land and construction costs. When it prices flats below market rate, it incurs a housing deficit.

Later Khaw confirmed with CNA, “The cost of building HDB flats includes the cost of land, design, construction, financing and other project-related costs. It varies from project to project and year to year.”

Money paid to buy land goes to reserves

So, where does the money goes to after Singaporeans pay HDB to buy a public flat, which was built on land purchased by HDB from government?

This statement from MOF may shed some light:

“The Overall Budget Balance excludes proceeds derived from the (Govt’s) sale of land, as these are not available for spending and are part of Past Reserves. This is because the sale of land converts a land asset into a financial asset, with both comprising part of Past Reserves. To spend the financial proceeds from land sales will mean drawing down Past Reserves.”

Simply, a large part of your money buying a HDB unit goes to the reserves as land sales. And of course, these reserves would be available to state entities like GIC to invest with.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens support Parti Liyani’s claim for S$71,000 in compensation, says she should ask for more

Parti Liyani, a former domestic worker who was acquitted of four theft…

所有行驶上路的脚踏车日后将强制安装刹车器

脚踏车日后强制安装刹车器,才能在人行道和公路上行驶,确保行人和使用者安全。 交通部发文表示,已经接受活跃通勤工具咨询小组(Active Mobility Advisory Panel,简称AMAP)所提呈的第四份报告。 其中该份报告建议所有脚踏车强制安装刹车器,以解决无刹车器脚踏车所带来的安全隐患,而这项建议也受到活跃通勤工具社群、零售商和行人的欢迎。 “我们会与咨询小组密切合作,加以实施,详情将在恰当时候公布。” 活跃通勤工具即指脚踏车、个人代步工具,以及电动脚踏车、轮椅和踏板车。 另一方面,自去年12月起,我国规定使用活跃通勤代步工具进行商业活动的骑士,均需在第三方责任下受保,即指业者必须为旗下使用活跃通勤工具的送餐员和工作人员购买第三方责任险。 咨询小组指出,必须监督该条例的有效性,以及与保险业者商讨提供便利购买且负担得起的保险。 对此,交通部表示同意,并将与该咨询小组合作,继续深入研究该课题。

59 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; all locally transmitted, 19 unlinked

As of Thursday noon (12 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

无视马路上野鸡群直驶而过 网友怒批驾驶者冷血

网友看到一辆车子无视在马路上觅食的野鸡一家,直接开过去,几乎导致“家破人亡”,愤而在脸书上帖文怒骂,也引起其他网民的议论纷纷。 在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff昨日(12日)有网民上传了一段视频,写到“怎么能够这样驾车(赶)走鸡群”。 短短只有九秒的视频中,只见一辆黑色轿车自惹兰柏民宾(Jalan Pemimpin)的Mapex大楼驶出,无视马路上正在觅食的野鸡一家,包括一只公鸡和母鸡以及九只小鸡,就直接开过去跑了。野鸡群看到车辆驶来时纷纷逃避,所幸无“鸡”受伤或死亡。车子开走时,一名站在马路中央的老伯目睹整个过程,甚至呼喊了黑车司机,要求对方注意。 大部分网友都炮轰轿车司机没良心、冷血、驾驶技术有问题,因为出路时并没有左右观察就出路了。“若连路上这么多鸡仔都看不到,到底怎么考到驾照的”。 但是也有部分网民敦促他人不要看图说故事,也有可能是老伯在路上喂食,导致鸡群聚集在路中央,危及驾驶者。