Source: STOMP ST

The tragic electrocution of 15 year old Tan Yao Bin while he was taking a shower due to improper wiring and a faulty circuit breaker in his HDB flat has been called an “unfortunate misadventure”. Based on reports however, this sounds more like death caused by gross negligence rather than an “unfortunate misadventure”.  Gross negligence not just by the two workmen who connected the water heater but by the original builders of the HDB flat!

First and foremost, why are unlicensed electricians permitted to hold themselves out as able to connect electronic products? Is there criminal misrepresentation here? Secondly, it would appear that the unlicensed electricians had connected the wires based on “what was already there.” This would imply that it was already unsafe to begin with and an accident waiting to happen. What does this say of the original HDB works? Has the HDB been shoddy in their work?

What causes even more concern is one workman’s statement that based on his experience with over 30 HDB blocks, almost 78 per cent of water heaters were connected in this manner. Does this mean that so many other people are susceptible to this risk of electrocution every time they take a shower? That is a scary thought! Especially in hot and humid Singapore where people take multiple showers a day! How many times a day are we unknowingly subjecting ourselves to these risks of electrocution just by the simple act of taking a shower?

The coroner has cautioned on the importance of safety in handling electronic objects but I don’t think this adequately deals with the case at hand because in this case, the wiring was faulty! How can we be more careful if it is the product that is faulty to begin with? She furthered sounded a word of caution to workmen to be more “mindful” but this isn’t about mindfulness! This is negligence!

Will there be an investigation on all HDB blocks to ensure that the wiring is not faulty? Considering that the workmen were simply reinstating “what was already there”, this could mean that this faulty wiring is prevalent! If we are to prevent another senseless death such as this death, nothing short of an investigation and rectification of all flats that have this type of faulty plugs and wiring will suffice! To call this senseless and needless death an “unfortunate misadventure” trivialises life and makes a mockery out of the meaning of accountability.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

路标不清、树木倾斜 本地部落客抱怨白沙榜鹅市镇会疏忽

本地部落客Philip Ang,近日发现白沙榜鹅社区内一些公共设施有破旧、路标不清和树木倾斜的问题,便向市镇会投诉。 该部落客表示,他在白沙榜鹅一带看到一些树木明显倾斜,像是美化工作未妥善规划。此外,他也在那一带看见许多因为经常曝露在阳光底下而褪色的路标,导致居民难以辨认,有些路标看起来更像是一只电线杆上的金属板。 随后,他也在去年12月30日将上述问题致函至白沙榜鹅市镇会主席沙礼尔(Mohamed Sharael Taha ),并抄送一份给国家发展部,但得到的回复是“会派遣相关负责人前往调查“。 Philip表示,他在此后也发现到市镇会试图解决问题,方法却只是拉直树木,或者直接砍掉。 对此,Philip再回复国家发展部常任秘书吴凤萍,质问将树木砍掉是否即视为“解决问题“,并提醒沙礼尔,市镇会的资金筹集均来自居民和纳税人,一旦发现有规划不良的种植计划,或是在社区内出现破旧的路标,该承包商是否应该尽早解雇。 最后Philip指出,对方似乎是一位无动于衷、不负责任的主席,轻视系统性问题,并敦促国家发展不应该建议白沙榜鹅市镇会,严加管理选区。

Some small countries do it better. Really?

~By: Kumaran Pillai~ We do it better. I used to sing to…

父失踪23年仍扣健保保费 公积金局建议家属登记死亡证明

网民Yukumi Wu在脸书分享,今年8月5日,迎来他父亲巫明福失踪第23年。她上载一张当年的报案纸,回忆父亲在乡村俱乐部当球童,但是1996年的8月4日晚上失踪后,一直到今天仍下落不明。 她说,亲属曾怀疑,父亲是否已遭不测,但找不到遗体,至今,家里人仍相信父亲还活着。 Yukumi Wu也透露,每年,公积金局仍从父亲的户头扣除终身健保(Medishield)保费,因为该局记录显示父亲仍在世,而家人至今也仍未取得父亲的死亡证明。 “我收藏着这份报案纸整整23年!未知在警局系统里,是否仍有他作为失踪人口的记录?” 由于Yukumi Wu提及,公积金局仍如常扣除其父亲的户头缴付终身健保保费,故此当局在昨日于脸书回应,同情他们一家的处境,但也澄清根据该局记录,过去有关失踪者家属仍未向该局寻求协助。 不过,公积金局表示,已接洽Yukumi Wu,向她解释申请宣告其父亲已离世的程序。 需向法院申请假定死亡证书 当局称,根据业界做法,直到在移民关卡局数据中已登记为离世,否则当局仍会假定当事者仍在世。…

理应居家隔离还跑去按摩! 确诊永久居民遭提控上庭

根据卫生部文告,有多达五人因涉嫌违反冠病19条例,被提控上法庭。其中一名57岁本地永久居民Namasivayam Sundar,去年返国后出现症状而前往接受检测,但等候检测期间,还跑去接受一小时半的按摩服务! 这名男子在按摩隔日确诊冠病。他在去年3月20日返回新加坡之前,曾先后前往印度、法国巴黎和阿拉伯联合酋长国迪拜,进行商务旅游。 不过,返国后隔日就出现发烧症状。在自行服药没改善后,24日就去诊所求医,也被转介到国家传染病中心接受检测。 在等候检测结果前,Sundar理应在家隔离,但他还前往惹兰苏丹的布业中心,享受1小时半的按摩服务! 当然他也需为此付出代价,在今年1月29日在传染病法令下,因涉嫌在公共场所让他人曝露在感染风险而面控。 此外,还有37岁的本地女子Bawani、30岁的本地男子Abdul Rashid、22岁的本地女永久居民Ang Siu Yen和20岁的本地男子Foo Suan Rong,也在面临提控。…