Reading a description of the future of Singapore, starting with the ambitious plans to create a futuristic Orchard Road, one could be forgiven for thinking that it is a page out of a sci-fi novel. With sensors on “every lamppost, on every tree, in every public pool and drain pipe, every citizen’s transaction via ePayments and driverless cars zipping around – I wonder if it is all too much. Honestly, I am not sure I want to live like this. There’s “smart” and there’s totally invasive. Why do we need sensors on every tree and lamppost when we can’t even prevent hacks from occurring within our existing technology?

Just this year, our health system suffered a cyber breach of epic proportions which saw the details of 1.5 million people stolen, including the private details of our Prime Minister! The Committee of Inquiry (COI) that was set up to investigate this incident is not even concluded and yet we already have news of the detection of multiple unauthorised log-in attempts on the Health Promotion Board’s (HPB) HealthHub portal over four days. With all of these incidents straining the limits and abilities of our cyber security systems, why are we planning more and more outrageously unnecessary plans?

It is important to point out that sensors with facial recognition technology is extremely invasive. If the government can’t even keep our phone numbers safe and private, how can we trust that they will be able to keep even more intimate and personal information such as what these sensors will detect safe?

Reading reports on these far fetched ideas, I cannot help but wonder if the government holds the data of its citizens in any form of regard. As citizens, do we even consent to our facial features being captured and saved for perpetuity in this manner? Secondly, to push ahead with being even more “smart” when we have not even resolved the SingHealth breach gives off the impression that the government feels zero accountability for our personal data.  Are our privacy issues and data security so inconsequential to them that they can be so flippant?

How much will all this “smart” technology cost? Has a comprehensive cost benefit analysis been done? The last thing we need is a vanity project that may make Singapore look good internationally but in actuality has little effect on improving the day to day lives of the average citizen. If all these measures are implemented without in depth and foolproof security measures installed, a hack that will dwarf the SingHealth hack could occur. What will the government do then? Let’s not be too “smart” for our own good.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

In telling us that 100,000 jobs will be created, Minister Chan is only giving us half the story

The headline from Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing’s national broadcast…

Hip-hopping MPs

By The Kentang Analysts say that the PAP’s embrace of Hip-Hop, in…

教育界前高官涉非礼女下属 遭判监六周仍要上诉

一名67岁的教育界前高官,因强抱女下属,涉嫌滥用职权,非礼罪名成立。本月18日法官判他监禁六周! 不过,这位前高官仍不满判决,打算提出上诉。他被指控于2016年3至9月期间,五次非礼一名43岁女下属;以及在同年2月至12月间,曾四次非礼一名55岁女下属。 早前在审讯后,法官判他非礼43岁女下属的五项控状不成立。但是,非礼55岁女下属控状罪成。控方也打算针对前面五项控状上诉。 在本月4日,控方针对刑罚陈词时,曾指出被告毫无悔意,反诬告受害者先主动;且专挑午餐时间办公室四下无人时下手,以顺利续约为由,伺机紧抱受害者。 受害者之后出现健康问题,包括心悸、持续性咳嗽、呼吸困难等,曾在办公室晕倒,甚至有自杀倾向。 被告也违背信任,滥用职权,占受害者便宜,其刑罚必须达到阻遏作用,以示警戒。 然而,辩护律师则称,被告罪行不至于坐牢。律师求情时表示,被告是紧抱受害者一二秒钟,非常短暂且无肌肤接触。被告也没用手触摸受害者的敏感部位。此外,并无证据显示,受害者心里受到伤害。 律师辩称,案发时被告也不知其他同事在不在办公室,若要滥用职权,大可把被告叫到隐秘房间。 法官下判时指出,由于无法证明受害者健康问题,是因为案件造成,加上被告仅短暂拥抱受害者,未直接肌肤接触,性剥削程度较低。 但是,法官对涉及上下属职场非礼的案件零容忍,判被告监禁六周。 目前,被告仍有三项控状搁置,直至下月8日进行审前会议。

Why invoke POFMA when a simple Facebook post will do the trick?

On 22 January 2020, the Minister of Home Affairs (MHA) issued a…