Reading a description of the future of Singapore, starting with the ambitious plans to create a futuristic Orchard Road, one could be forgiven for thinking that it is a page out of a sci-fi novel. With sensors on “every lamppost, on every tree, in every public pool and drain pipe, every citizen’s transaction via ePayments and driverless cars zipping around – I wonder if it is all too much. Honestly, I am not sure I want to live like this. There’s “smart” and there’s totally invasive. Why do we need sensors on every tree and lamppost when we can’t even prevent hacks from occurring within our existing technology?

Just this year, our health system suffered a cyber breach of epic proportions which saw the details of 1.5 million people stolen, including the private details of our Prime Minister! The Committee of Inquiry (COI) that was set up to investigate this incident is not even concluded and yet we already have news of the detection of multiple unauthorised log-in attempts on the Health Promotion Board’s (HPB) HealthHub portal over four days. With all of these incidents straining the limits and abilities of our cyber security systems, why are we planning more and more outrageously unnecessary plans?

It is important to point out that sensors with facial recognition technology is extremely invasive. If the government can’t even keep our phone numbers safe and private, how can we trust that they will be able to keep even more intimate and personal information such as what these sensors will detect safe?

Reading reports on these far fetched ideas, I cannot help but wonder if the government holds the data of its citizens in any form of regard. As citizens, do we even consent to our facial features being captured and saved for perpetuity in this manner? Secondly, to push ahead with being even more “smart” when we have not even resolved the SingHealth breach gives off the impression that the government feels zero accountability for our personal data.  Are our privacy issues and data security so inconsequential to them that they can be so flippant?

How much will all this “smart” technology cost? Has a comprehensive cost benefit analysis been done? The last thing we need is a vanity project that may make Singapore look good internationally but in actuality has little effect on improving the day to day lives of the average citizen. If all these measures are implemented without in depth and foolproof security measures installed, a hack that will dwarf the SingHealth hack could occur. What will the government do then? Let’s not be too “smart” for our own good.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NTUC Foodfare clarifies worker repacking masks with bare hands in the viral video was undeclared side business

NTUC Foodfare clarified on 7 April that one of its workers had…

Netizens furious at AVA for showing no sympathy to the man who was bitten by a snake in the case of mishandling the reptile

Netizens are furious at Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) for…

工人党“枕戈待旦” 人民党放话角逐四选区

随着选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)出炉,根据以往从公布新选区划分报告、再到宣布大选的进程,坊间都在揣测选举蛩音已不远,有者甚至猜最早下个月,斋戒月前就会大选。 尽管当前我国仍面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情笼罩,不过总理李显龙早前曾释放信息,似乎暗示当前有两种可能性,其一是期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前稳定下来;其二,若在疫情当前召开选举,意味着将要在“风口浪尖”下,选出获得全新委任的新政府接手抗疫工作。 不过他表示:“如需要在疫情过去前召开选举,必须采取必要防疫措施,确保各政党能有效率地竞选、民众可安全投票。” 这意味着具备疫情当前举行选举的可能性。但若此时选举,各路在野党已表达不认同的立场,例如前进党秘书长陈清木医生就指出,在我国投票是强制性的,且到时会有大型选举活动,形同让260万选民蒙受感染的风险。 至于工人党则表态“政府理应慎重”,应顾虑国人的公共健康和利益。 何时选举,工人党“枕戈待旦” 不过,工人党也放话任何时候召开选举,该党都枕戈待旦,“我们为此准备了四年”。再者该党强调将采取必要防疫措施,确保竞选活动公平且安全。 来届选举除了要坚守阿裕尼集选区和后港,相信工人党或会强攻东海岸;至于上届选举工人党也有不错战绩的凤山、盛港西和榜鹅东单选区,却突兀地被取消,相信该党将只得转攻盛港集选区(纳入原有的盛港西)、榜鹅西和从义顺集选区重新划出的哥本峇鲁(Kebun Baru)。 至于民主党在去年就已表态有意竞逐于上届选举同样的选区,包括武吉巴督、裕华和武吉班让单选区,以及荷兰-武吉知马和马西岭-油池集选区。 前进党如何排兵布阵?陈清木“卖关子” 至于刚在去年成立的前进党,年初曾大阵仗拜访西海岸选区。根据选区范围委会划分,该区扩大为五人集选区后,也纳入丰加北单选区,和蔡厝港集选区的一部分。不过该党秘书长陈清木医生早前受访时曾表示,仍在规划部署该党将出战的选区,惟后者“卖关子”未透露更多。…

CNA-promoted news site disappears; new site propped by SMRT Feedback

Observer+, a Singapore-based online news site that was promoted by Channel News…