Source: STOMP ST
A coroner’s inquiry into the death of a 15-year-old boy had found that the faulty wiring done by unlicensed workers following a Housing Board upgrading programme led to the boy’s electrocution while he was showering.
The wiring involved the connection of a water heater to a three-pin plug.
Findings from the inquiry also revealed that the flat’s circuit breaker – which could have prevented Tan Yao Bin from being electrocuted, by terminating the electrical current – also showed signs of malfunction.
The incident, which happened two years ago, had prompted the Housing Board to remind its contractors to issue a warning to residents in the event that such three-pin plugs are found, in addition to advising residents to test their home’s circuit breakers on a monthly basis by pushing the test button and observing if the button trips.
Following the completion of the Home Improvement Programme a year prior to the incident, Yao Bin’s mother, Madam Zhang Aiyan wanted to have a new water heater installed in their home.
She sought the services of an electrical subcontractor from JL Engineering Construction to carry out the installment. The worker had connected the heater to a three-pin plug, which was later tested by his supervisor, Mr Ooi Kah Heong who found that the entire wiring system was functioning as intended.
Contrary to the work done by Mr Ooi and his subordinate, three-pin plugs and regular wall sockets should be connected directly to a special switch that has a higher capacity, compared to the one used by the electrical workers.

Mr Ooi testified at the inquiry that while he recognised that wiring a water heater to a three-pin plug poses a safety hazard, he cited his positive “experience with more than 30 HDB blocks,” in which “almost 78 per cent of water heaters were connected to three-pin plugs.”

However, he said he would usually notify the owner of a unit undergoing the HIP prior to carrying out the work, and in the case of Yao Bin’s family, he claimed to have not been able to do so as he never met them.

The coroner’s inquiry also found that the cable connecting the neutral and earth terminals in the plug was loose, and that the neutral and earth cables had melted and fused together. The latter cable was also connected to the casing of the heating tank, which was connected to the shower-head by a metallic hose.

This would result in full circuit as the electric current flow went into the tank’s casing, through the hose, then striking Yao Bin’s body, before finally reaching the wet ground, according State Coroner Kamala Ponnampalam, adding that the current that went through Yao Bin’s hand was 0.95A, the magnitude of which was fatal.

She said this “unfortunate misadventure” should pose as a warning for contractors and electricians to exercise great caution and sound judgement prior to carrying out work that poses a clear safety hazard, adding that “they ought to alert the resident to the potential dangers.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Fatal accident at Tuas worksite during lifting operation, 46th death this year

A construction worker died in hospital after he got hit by a…

班机三度延误 服务“糟糕” 乘客誓言不再搭乘新航

新加坡航空公司一架飞机因机械故障,导致班机延误约17小时,再遇上“可悲”的服务水平,乘客在脸书上帖文抱怨,甚至誓言不再乘搭新航。面对有关的延误事件,新航已经做出道歉。 据《今日报》指出,新航一架原定于周五(11月29日)下午4时25分,自我国飞往印度首都新德里的SQ406航班发生机械故障,航班延至隔日早上9时30分才启程。 其中一名乘坐该班机到新德里,以参加孩子颁奖典礼的乘客Deep Roy因为不满航班公司的服务,因此在脸书上分享其糟糕经验,只是过后他就将有关的帖文删除了。 他指出,当时他们在候机室等待多时,但是新航职员却没有提供任何详细解释,而且他们也没有为有关的延误做好准备。 他表示,有关班机首次因为天气的缘故,而延误了数小时。但是当他们在没有空调的飞机舱中等待了超过一小时后,当局才表示飞机发生机械故障,乘客们有被安排回到候机室。 “当时我们只获得当局提供,‘少得可怜’的15元餐券,他们都不愿意拿出我们原本在机舱中就能够享用的餐点。” 他指出,当机组人员表示飞机已成功试跑,并安排乘客再度登上同一班机时,已是晚上11时了。但是在要起飞时,再传来噩耗,指班机面对另一宗机械故障。因此乘客们又在凌晨1时返回候机室。 乘客要求更换飞机 “当我们向机组人员表示基于安全考量,不愿意在登上同一班飞机时,他们却表示没有准备代用的A380飞机了,但是他们的总部和货仓都在新加坡,而且还是国际航班啊!” “新航并没有意思要为滞留的乘客准备住宿,甚至表示所有的酒店已经客满了。他们都在对我们说谎!” 他指出,当乘客们在不断地抗议和要求后,机组人员才拿出三文治、咖啡和茶来,而乘客们最后也在第三度登上不同的飞机,于早上9时启程到新德里。…

【选举】攻击穆仁理家人短片疯传 徐顺全谴责人身攻击手段

武吉巴督人民行动党候选人穆仁理指出,其家人遭到网络人身攻击,但是他不会被吓退。至于对手徐顺全则暂时放下政治歧见,在此事上声援穆仁理,促请始作俑者停手。 昨日提名结束后,穆仁理在脸书申诉,发现有关他孩子的帖文和短片被传出。 他表示,他的儿子涉及丑闻,是一名已被判刑的罪犯,法庭已经定案了。“但是这则帖子在这时候传出,其背后的动机令我们难以想象。” “是的,我是个不完美的父亲,是的,我的家庭面对问题。但是,不应该,这事件不应该被带到政治领域中。” 眼见家人受到这样的“突然袭击”,他感到心痛和受伤,但是绝对不会被吓跑。 “我将加倍努力,争取获得武吉巴督居民的支持,继续为社区服务。谢谢。” 徐顺全:请停手! 听闻大选对手穆仁理家人的短片在网站上流传,徐顺全站在大义上,暂时放下歧见声援穆仁理,促请始作俑者停手。 尽管未看过有关恶意短片,惟他吁请各界停止转发,“这不是政治该有的,政治是关乎如何让我们的国家变得更好,而不是像这样的人身攻击。” 他表示即使不认同穆仁理的政治观点,但双方还是能有健康和专业的辩论。“但我们的政治异议,不应被矮化成不合理地污蔑候选人和他们的家属。”

Dr Tan Cheng Bock responds to the Law Minister

From Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s blog: — It is important that the…