I would think that it would be common practice to cross your “T”s and dot your “I”s when you are compiling a report that could potentially lead to a court case that could cost the public millions. According to reports, this is not the methodology practiced by PwC partner Goh Thien Phong (Goh). It is mind-boggling that he saw no need to provide FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), agent for Aljunied Hougang Town Council (AHTC) a chance to respond to his allegations before publishing his report.  Goh claims that speaking with FMSS would not have changed his opinion but how can he know whether his mind would have been changed if he does not even know what they would have said to him? He never asked?

Doesn’t it sound like Goh’s mind was already (subconsciously or otherwise) made up? Has this prejudgment on the part of Goh (unwittingly or otherwise) resulted in a drain of public resources? If so, will there be repercussions? Can the public potentially take a case against PwC for negligence leading to the waste of public resources?

The trial to date has been focused on the minutiae, ranging from the level of one’s command of the English language to whether or not trust is the same as control. Come on people! Don’t we have real things to be concerned about? What is the actual harm that has been done to the people of Singapore or the residents of AHTC? Secondly, is the purported harm worth the herculean court case and its accompanying costs?

Looking at what has reportedly transpired in court thus far, all I can see are the apparent gaps in practices utilised by accounting giants KPMG and PwC in Singapore. Both have compiled their reports in a seeming vacuum, ignoring context altogether. How accurate can such reports be?

Further, PwC has displayed its own staggering lack of internal communication. Seems strange that an entity that is alleging another of negligence and breach of duty may also be guilty of the same? And in fact arguably more guilty given the bigger consequences on the public purse strings?

A lot of the argument laid out by counsel for Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council (PRPTC), Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, is premised on the fact that in appointing FMSS as managing agent, the WP did not call for a tender. WP’s Low Thia Khiang’s explanation for this is that the other existing agents in the market would not have worked for the WP managed town council while Singh disagreed with Low’s explanation, accusing Low of protecting WP supporters who had worked in Hougang Town Council for twenty years.

Looking at the unique political landscape in Singapore where political party and sovereignty sometimes seemingly overlap, is Low’s explanation that far fetched so as to be so vociferously challenged by Singh?

Like many things revealed by this trial to date, it just seems like it is a mountain made out of a molehill.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

停止用“好吃懒做”刻板印象简化街友问题

工人党非选区议员吴佩松分享他尝试协助街友的经历:他被居民告知有街友以纸皮包裹御寒,卷缩在组屋底楼一角休息,旁边还有他的一些物品,和挂着他的衬衫。好几次吴佩松尝试找到这位街友,都没见着。   “他们露宿或许都有原因,有的可能是有家归不得;有的有面对一些困难,虽然知道政府有援助,但不愿求助;一些是因为从事工时长工作,想在外头合个眼休息。有些则只想独处。”   也是一名社会学者的吴佩松透露,在协助工人党前党魁暨阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强在选区工作期间,也有遇到一些街友。一些居民可能视街友为不速之客,是市镇会该处理的问题;而一些人同情,但不知怎么帮助他们。   吴佩松坦言,自己也只能尽量尝试提供他们帮助,他说曾劝阻一名要在组屋底层扎营的街友,因为这会影响其他街坊,并答应带他去社会与家庭发展部(MSF)寻求帮助,不过这位街友则会去和朋友同住。   而另一街友个案,则是住在组屋底层闲置的学习区。吴佩松尝试找他,发现他的随身物品整齐地对方桌上,吴佩松留了名片请街友联系他,但隔天街友就离开了,令他感到懊悔,说以后也不留名片,而是希望能和他们见面,好好谈谈。 根据今年初的国会问答,社会与家庭发展部在2015-2017年之间,平均每年协助385名街友个案。 可能有些人对街友的刻板印象都认为街友是好吃懒做、无业游民等等,结果才会沦落露宿街头。 部分街友有工作、甚至有房子…

COVID-19 and the politics of fear

by Khush Chopra What is behind people’s fear as to the COVID-19…

Ms Teo’s announcement of tightening of FCF shows the ineffectiveness of Jobs Bank

In a Facebook post on the first day of 2020 yesterday (1…

4月21日晚《乐坛巨人》音乐会 与鼎艺团重温作曲大师彭修文经典名作

向华乐作曲大师彭修文致敬,新加坡鼎艺团将在下月21日(星期日)晚上7时30分,于新加坡大会堂音乐厅举办《乐坛巨人》彭修文作品音乐会。 华乐作曲大师彭修文(1931-1996 年),是中国现代民族管弦乐的奠基人之一,他对华乐的贡献成就了一个世代,把华乐带进了国际平台,有当代华乐创 作“音乐之父”的称号。同时彭大师也是华乐乐坛历史中最具重要及代表性的人物之一。 今年四月,本地华乐室内乐团鼎艺团 2019 年乐季的重点节目之一,彭修文作品音乐会《乐坛 巨人》就是为了向彭大师表示致敬。 音乐会将在新装修的新加坡大会堂音乐厅举行,全场呈献彭大师的经典作品,如《秦。兵马俑》幻想曲和《不屈的苏武》以及由彭大师改编的《乱云 飞》和《月儿高》。 这场音乐会中,华乐发烧友们也能见证来自彭修文大师亲手建立的中国广播民族乐团——华乐著名夫妻档扬琴演奏家张高翔和胡琴演奏家姜克美,与资深中胡演奏家许文静倾情呈献。 鼎艺团指挥郭勇德也将特别在音乐会上指挥兼任鼓领奏呈献《丰收锣鼓》。…